Subcutaneous enoxaparin is currently the gold standard for VTE chemoprophylaxis. However, the efficacy of chemoprophylaxis with subcutaneous enoxaparin is affected by patient-level factors, thus, resulting in VTE events despite guideline-compliant prophylaxis. A population at particular risk is the growing number of patients who undergo autologous breast reconstruction. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) might be a less invasive, yet, more efficacious mode of chemoprophylaxis in this patient population. Hence, the proposed work has the potential to cause a paradigm shift in chemoprophylaxis guidelines in a large population of patients undergoing plastic surgery.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
82
Patients will be assigned to the respective study groups postoperatively upon arrival in the post-anesthesia care unit. Hence, surgeons are blinded at the time of surgery as to study group assignment. Chemoprophylaxis will continue for the duration of the hospitalization.
Patients will be assigned to the respective study groups postoperatively upon arrival in the post-anesthesia care unit. Hence, surgeons are blinded at the time of surgery as to study group assignment. Chemoprophylaxis will continue for the duration of the hospitalization.
Stanford University Medical Center
Stanford, California, United States
Apixaban vs. Enoxaparin - Number of Participants With Bleeding Events
To examine the rate of bleeding events in patients receiving oral apixaban versus subcutaneous enoxaparin following microsurgical breast reconstruction
Time frame: 90-day events
Apixaban vs. Enoxaparin - Number of Participants With Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Events
To examine the rate of VTE events in patients receiving oral apixaban versus subcutaneous enoxaparin following microsurgical breast reconstruction
Time frame: 90 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.