The present study will be a randomized controlled study in which 500 treatment-naive HIV patients will be randomized 1:1 to Efaviren 400mg v.s. 600mg combined with lamivudine and tenofovir. The whole cohort will be followed for two years. Efficacy and safety of each regimen will be evaluated throughout the study.
As efaviren has been commonly used as the first-line therapy in HIV infection worldwide, its major side effect i.e. the mental effects have been noticed and has a major influence on the adherence and efficacy of ART regimen. Mental effects of efaviren have been especially critical in Chinese patients, as the effective and toxic ranges of efaviren plasma concentration in Chinese patients are very close to each other. In this study, 500 treatment-naive Chinese patients with a body weight \< 60kg will be screened and recruited. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to efaviren 400mg v.s. 600mg combined with lamivudine and tenofovir. All patients will be followed regularly for 2 years, at 0, 2w, 4w, 3m and every 3 months. Virological and immunological measurements will be done at each visit. Meanwhile, various mental scales will be performed at each visit to evaluate the mental effects of each arm.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
500
The experimental arm will receive 400mg efavirenz per randomization with other two antiretroviral medication (tenofovir and lamivudine).
The active comparator arm will receive 600mg efavirenz per randomization with other two antiretroviral medication (tenofovir and lamivudine).
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Change from Baseline Virological measurements at 12 weeks
Plasma viral load
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change from Baseline Virological measurements at 24 weeks
Plasma viral load
Time frame: 24 weeks
Change from Baseline Virological measurements at 48 weeks
Plasma viral load
Time frame: 48 weeks
Change from Baseline Virological measurements at 72 weeks
Plasma viral load
Time frame: 72 weeks
Change from Baseline Virological measurements at 96 weeks
Plasma viral load
Time frame: 96 weeks
Change from Baseline Immunological measurements at 12 weeks
CD4 T cell count
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change from Baseline Immunological measurements at 24 weeks
CD4 T cell count
Time frame: 24 weeks
Change from Baseline Immunological measurements at 48 weeks
CD4 T cell count
Time frame: 48 weeks
Change from Baseline Immunological measurements at 72 weeks
CD4 T cell count
Time frame: 72 weeks
Change from Baseline Immunological measurements at 96 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
CD4 T cell count
Time frame: 96 weeks
Adverse effects measured by Dizziness Handicap Inventory
Measure statistically significant difference in perception of dizziness by administering the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) between two groups at different time point. The 25-item tool comprises three sub-scales: physical (DHI-P; 7 items), emotional (DHI-E; 9 items), and functional (DHI-F; 9 items) and each item is scored from 0 to 4. Grading standard: 0-30 points is defiend as minor obstacles, 31-60 points as moderate obstacle, and 61-100 points as serious obstacle with high risk of falling.
Time frame: 0, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 weeks
Adverse effects measured by Hamilton Depression Scale-24
Measure statistically significant difference in perception of depression by administering the Hamilton Depression Scale-24 (HAMD-24) between two groups at different time point. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) has a total of 24 items. 14 items were scored from 0 to 4, and 10 items were scored from 0 to 2. The total score that less than 8 points is defined as no depression, 8 to 20 points as may be depression, scores that more than 20 is defined as mild or moderate depression, and more than 35 points as severe depression.
Time frame: 0, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 weeks
Adverse effects measured by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Measure statistically significant difference in perception of sleep quality by administering the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) between two groups at different time point. PSQI was used to assess the sleep quality of subjects in the last month. It consists of 19 self-evaluation items and 5 other evaluation items, of which only 18 self-evaluation items participate in scoring. 18 items constitute 7 components, and each component is scored according to 0 \~ 3 grades. The PSQI total score ranges from 0 to 21. The higher the score indicates the worser sleep quality.
Time frame: 0, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 weeks