This study will evaluate the predictive validity of a game-based screening system based on child self-report measures. The core study hypotheses are that (1) in-game assessments will predict problematic recovery (child pain and posttraumatic stress symptoms \[PTSS\]) and (2) parents in the intervention group will report greater confidence in managing child recovery.
This study will evaluate the predictive validity of a game-based screening system based on child self-report measures. The core study hypotheses are that (1) in-game assessments will predict problematic recovery (child pain and PTSS) and (2) parents in the intervention group will report greater confidence in managing child recovery. Study Design: This study is a randomized controlled trial that will examine validity of eScreen measures (primary aim) and assess the impact of the eScreen system on parent confidence in managing child symptoms and recovery (secondary aim). At T1, after baseline assessment (questionnaires), children will be randomized to the usual care plus eScreen (eScreen) or usual care alone (Usual Care) groups. In the eScreen group, children will use the game-based screening component and parents the parent information component for 6 weeks. All participants will complete follow-up research assessments by phone, online, or mail at T2 (6 weeks) and T3 (12 weeks). Following their T3 research assessment, child participants in the Usual Care group will have the option to play and provide feedback on the game (with no in-game assessment and no parent information component).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SCREENING
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
320
The eScreen system is composed of a child screening component and a parent information component. The child screening component is delivered via a game-like interface and includes assessment of current pain, PTSS, and functional recovery. Children are asked to play the game at least 3x/week. The parent information component consists of text / email messages sent to parents at least weekly that summarize child ratings and include a link to an online dashboard with additional personalized information for parents.
Kentucky Children's Hospital
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Validity of eScreen Pain Measure as Predictor of Child's Clinically Significant Pain Severity at 6 Weeks
Predictive validity - Area Under the Curve (AUC) in ROC analyses - baseline eScreen Pain Measure score predicting rating \>= 6 on 6-week Numerical Rating Scale for Pain Intensity (NRSI) Pain at baseline: eScreen Pain Measure score (0-10) On-screen visual analog 'slider' - width \& color intensity increase from bottom to top, face of child's avatar (selected by child in eScreen system) anchors lower \& upper ends of slider with validated 'no pain' and 'most pain' facial expressions. On-screen instructions: "The bottom of this scale is no pain, and the top is the most pain you can imagine. Slide the marker to show how much pain you feel right now." Child uses touch screen to slide virtual marker, system derives score from 0.000 to 10.000 based on marker location. Pain severity at 6 weeks: NRSI \>= 6 Verbally-administered, child rates pain by choosing integer from 0 to 10 "where 0 = no pain or hurt and 10 = the most or worst pain/hurt" Rating \>=6 validated as clinically significant.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Validity of eScreen Pain Measure as Predictor of Child's Clinically Significant Pain Interference at 6 Weeks
Predictive validity - Area Under the Curve (AUC) in ROC analyses - baseline eScreen Pain Measure score predicting T score \>= 65 on 6-wk PROMIS Pain Interference scale Pain at baseline: eScreen Pain Measure score (0-10) On-screen visual analog 'slider' - width \& color intensity increase from bottom to top, face of child's avatar (selected by child in eScreen system) anchors lower \& upper ends of slider with validated 'no pain' and 'most pain' facial expressions. On-screen instructions: "The bottom of this scale is no pain, and the top is the most pain you can imagine. Slide the marker to show how much pain you feel right now." Child uses touch screen to slide virtual marker, system derives score from 0.000 to 10.000 based on marker location. Pain interference at 6 weeks: PROMIS Pediatric Pain Interference T score \>=65 Brief questionnaire - Child rates pain interference with daily activities over past 7 days. Ratings lead to normed T scores where \>=65 = significant interference.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Validity of eScreen Posttraumatic Stress Screen as Predictor of Posttraumatic Stress at 6 Weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Predictive validity - Area Under the Curve (AUC) in ROC analyses - baseline eScreen PTSS Screener score predicting whether child meets symptom criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) on 6-wk Child PTSD Symptom Scale for DSM-5 \[CPSS-5\] eScreen PTSS Screener eScreen uses the Acute Stress Checklist for Children 6-item Short Form (ASC-6) to screen for posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS). Scores range from 0 to 12; higher scores indicate greater PTSS severity. Child PTSD Symptom Scale for DSM-5 (CPSS-5) 20-item questionnaire assesses DSM-5 criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), scored here to determine whether child meets symptom criteria for PTSD at 6 wks.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Validity of eScreen PTSS Screener as Predictor of Impairment From Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms at 6 Weeks
Predictive validity - Area Under the Curve (AUC) in ROC analyses - baseline eScreen PTSS Screener score predicting whether or not child reports impairment from posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) on 6-wk Child PTSD Symptom Scale for DSM-5 \[CPSS-5\] eScreen PTSS Screener eScreen uses the Acute Stress Checklist for Children 6-item Short Form (ASC-6) to screen for posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS). Scores range from 0 to 12; higher scores indicate greater PTSS severity. Child PTSD Symptom Scale for DSM-5 (CPSS-5) 7 items in the CPSS questionnaire assess impairment (in social/interpersonal or academic functioning or daily activities) related to posttraumatic stress symptoms. Impairment scored as present if child endorses impairment on any item at 6 wks.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Impact of eScreen System on Parent Confidence in Managing Child Symptoms and Recovery
Examine difference between eScreen and usual care groups on parents' self-rated confidence (at 6 weeks) related to managing child symptoms and recovery after discharge. Parent Confidence Scale - 9 Likert-scale items in which parents rate (from 1 to 5) the extent to which they have felt prepared to manage their ill or injured child's symptoms and recovery after hospital or clinic discharge. Summed total scores range from 5 to 45, higher scores indicate greater confidence.
Time frame: 6 weeks