This study is a prospective, interventional, multi-center 1:1 randomized non-inferiority trial. The trial evaluates the safety and efficacy of the Magic Touch PTA sirolimus drug-coated balloon in comparison to the treatment with PTX drug-coated balloon (control device) in patients with femoropopliteal artery disease.
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), in which a balloon is advanced and inflated in the obstructed artery for several seconds to minutes, has become the standard endovascular treatment for peripheral arteries. The long-term success of bare balloon PTA in the fem-oropopliteal segment is hampered by the occurrence of restenosis, which can be reduced by local antiproliferative drug delivery via the PTA balloon catheter. The rationale of this study is based on the hypothesis that the usage of the Sirolimus-coated Magic Touch Sirolimus DCB is at least equal (non-inferior) with regards to efficacy and safety in comparison with a clinically well-established PTX coated balloon. The objective of this prospective, randomized, multi-center, post-market study is to compare the Magic Touch Sirolimus DCB with Paclitaxel-coated DCB for treatment of high grade ste-notic or occluded lesions in SFA and / or P1 segment of the popliteal artery (PA) in PAD pa-tients.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
478
PTA with an drug-coated balloon catheter (DCB) in the femoropopliteal artery
Patency rate (Absence of clinically driven target lesion revascularization)
patency rate after one year defined as absence of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) due to symptoms and drop of ABI of ≥ 20% or \> 0.15 when compared to post-procedure or restenosis with PVR \> 2.4 evaluated by duplex ultrasound
Time frame: one year after study procedure (PTA with medical product under investigation or comparator)
Safety outcome
Composite of freedom from device and procedure-related death through 12 months post procedure as well as freedom from both target limb major amputation and clinically-driven target vessel vessel revasculariza-tion
Time frame: through 12 months post-procedure
TLR rate
ocurrence of Target lesion revascularization (TLR) at certain time Points
Time frame: 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months after study procedure
Rutherford classification
Sustained clinical improvement: an improvement shift in the Rutherford classification of one class in amputation and TVR free surviving patients
Time frame: at 12 months after study procedure
Walking capacity assessment 1
patient-self-assessment of walking distance
Time frame: at 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months after study procedure
Walking capacity assessment 2
6-minute Walking test (6MWT)
Time frame: at 6, 12, 24, 48 months after study procedure
Walking capacity assessment 3
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Medical University Vienna, Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin II, Klinische Abteilung für Angiologie
Vienna, State of Vienna, Austria
Medizinische Universität Graz, Klinische Abteilung für Angiologie
Graz, Austria
Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie
Klagenfurt, Austria
Universitätsklinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Klinische Abteilung für Kardiovaskuläre und Interventionelle Radiologie
Vienna, Austria
Hanusch-Krankenhaus
Vienna, Austria
University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen
Bad Krozingen, Germany
Fürst-Stirum-Klinik Bruchsal, Klinik für Kardiologie, Angiologie, Diabetologie, Neurologie und Intensivmedizin
Bruchsal, Germany
Sana Kliniken Oberfranken Coburg
Coburg, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Institut und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie
Dresden, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Essen, Westdeutsches Herz- und Gefäßzentrum Essen, Klinik für Kardiologie und Angiologie
Essen, Germany
...and 12 more locations
Treadmill test (optional)
Time frame: at 6, 12, 24, 48 months after study procedure
Walking capacity assessment 4
Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ); 20 questions (scale 0 to 4); best score 0, worst score 80
Time frame: at 6, 12, 24, 48 months after study procedure
Duplex Ultrasound
Duplex-defined binary restenosis (PSVR \>2.4) of the target lesion
Time frame: post-procedure and at 6, 12, 24 and 48 months or at any time of re-intervention
ABI
Ankle brachial index (ABI)
Time frame: at discharge, 6, 12, 24 and 48 months
Qualilty of Life Assessment
Quality of life assessment (QoL) by EQ5D-3L questionnaire; 5 questions (scale 1 to 5), best score 5, worst score 25
Time frame: at 1 month, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Secondary Safety: freedom from all cause death, target limb major amputation and clinically-driven target vessel revascularization
Composite of freedom from all cause death through 60 months post procedure as well as freedom from both target limb major amputation and clinically-driven target vessel revascularization
Time frame: trough 60 months after study procedure