The primary objective of this study is to assess whether the combination of grass allergen sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) and dupilumab for 2 years is more effective than double placebo in suppressing the nasal allergen challenge (NAC) response to grass pollen at 1 year after completion of study medication.
This is a double-blind (masked) placebo-controlled trial in adults (N=108 subjects will be enrolled) with moderate to severe seasonal allergic rhinitis and allergic sensitization to grass pollen. Eligible participants who demonstrate a positive response defined by a Total Nasal Symptom Score \[TNSS\] ≥ 5 (Scale 0-12 in response to a Nasal Allergen Challenge \[NAC\] with grass pollen extract), will be randomized to one of the following 3 groups in a 1:1:1 ratio: * Grass allergen sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) + dupilumab (n=36) * Grass allergen SLIT +dupilumab placebo (n=36) * Grass allergen SLIT placebo + dupilumab placebo (n=36) Grazax® is a sublingual grass allergen immunotherapy product approved for clinical use in the United Kingdom and will be used as SLIT in this study. Grazax (and its matching placebo) will be self-administered daily by participants for a duration of two years. Dupixent®is the brand name for dupilumab and is a monoclonal antibody against the interleukin 4 (IL-4) receptor. Dupilumab (and its matching placebo) will be administered every two weeks by subcutaneous injection through for a duration of two years, administered by study personnel. The treatment phase of two years will be followed by an observation phase of 1 year.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
108
An initial dose of 600 mg (two 300 mg injections), followed by 300 mg administered every other week (biweekly), by subcutaneous injection.
One Grazax® tablet daily, by sublingual administration. Grazax® is formulated as a freeze-dried oral lyophilisate/orally disintegrating tablet for oromucosal use. The active pharmaceutical ingredient is a standardized allergen extract derived from extraction and purification of grass pollen from timothy grass (Phleum pratense). The biological activity of the allergen is expressed in Standardized Quality Tablet units (SQ-T) units. The Grazax® dosage is one oral lyophilisate (75,000 Standardized Quality Tablet units (SQ-T) or approximately 2800 Bioequivalent allergy units (BAU), a measure of Phleum pratense SQ total biological potency defined by the FDA.
Royal Brompton Hospital
London, United Kingdom
TNSS Area Under Curve (AUC) Post Nasal Allergen Challenge (NAC) Over the First Hour After the Challenge (0-1 Hour (hr) at Year 3
NAC (TNSS Area-under-Curve \[AUC 0-1hr\]), comparing the TNSS AUC 0-1 hr between the referenced treatment arms: a clinical tolerance outcome measure at Year 3, one year after completion of treatment. The Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) is a participant-reported composite symptom assessment of 4 symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching and sneezing), each scored on a scale from 0 to 3 where 0 = none, 3 = severe. TNSS total score is calculated as the sum of the response for all 4 individual nasal symptom scores and can range from a minimum score of 0 to a maximum score of 12: a higher score indicates more severe symptoms. The primary treatment comparison is between SLIT/Dupilumab and Double-Placebo.
Time frame: 0 to 1 hour of the NAC at Year 3 (One Year After Completion of Treatment)
TNSS Area Under Curve (AUC) Post Nasal Allergen Challenge (NAC) Over the First Hour After the Challenge (0-1 Hour (hr) at Years 1 and 2
NAC (TNSS Area-under-Curve \[AUC 0-1hr\]), comparing the referenced treatment arms at years 1 and 2 while on study treatment for clinical desensitization. The Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) is a participant-reported composite symptom assessment of 4 symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching and sneezing), each scored on a scale from 0 to 3 where 0 = none, 3 = severe. TNSS total score is calculated as the sum of the response for all 4 individual nasal symptom scores and can range from a minimum score of 0 to a maximum score of 12: a higher score indicates more severe symptoms. The following treatment comparisons are of secondary outcome interest: * Comparison between SLIT/Dupilumab and Double-Placebo * Comparison between SLIT/Dupilumab versus SLIT/Dupilumab Placebo Both treatment comparisons are key secondary endpoints at Year 2 and therefore multiplicity adjustments are considered; however, at Year 1 the same comparisons are not adjusted for multiplicity.
Time frame: 0 to 1 hour of the NAC at Years 1 and 2
Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF) (Delta PNIF Area Under the Curve [AUC] 0-1 hr) at Years 1, 2, and 3
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Two subcutaneous injections of Placebo (for Dupilumab) as a loading dose followed by a single injection administered every other week. Dupixent® placebo is a subcutaneous injection whose composition is identical to the active Dupixent®, with the exception of the active pharmaceutical ingredient.
One tablet of Placebo (for Grazax®) daily, by sublingual administration. Grazax® placebo is a tablet whose composition is identical to the active Grazax® tablet with the only exception being exclusion of the active pharmaceutical ingredient, Phleum pratense Standardized Quality Tablet (SQ-T) units.
PNIF is defined as the speed of inspiration of air in Liters per minute when breathing into the lungs through the nose. Lower scores indicate less ability to breathe air into the lungs due to more severe nasal congestion. The following treatment comparison is of secondary outcome interest, where Year 3 is a clinical tolerance outcome measure, and Years 1 and 2 are clinical desensitization outcome measures: • Comparison between SLIT/Dupilumab and Double-Placebo According to the SAP, this treatment comparison at Year 3 is a key secondary endpoint and therefore a multiplicity adjustment is considered; however, at Years 1 and 2 the comparisons are not adjusted for multiplicity.
Time frame: 0 to 1 hour of the NAC at Years 1 and Year 2, and at Year 3 (One Year After Completion of Treatment)
TNSS Peak (Maximum) Value Post Nasal Allergen Challenge (NAC) Over the First Hour After the Challenge (0-1 Hour (hr) at Years 1, 2, and 3
The NAC Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) is a participant-reported composite symptom assessment of 4 symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching and sneezing), each scored on a scale from 0 to 3 where 0 = none, 3 = severe. TNSS total score is calculated as the sum of the response for all 4 individual nasal symptom scores and can range from a minimum score of 0 to a maximum score of 12: a higher score indicates more severe symptoms. The following treatment comparison is of secondary outcome interest, where Year 3 is a clinical tolerance outcome measure, and Years 1 and 2 are clinical desensitization outcome measures: • Comparison between SLIT/Dupilumab and Double-Placebo According to the SAP, this treatment comparison at Year 3 is a key secondary endpoint and therefore a multiplicity adjustment is considered; however at Years 1 and 2 the comparisons are not adjusted for multiplicity.
Time frame: 0 to 1 hour of the NAC at Years 1 and Year 2, and at Year 3 (One Year After Completion of Treatment)
Size of Early Intradermal Skin Test Response at Years 1, 2, and 3
An intradermal skin test will be performed using Timothy grass pollen, with an early phase read-out after 15 minutes (with a +/- 3 minute window). A 10 BU test concentration will be used. The average of left and right arm wheal sizes will be used for analysis. A higher wheal size indicates a more severe reaction. The following treatment comparison is of secondary outcome interest, where Year 3 is a clinical tolerance outcome measure, and Years 1 and 2 are clinical desensitization outcome measures: • Comparison between SLIT/Dupilumab and Double-Placebo According to the SAP, this treatment comparison at Year 3 is a key secondary endpoint and therefore a multiplicity adjustment is considered; however at Years 1 and 2 the comparisons are not adjusted for multiplicity.
Time frame: Years 1 and Year 2, and at Year 3 (One Year After Completion of Treatment)
Size of Late Intradermal Skin Test Response at Years 1, 2, and 3
An intradermal skin test will be performed using Timothy grass pollen, with a late phase read-out after 6.5 hours (with a +/- 30 minute window) post initial injection. A 10 BU test concentration will be used. The average of left and right arm wheal sizes will be used for analysis. A higher wheal size indicates a more severe reaction. The following treatment comparison is of secondary outcome interest, where Year 3 is a clinical tolerance outcome measure, and Years 1 and 2 are clinical desensitization outcome measures: • Comparison between SLIT/Dupilumab and Double-Placebo According to the SAP, this treatment comparison at Year 3 is a key secondary endpoint and therefore a multiplicity adjustment is considered; however, at Years 1 and 2 the comparisons are not adjusted for multiplicity.
Time frame: Years 1 and Year 2, and at Year 3 (One Year After Completion of Treatment)
Size of Skin Prick Test Endpoint Titration Response as defined by the Provocative Concentration at 5mm (PC5) at Years 1, 2, and 3
A skin prick test endpoint titration response assessment will be performed using increasing concentrations of Timothy grass pollen, including: 10 SQ-U/mL, 100 SQ-U/mL, 1000 SQ-U/mL, 10000 SQ-U/mL, and 100000 SQ-U/mL. The average of left and right arm wheal sizes will be used for analysis. The PC5 is defined as the minimum concentration (on the base-10 log scale) for which an average wheal size of 5mm is met or exceeded, based on linear interpolation. A smaller PC5 indicates a more severe reaction. The following treatment comparison is of secondary outcome interest, where Year 3 is a clinical tolerance outcome measure, and Years 1 and 2 are clinical desensitization outcome measures: • Comparison between SLIT/Dupilumab and Double-Placebo According to the SAP, this treatment comparison at Year 3 is a key secondary endpoint and therefore a multiplicity adjustment is considered; however, at Years 1 and 2 the comparisons are not adjusted for multiplicity.
Time frame: Years 1 and Year 2, and at Year 3 (One Year After Completion of Treatment)
Weekly Seasonal Combined Symptom Medication Score (CSMS) at Years 1, 2, and 3
A participant-reported seasonal symptoms outcome calculated as an average of: a) weekly Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score and b) weekly medication score (WMS), each assessed for the 7 days prior to the assessment. The VAS is on a Likert scale (0 to 10 cm, 0=No Symptoms, 10=Worst possible symptoms), reflecting the impact of rhinitis ("hay fever") symptoms. The WMS is based on use of antihistamines (oral and/or eyedrop) and intranasal corticosteroids (score 0 to 10, 0 = medications not used this week, 10 = medications on 5 or more days this week). The following treatment comparison is of secondary outcome interest, where Year 3 is a clinical tolerance outcome measure, and Years 1 and 2 are clinical desensitization outcome measures: • Comparison between SLIT/Dupilumab and Double-Placebo This treatment comparison at Year 3 is a key secondary endpoint and therefore a multiplicity adjustment is considered; however at Years 1 and 2 the comparisons are not adjusted for multiplicity.
Time frame: Years 1 and Year 2, and at Year 3 (One Year After Completion of Treatment)
Weekly Seasonal Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 0-10 cms Score at Years 1, 2, and 3
A participant-reported (self-administered) seasonal symptoms outcome measure on a Likert scale (0 to 10 cm, 0=No Symptoms, 10=Worst possible symptoms), a quality of life measure reflecting the impact of rhinitis ("hay fever") symptoms experienced during the 7 days prior to the assessment. The following treatment comparison is of secondary outcome interest, where Year 3 is a clinical tolerance outcome measure, and Years 1 and 2 are clinical desensitization outcome measures: • Comparison between SLIT/Dupilumab and Double-Placebo According to the SAP, no comparisons at any year are adjusted for multiplicity for this outcome.
Time frame: Years 1 and Year 2, and at Year 3 (One Year After Completion of Treatment)
Weekly Seasonal Medication Score (WMS) at Years 1, 2, and 3
A participant-reported (self-administered) seasonal symptoms medications score based on the use of antihistamines (oral and/or eyedrop) and intranasal corticosteroids, assessed for the 7 days prior to the assessment. The WMS has a score ranging from 0 to 10 (0 = medications not used this week, 10 = medications on 5 or more days this week). The following treatment comparison is of secondary outcome interest, where Year 3 is a clinical tolerance outcome measure, and Years 1 and 2 are clinical desensitization outcome measures: • Comparison between SLIT/Dupilumab and Double-Placebo According to the SAP, no comparisons at any year are adjusted for multiplicity for this outcome.
Time frame: Years 1 and Year 2, and at Year 3 (One Year After Completion of Treatment)
Weekly Rhinitis Quality of Life Score Using the Juniper Mini-Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (miniRQLQ) at Years 1, 2, and 3
The Juniper Mini-Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (MiniRQLQ), is a participant-reported (self-administered) questionnaire that consists of 14 questions grouped into 5 domains. Each question is scored on a scale of 0 (not troubled with symptoms) to 6 (extremely troubled with symptoms) and describes nose/eye symptoms experienced for the 7 days prior to the assessment. A total score equal to the average of all questions will be analyzed. The following treatment comparison is of secondary outcome interest, where Year 3 is a clinical tolerance outcome measure, and Years 1 and 2 are clinical desensitization outcome measures: • Comparison between SLIT/Dupilumab and Double-Placebo According to the SAP, this treatment comparison at Year 3 is a key secondary endpoint and therefore a multiplicity adjustment is considered; however at Years 1 and 2 the comparisons are not adjusted for multiplicity.
Time frame: Years 1 and Year 2, and at Year 3 (One Year After Completion of Treatment)
Modified Rhinitis Symptom Utility Index (MRSUI) Questionnaire Measured In-Season at Years 1, 2, and 3
The Modified Rhinitis Symptom Utility Index (MRSUI) questionnaire consists of 10 questions regarding symptoms experienced during the prior 2 weeks from the nose, eyes, and throat, specifically how frequently the symptoms occurred and how bothersome they were. The total MRSUI score will be calculated as the sum of the numeric responses to all 10 questions. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome, where the maximum score is 25. The following treatment comparison is of secondary outcome interest, where Year 3 is a clinical tolerance outcome measure, and Years 1 and 2 are clinical desensitization outcome measures: • Comparison between SLIT/Dupilumab and Double-Placebo According to the SAP, this treatment comparison at Year 3 is a key secondary endpoint and therefore a multiplicity adjustment is considered; however at Years 1 and 2 the comparisons are not adjusted for multiplicity.
Time frame: Years 1 and Year 2, and at Year 3 (One Year After Completion of Treatment)
Global Evaluation Questionnaire Number 1 at Years 1, 2, and 3
Participants are asked to describe their allergic rhinitis ("hay fever"). This administered questionnaire is comprised of 6 questions, focusing on nasal and eye symptoms \[0=No symptoms, 3=Severe\]. The total Global Evaluation No. 1 score will be calculated as the total sum of the numeric responses to all 6 questions. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome/severity, where the maximum score per visit is 18. The following treatment comparison is of secondary outcome interest, where Year 3 is a clinical tolerance outcome measure, and Years 1 and 2 are clinical desensitization outcome measures: • Comparison between SLIT/Dupilumab and Double-Placebo According to the SAP, this treatment comparison at Year 3 is a key secondary endpoint and therefore a multiplicity adjustment is considered; however, at Years 1 and 2 the comparisons are not adjusted for multiplicity.
Time frame: Years 1 and Year 2, and at Year 3 (One Year After Completion of Treatment)
Global Evaluation Questionnaire Number 2 at Years 1, 2, and 3
For the Global Evaluation No. 2 questionnaire, participants are asked a single question regarding the change in current rhinitis/hay fever compared to the years prior to initiating study treatment (Much better: +3, Much worse: -3). The following treatment comparison is of secondary outcome interest, where Year 3 is a clinical tolerance outcome measure, and Years 1 and 2 are clinical desensitization outcome measures: • Comparison between SLIT/Dupilumab and Double-Placebo According to the SAP, this treatment comparison at Year 3 is a key secondary endpoint and therefore a multiplicity adjustment is considered; however at Years 1 and 2 the comparisons are not adjusted for multiplicity.
Time frame: Years 1 and Year 2, and at Year 3 (One Year After Completion of Treatment)
Frequency, Severity, and Relatedness of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) by Treatment Arm
The number and percentage of participants with at least one treatment-emergent AE in the following categories will be summarized by treatment arm: 1. any AE related to any study drug 2. any severe (Grade 3 or higher) AE Only treatment-emergent AEs will be summarized. All AEs, including local, systemic, and serious AEs will be considered. For grading severity, the protocol-specified grading criteria will be used which depends on the type of AE: * Grading Table for Local Reactions to SLIT (Grades 1-4) * Grading Table for Local Reactions to Allergen Skin Testing (Grades 1-3) * Grading Table for NAC Procedure for Local Reactions (Grades 1-4) * WAO Subcutaneous Immunotherapy Systemic Reaction Grading System (Grades 1-5) for any immediate (0-1hr) systemic allergic reaction * National Cancer Institute's (NCI's) Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (November 27, 2017; Grades 1-5) for all remaining AEs.
Time frame: Start of study treatment until completion of study participation at year 3, or until 30 days after prematurely withdrawing from the study