Immediate Load in Dental Implants Using Conventional Drilling and Piezoelectric Osteotomy on Aesthetic Zone.

Universidad de Granada30 enrolled

Overview

Compare the survival rate of the implants placed using the ultrasonic technique and placed using conventional drilling, with an immediate load on the aesthetic zone.

Main goals. Compare the survival rate of the implants placed using the ultrasonic technique and placed using conventional drilling, with an immediate load on the aesthetic zone. Specific goals. * Evaluate the marginal peri-implant bone loss after the healing period through radiographs, from the day of surgery, to a month, to 3 and 6 months after and a year after the implants insertion. * Evaluate the primary stability of each individual implant the day of their insertion to verify their load on the moment of surgery and also compare the values of each preparation techniques of implant bone preparation. * Evaluate the secondary stability of each individual implant and compare the values of each preparation techniques. * Evaluate the peri-implant clinic parameters within 3 and 6 months and a year after the insertion of the implants through these variables: probing depth and bleeding of probing.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

TRIPLE

Enrollment

Conditions

Dental Implants Tooth Loss

Interventions

Piezoelectric osteotomy.PROCEDURE

Implants placed using the ultrasonic technique.

Conventional drillingPROCEDURE

Implants placed using drilling technique

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 YearsHealthy volunteers:

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Absence of teeth on the aesthetic zone, whether its an incisor, canine or premolar. * 3 months after the dental extraction without alveolar scar tissue remains. * Bone availability of at least 5mm of width and 13mm of length. * At least 2 to 3 mm of soft tissue for the establishment of an adequate peri-implant biological width. * Oclusal pattern that ensures prosthetic success. * Implants need to have at least a 35 N and 70 ISQ index to be loaded. * Index of plaque \< 20% and/or inactive periodontal disease. Exclusion Criteria: * Acute myocardial infarction in the last 2 months. * Uncontrolled coagulation disorders * Uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c\> 7.5%). * Radiotherapy on head/neck in the last 24 months. * Immunocompromised patient. * History of medication related to osteonecrosis of the jaws. * Psychiatric disorders, alcohol, drugs and large smokers (\>10 cigarrillos). * Plaque index \> 20%. * Need for simultaneous or previous peri-implant guided bone regeneration procedures.

Locations (1)

Isabel Godoy Reina

Almería, Spain

RECRUITING

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Marginal Bone Loss

To compare MBL measured using radiographs.

Time frame: 1 month

Marginal Bone Loss

To compare MBL measured using radiographs.

Time frame: 3 months

Marginal Bone Loss

To compare MBL measured using radiographs.

Time frame: 6 months

Marginal Bone Loss

To compare MBL measured using radiographs.

Time frame: 12 months

Secondary Outcomes

Primary stability

Implant Stability Quotient Values (Osstell ISQ, Osstell USA) obtained from implants in study site, recording immediately.

Time frame: Baseline

Secondary stability

Implant Stability Quotient Values (Osstell ISQ, Osstell USA) obtained from implants in study site, recording at 3 months.

Time frame: 3 months

Probing depth

Evaluate the peri-implant clinic parameters within 3 and 6 months and a year after the insertion of the implants through these variables: probing depth and bleeding of probing.

Time frame: 3,6,12 months

Bleeding of probing

Evaluate the peri-implant clinic parameters within 3 and 6 months and a year after the insertion of the implants through these variables: probing depth and bleeding of probing.

Time frame: 3,6,12 months

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.