To determine the safety of antithrombotic treatment discontinuation 12 months following successful transcatheter PFO closure.
Young patients with a cryptogenic ischemic event undergoing transcatheter PFO closure exhibit a low but clinically relevant risk of bleeding (overall and major bleeding) at long-term follow-up, eventually exceeding the risk of ischemic events. Importantly, the vast majority of major bleeding events seem to occur in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy. Preliminary data suggest that antiplatelet therapy discontinuation is not associated with any increase in ischemic events, and could potentially translate into a lower rate of major bleeding events at longer term follow-up. We therefore hypothesize that in young patients without any other comorbidities increasing the risk of stroke, shorter-term (≤1 year instead of lifelong) antiplatelet treatment could be a safe option following PFO closure.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
100
All patients will undergo a clinical evaluation and cerebral MRI at 12 months (before antiplatelet treatment cessation) and at 24 months post-PFO closure.
IUCPQ
Québec, Quebec, Canada
RECRUITINGPresence of new stroke events
1)Acute episode of a focal or global neurological deficit with at least one of the following: change in level of consciousness, hemiplegia, hemiparesis, numbness or sensory loss affecting one side of the body, dysphasia or aphasia, hemianopia, amaurosis fugax or other new neurological symptom(s) consistent with stroke.(2)Duration of a focal or global neurological deficit ≥ 24 hours OR \< 24 hours if available neuroimaging documents a new hemorrhage or infarct; OR the neurological deficit results in death.
Time frame: 12 months
Presence of new ischemic lesions
Evaluated by MRI
Time frame: 24-month follow-up
Number of new cerebral ischemic lesions
Evaluated by MRI
Time frame: 24-month follow-up
Volume of new cerebral ischemic lesions
Evaluated by MRI
Time frame: 24-month follow-up
Number of ischemic events
Stroke, TIA
Time frame: 24-month follow-up
Number of ischemic events
Stroke, TIA
Time frame: 3-year follow-up
Number of ischemic events
Stroke, TIA
Time frame: 4-year follow-up
Number of ischemic events
Stroke, TIA
Time frame: 5-year follow-up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Number of ischemic events
Stroke, TIA
Time frame: 6-year follow-up
Number of ischemic events
Stroke, TIA
Time frame: 7-year follow-up
Number of ischemic events
Stroke, TIA
Time frame: 8-year follow-up
Number of ischemic events
Stroke, TIA
Time frame: 9-year follow-up
Number of ischemic events
Stroke, TIA
Time frame: 10-year follow-up
Rate of bleeding
Life-threatening, major or minor bleeding
Time frame: 24-month follow-up
Rate of bleeding
Life-threatening, major or minor bleeding
Time frame: 3-year follow-up
Rate of bleeding
Life-threatening, major or minor bleeding
Time frame: 4-year follow-up
Rate of bleeding
Life-threatening, major or minor bleeding
Time frame: 5-year follow-up
Rate of bleeding
Life-threatening, major or minor bleeding
Time frame: 6-year follow-up
Rate of bleeding
Life-threatening, major or minor bleeding
Time frame: 7-year follow-up
Rate of bleeding
Life-threatening, major or minor bleeding
Time frame: 8-year follow-up
Rate of bleeding
Life-threatening, major or minor bleeding
Time frame: 9-year follow-up
Rate of bleeding
Life-threatening, major or minor bleeding
Time frame: 10-year follow-up