4 mA tDCS, Estrogen, and Leg Muscle Fatigability

Overview

The majority of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) studies have failed to consider sex as a modulating factor. This neglect may partly account for the high inter-subject variability bemoaned by many tDCS investigators (e.g., approximately 50% of participants do not respond to tDCS) and has certainly delayed progress in the field. Therefore, research into how sex influences stimulation-related outcomes is vital to fully understand the underlying mechanisms of tDCS, which has shown great inconsistency. Because of the menstrual cycle, the hormonal levels of women fluctuate considerably more than in men. Importantly, these hormonal variations might impact the efficacy of neuromodulatory tools, like tDCS. It is suggested that estrogen, which is high in the second follicular phase, reinforces excitatory mechanisms in the motor cortex. However, because anodal tDCS enhances cortical excitation there is also a possibility of excessive excitability. For instance, anodal tDCS may lead to overexcitation and non-optimal performance when it is applied in the second follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. Currently, there is a lack of knowledge on how the phases of the menstrual cycle affect tDCS performance outcomes in healthy young women because no studies have examined if and how the phases of the menstrual cycle alter tDCS efficacy. This study is critical for determining the optimal time to administer anodal tDCS, and the ideal intensity for that administration, to achieve the most beneficial results. Furthermore, this investigation will emphasize the need for future tDCS studies to test women during the same menstrual cycle phase.

The majority of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) studies have failed to consider sex as a modulating factor. This neglect may partly account for the high inter-subject variability bemoaned by many tDCS investigators (e.g., approximately 50% of participants do not respond to tDCS) and has certainly delayed progress in the field. Therefore, research into how sex influences stimulation-related outcomes is vital to fully understand the underlying mechanisms of tDCS, which has shown great inconsistency. Because of the menstrual cycle, the hormonal levels of women fluctuate considerably more than in men. There are two main phases of the menstrual cycle: 1) the follicular phase, characterized by low levels of estradiol and progesterone (first follicular phase, days 1-7) followed by increased levels of estradiol and low levels of progesterone (second follicular phase, days 7-14); and 2) the luteal phase (days 14-28), characterized by moderate estradiol and high progesterone levels. Importantly, these hormonal variations might impact the efficacy of neuromodulatory tools, like tDCS. It is suggested that estrogen, which is high in the second follicular phase, reinforces excitatory mechanisms in the motor cortex. Thus, it appears that higher levels of estradiol increase cortical excitability. However, because anodal tDCS enhances cortical excitation there is also a possibility of excessive excitability. For instance, anodal tDCS may lead to overexcitation and nonoptimal performance when it is applied in the second follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. Currently, there is a lack of knowledge on how the phases of the menstrual cycle affect tDCS performance outcomes in healthy young women because no studies have examined if and how the phases of the menstrual cycle alter tDCS efficacy. This research will be significant because the changing hormone levels during the different phases of menstruation in women is an especially important factor for minimizing response variability from tDCS. Thus, this study is critical for determining the optimal time to administer anodal tDCS, and the ideal intensity for that administration, to achieve the most beneficial results. Furthermore, this investigation will emphasize the need for future tDCS studies to test women during the same menstrual cycle phase.