Liberal Versus Restrictive Transfusion Threshold in Oncologic surgerY

University Hospital, Brest30 enrolled

Overview

Anemia is common in oncology. Up to three-quarters of cancer patients are exposed to an episode of anemia. In oncology surgery, perioperative bleeding is a major risk factor for anemia. Indeed, 13 to 40% of patients are transfused in perioperative oncologic surgery. There is an association between anemia and prognosis. Several epidemiological studies have shown a strong association between anemia and altered quality of life. In oncology cohort studies, anemic patients had a significantly lower quality of life compared to patients without anemia. In non-cardiac surgery, preoperative anaemia was significantly associated with post-operative mortality. There is also an association between preoperative anaemia and the occurrence of post-operative complications. In oncology surgery, cohort studies conducted in colorectal surgery and neurosurgery found an association between the occurrence of perioperative anemia and post-operative morbidity and mortality. The optimal transfusion strategy is unknown in oncology patients. Several multicentre randomised trials, conducted in resuscitation patients or in perioperative settings, have compared a "restrictive" to a "liberal" transfusion strategy. These studies did not show a superiority of one strategy over another on patient outcomes but a lower exposure to red blood cell concentrates in patients transfused with the restrictive transfusion strategy. Thus, the French High Authority for Health (HAS) has adopted a haemoglobin level of 7 g/dl as the transfusion threshold for any transfusion of red blood cell concentrate carried out in the operating theatre and in intensive care in the absence of special cases such as the presence of acute coronary syndrome. For oncology patients, no recommendation could be made due to the lack of evidence-based literature and the optimal transfusion strategy for these patients remains unknown. Only 2 monocentric trials performed in oncology (critical care and perioperative) suggest a benefit of a liberal strategy (transfusion for a haemoglobin level \< 9 g/dl) on the short-term vital prognosis, but these studies suffer from numerous limitations leaving the question unresolved. Before conducting a large phase III trial, a pilot study is needed to validate the methodology of this multicentre clinical trial and to assess its feasibility.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Age \> 18 years old * Anticipated or proven admission to immediate postoperative resuscitation after scheduled or emergency oncology surgery, for the removal of a neoplastic lesion among the following surgical procedures: * Visceral surgery: Hepatectomy, duodenopancreatectomy, gastrectomy, esophagectomy, colectomy * Urological surgery: Radical prostatectomy, cystectomy, nephrectomy. * Gynaecological surgery: Ovariectomy, hysterectomy, mastectomy, pelvectomy * Thoracic surgery: Pneumonectomy, lobectomy * ENT Surgery: Total laryngectomy, pharyngectomy, glossectomy * Spinal surgery: corporectomy wherever it is performed. * Hemoglobin level \< 9.5 g/dl between the day before surgery (D-1) and discharge from resuscitation at no more than 30 days postoperatively Exclusion Criteria: * \- Myocardial infarction and/or unstable angina in the 4 weeks prior to surgery * Refusal to participate in the study * Minor patient (age \< 18 years) * Refusal to transfuse red blood cell concentrates (Jehovah's Witness) * Pregnant or breastfeeding women * Patients under guardianship or curatorship

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Methodology of the pilot study

The difference in mean hemoglobin levels during the perioperative period up to 30 days postoperatively between the two groups will be assessed

Time frame: up to 30 days