The investigators propose to conduct a retrospective study to define and quantify the variable occupational and non-occupational risk among various HCWs who got COVID-19 . The investigators aim to determine the rates of acquisition of COVID-19, in the context of level of exposure , adequacy of PPE use and other infection control measuresrecommended for COVID-19 and also to define the risk of secondary disease transmission to other household members of HCWs.
Risk of transmission of COVID-19 virus to healthcare workers (HCWs) is matter of debate since the start of this pandemic. In absence of adequate research, the transmission risk is based on non-human studies, non-HCWs epidemiological studies and experiences from previous pandemics or epidemics. The true magnitude of the risk to HCWs has not been clearly estimated. In absence of good scientific data, general recommendations create confusion and mistrust among HCWs. Besides lots of myth and misconceptions among the HCWs including physician adds to emotional and physical challenge in reduction of nosocomial transmission of COVID-19. COVID-19 related lockdowns have disrupted the global supply-chain and good quality personal protective equipment (PPE) has become an intense matter of discussion from the start of pandemic. The rational use of PPE has become necessity to ensure sustained supply to those who need it in the frontline. In absence of reliable risk assessment and management based on true incidence calculation leads to either inadequate or overestimation of risk and unjustified use of PPE. The reported global data for occupational risk of COVID -19 for HCW varies greatly but it is reported to be higher than general populations. However, many of these studies has significant limitations, like inadequate risk assessment, community transmission is not accounted or all HCWs not included for analysis. The investigators propose to conduct a retrospective study to define and quantify the variable occupational and non-occupational risk among various HCWs, to determine the rates of acquisition in the context of level of PPE use and other infection control measures recommended for COVID-19 and also to define the risk of secondary disease transmission to other household members of participants.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
286
NMC Specialty Hospital, Al Nahda
Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Rate of COVID-19 in healthcare workers (HCWs)
Positive HCW divided by total exposed HCWs in that category X 100 Rate will be calculated in 4 different categories. 1. Front line HCWs (doctors, nurses, respiratory therapist, physiotherapist, dialysis technician, patient assistant etc) 2. Front line support staffs (Customer care, pharmacist, billing assistance, ambulance driver etc.), 3. Clinical support staffs- (dietician, food service worker, laundry worker, housekeeping staffs, health record staffs- infection control team etc.) 4. Non-clinical support staffs- (Administrative support staff.)
Time frame: 6 months
clinical severity of infection in HCWs
WHO Ordinal scale 1. Uninfected No clinical or virological evidence of infection Score 0 2. Ambulatory : No limitation of activities Score 1, Limitation Score 2. 3. Hospitalised(Mild disease): No oxygen Score 3, Nasal prongs or Mask Score 4 4. hospitalised (Severe disease): noninvasive ventilation/high flow nasal canula- score 5, Intubation and mechanical ventilation Score 6, mechanical ventilation and any other oxygen support like vasopressors Score 7 5. dead score 8
Time frame: Within 28 days of illness.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.