This phase III trial compares the effect of adding darolutamide to ADT versus ADT alone after surgery for the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer. ADT reduces testosterone levels in the blood. Testosterone is a hormone made mainly in the testes and is needed to develop and maintain male sex characteristics, such as facial hair, deep voice, and muscle growth. It also plays role in prostate cancer development. Darolutamide blocks the actions of the androgens (e.g. testosterone) in the tumor cells and in the body. Giving darolutamide with ADT may work better in eliminating or reducing the size of the cancer and/or prevent it from returning compared to ADT alone in patients with prostate cancer.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To determine whether 12 months of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and darolutamide improves metastasis-free survival (MFS) compared to 12 months of ADT plus placebo in men with high risk prostate cancer (defined by Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Post-surgical \[CAPRA-S\] score \>= 3 and a high Decipher score (\>= 0.6) \[C3+D+\]) who have undergone radical prostatectomy. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine whether 12 months of ADT and darolutamide improves recurrence-free survival (RFS) compared to 12 months of ADT plus placebo in men with high-risk prostate cancer that have undergone radical prostatectomy. II. To determine whether 12 months of ADT and darolutamide improves event-free survival (EFS) compared to 12 months of ADT plus placebo in men with high-risk prostate cancer that have undergone radical prostatectomy. III. To determine whether 12 months of ADT and darolutamide improves overall survival (OS) compared to 12 months of ADT plus placebo in men with high-risk prostate cancer that have undergone radical prostatectomy. IV. To determine the rate of testosterone recovery and time to testosterone recovery in each treatment arm. V. To evaluate the safety and tolerability of ADT and darolutamide. CORRELATIVE OBJECTIVES FOR EXPLORATORY BIOMARKERS: I. To discover a novel gene expression signature in the Decipher transcriptome platforms that is predictive of clinical outcome, as defined by the primary and secondary objectives of this study, in response to ADT by intensification with darolutamide versus ADT alone. II. To assess the prevalence of subclasses of established transcriptome expression signatures and prospectively validate their predictive value for ADT response, these include: (i) androgen (AR) activity (ii) Basal-luminal subtyping based on modified PAM50, and (iii) ADT score. III. To assess whether the spectrum of high Decipher scores (0.6-1.0), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels at presentation and post-radical prostatectomy (RP) and final pathology variables affect the response and outcome to ADT and darolutamide. QUALITY OF LIFE (QOL) OBJECTIVES: I. To compare overall quality of life, measured by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) total score, at 18 months between the two arms. (Primary) II. To compare the change in overall quality of life, measured by FACT-P total score, from baseline to 18 months between the two arms. (Secondary) III. To compare patient-reported fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy \[FACIT\]-Fatigue scores) at 12 months between the two treatment arms. (Secondary) IV. To compare the change in subjective patient-reported cognitive function (FACT-Cognitive \[Cog\]) from baseline to 12 months between the treatment arms. (Exploratory) V. To compare subjective patient-reported cognitive function (FACT-Cog scores) at 12 months between the two treatment arms. (Exploratory) OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients receive goserelin acetate, leuprolide acetate, or triptorelin via injection every 3 months for 12 months (4 injections), every 4 months for 12 months (3 injections), or every month for 12 months (12 injections) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also receive a placebo four times daily (QID) for 52 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM II: Patients receive goserelin acetate, leuprolide acetate, or triptorelin via injection every 3 months for 12 months (4 injections), every 4 months for 12 months (3 injections), or every month for 12 months (12 injections) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also receive darolutamide QID for 52 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 36 months.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
27
Given PO
Given via injection
Given IV
Given PO
Ancillary studies
Given via injection
City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center
Duarte, California, United States
Los Angeles County-USC Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
USC / Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
Stanford Cancer Institute Palo Alto
Palo Alto, California, United States
VA Palo Alto Health Care System
Palo Alto, California, United States
Metastasis-free survival (MFS)
The primary comparison will be an intention-to-treat analysis of all randomized patients. The method of Kaplan and Meier will be used to characterize the time-to-event endpoints, and a logrank test will be used to compare these endpoints across treatments.
Time frame: From randomization to development of metastatic disease or death, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 36 months
Recurrence-free survival (RFS)
The method of Kaplan and Meier will be used to characterize the time-to-event endpoints, and a logrank test will be used to compare these endpoints across treatments.
Time frame: From randomization to any of the MFS events, pelvic lymph node recurrence or detectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (PSA >= 0.2 ng/mL, confirmed by a second PSA of the same level or higher), whichever occurs first, assessed up to 36 months
Event-free survival
The method of Kaplan and Meier will be used to characterize the time-to-event endpoints, and a logrank test will be used to compare these endpoints across treatments.
Time frame: From randomization to any of the RFS events, treatment with salvage radiation therapy with or without systemic therapy, or initiation of systemic therapy for presumed recurrence, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 36 months
Overall survival
The method of Kaplan and Meier will be used to characterize the time-to-event endpoints, and a logrank test will be used to compare these endpoints across treatments.
Time frame: From randomization to death by any cause or date last known alive, assessed up to 36 months
Testosterone recovery rate
Exact binomial confidence intervals will be used to describe the proportions of patients with testosterone recovery in each arm.
Time frame: At time of disease progression, assessed up to 36 months
Time to testosterone recovery
The method of Kaplan and Meier will be used to characterize the time-to-event endpoints, and a logrank test will be used to compare these endpoints across treatments.
Time frame: From randomization to a return of serum testosterone level to greater than or equal to lower limit of normal for the testosterone assay, assessed up to 36 months
Incidence of adverse events
Toxicity will be defined using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.
Time frame: Up to 78 weeks
Change in quality of life: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)
Will be assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) - Prostate, FACT - Cognitive, and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue. Fatigue instruments at baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months, and descriptive statistics will be used to characterize quality of life over time in each arm. Each item is answered on a 5-point Likert-type scale, where a value of 0 indicates the statement is not applicable, and a value of 5 indicates the statement is applicable to the respondent. Subgroup analysis will be performed among patients who receive adjuvant radiation therapy and patients who do not receive adjuvant radiation therapy in each arm. Mixed effect models will be constructed as an exploratory analysis to estimate the time profile of quality of life assessments in the two arms and to evaluate treatment-by-time interactions.
Time frame: Baseline up to 18 months
Overall quality of life: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)
Will be assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) - Prostate total score. The total score can range from 0 to 156, where a higher value indicates a better quality of life. Mixed effect models will be constructed as an exploratory analysis to estimate the time profile of quality of life assessments in the two arms and to evaluate treatment-by-time interactions.
Time frame: At 18 months
Change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) - Prostate score
A paired t test will be used to compare Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) - Prostate scores at these two time points in each arm. The total score can range from 0 to 156, where a higher value indicates a better quality of life. A two-sample t test will be performed to compare the changes in FACT - Prostate scores from baseline to 18 months between the two arms. Mixed effect models will be constructed as an exploratory analysis to estimate the time profile of quality of life assessments in the two arms and to evaluate treatment-by-time interactions.
Time frame: Baseline up to 18 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
City of Hope South Pasadena
South Pasadena, California, United States
City of Hope Upland
Upland, California, United States
Hartford Hospital
Hartford, Connecticut, United States
GenesisCare USA - Lakewood Ranch
Lakewood Rch, Florida, United States
Mount Sinai Medical Center
Miami Beach, Florida, United States
...and 105 more locations