We aim to assess the benefits and harms of higher (12 mg) vs lower doses (6 mg) of dexamethasone on patient-centered outcomes in patients with COVID-19 and severe hypoxia.
Background: Preliminary results from the Randomised Evaluation of COVid-19 thERapY (RECOVERY) trial have reported a reduction in 28-day mortality with low-dose dexamethasone (6 mg) once daily versus no intervention in hospitalised patients with COVID-19; an effect that may have been more pronounced in patients with increasing hypoxia. Yet, higher doses of dexamethasone may be beneficial in patients with non-COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. At present, it is unclear what dose of dexamethasone is most beneficial in patients with COVID-19 and severe hypoxia, and clinical equipoise exists. Objective: We aim to assess the effects of higher (12 mg) vs lower doses (6 mg) of intravenous dexamethasone on the number of days alive without life-support in adult patients with COVID-19 and severe hypoxia. Design: International, parallel-group, centrally randomised, stratified, blinded, clinical trial. Population: Adult patients with documented COVID-19 receiving at least 10 L/min of oxygen independent of delivery system OR mechanical ventilation. Experimental intervention: Dexamethasone 12 mg once daily for up to 10 days in addition to standard care. Control intervention: Dexamethasone 6 mg once daily for up to 10 days in addition to standard care. Outcomes: The primary outcome is days alive without life support (i.e. mechanical ventilation, circulatory support, or renal replacement therapy) at day 28. Secondary outcomes are serious adverse reactions (i.e. anaphylactic reaction to hydrocortisone, new episode of septic shock, invasive fungal infection or clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding) at day 28; days alive without life support at day 90; days alive and out of hospital at day 90; all-cause mortality at day 28, 90 and 180; and health-related quality of life at day 180. Sample size: A total of 1000 participants will be randomised in order to detect a 15% relative reduction in 28-day mortality combined with a 10% reduction in time on life support among the survivors with a power of 85%.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
1,000
ATC code: H02AB02
Days alive without life support at day 28
Days alive without life support (i.e. invasive mechanical ventilation, circulatory support or renal replacement therapy) from randomisation to day 28
Time frame: Day 28 after randomisation
Number of participants with one or more serious adverse reactions
Serious adverse reactions defined as new episodes of septic shock, invasive fungal infection, clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding or anaphylactic reaction
Time frame: Day 28 after randomisation
All-cause mortality at day 28
Death from all causes
Time frame: Day 28 after randomisation
All-cause mortality at day 90
Death from all causes
Time frame: Day 90 after randomisation
Days alive without life support at day 90
Days alive without life support (i.e. invasive mechanical ventilation, circulatory support or renal replacement therapy) from randomisation to day 90
Time frame: Day 90 after randomisation
Days alive and out of hospital at day 90
Number of days alive and out of hospital not limited to the index admission
Time frame: Day 90 after randomisation
All-cause mortality at day 180
Death from all causes
Time frame: Day 180 after randomisation
Health-related quality of life at day 180
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Dept. of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark.
Aalborg, Denmark
Dept. of Intensive care, Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, Denmark
Dept. of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, Denmark
Dept. of Neuroanaesthesiology
Copenhagen, Denmark
Dept. of Thoracic Anaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, Denmark
Dept of Infectious diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, Denmark
Dept. of Intensive Care, Gentofte Hospital
Hellerup, Denmark
Dept. of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Herlev Hospital
Herlev, Denmark
Dept. of Anaesthesia, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Herning
Herning, Denmark
Dept. of Intensive Care, Nordsjællands Hospital - Hillerød, Denmark.
Hillerød, Denmark
...and 43 more locations
Assessed by EQ-5D-5L
Time frame: Day 180 after randomisation
Health-related quality of life at day 180
Assessed by EQ-VAS
Time frame: Day 180 after randomisation