Artificial Pancreas - Adolescent Physiology & Psychology Longitudinal Evaluation

University of Virginia42 enrolled

Overview

This study designed to assess changes in control of Type 1 Diabetes in pubertal adolescents over a two year period. There are two arms/substudies, the first being a longitudinal randomized controlled trial and the second an observational study.

The investigators will recruit adolescents with type 1 diabetes age 11-\<13 years and one parent to participate in this 24-month study. While this is admittedly a long enrollment time, study commitments following enrollment will be limited to three in-person or video visits at yearly intervals and one virtual or in-person device training session to improve adherence. Participants must be pubertal, as puberty appears to contribute significantly to the insulin resistance that is likely related to worsened blood glucose control. Pubertal assessments will occur at yearly intervals. The first of the two arms/substudies ("Randomized" substudy) is a longitudinal randomized controlled trial for which participants will be randomized to either continue their current diabetes therapy (with the addition of use of a Dexcom CGM, forming the "Usual Care+CGM" Control Group; this includes both adolescents using non-automated insulin delivery (AID) insulin pumps or multiple daily injections \[MDI\]). The Experimental Group will use an AP system (Tandem's Control-IQ system) during the two-year duration of the study. The primary outcome of the Randomized substudy will be HbA1c between intervention groups at the 24-month visit. The second arm/substudy ("Triple Label Surveillance" substudy) is an observational study. Both arms/substudies perform a "Triple Label" mixed meal study assessing glucose flux and insulin resistance that requires visits to the Clinical Research Unit. All participants will undergo a Triple-Labeled Glucose Assessment at months 0, 12 and 24. This assessment evaluates the degree of insulin resistance including in the hepatic and peripheral compartments. During Visit 2, all participants (for both the Triple Label sub-study and the Glycemia-Only sub-study) will complete multiple questionnaires assessing aspects of adolescent psychology and sociology. HbA1c will also be collected using a local lab. The primary outcome of the study overall (combined Triple Label Surveillance and Randomized substudies) is the change in insulin resistance between baseline and the 24-month visit. CGM glucose data will be collected continuously via remote connection during the entire study. At months 6 and 18, participants will be contacted to obtain insulin management information and will have HbA1c measures assessed at a local clinic or laboratory. Additional scheduled phone calls will occur in the month before the in-person study visits to request HbA1c and confirm body composition/Triple-Labeled Glucose Assessment scheduling and discuss use of CGM and activity tracker. Participants will be contacted in the event of insufficient CGM or AP system use. For the Randomized substudy, in the Eperimental Group, insufficient use is defined as \<60% AP use over a 3-month period. For the Control Group, less than 1 month of CGM data over a 3-month period is considered insufficient. If participants do not meet minimum use criteria in 2 successive periods, the participant will be discontinued from the study. The investigators are targeting completion of 42 child/parent dyads combined between the Randomized substudy and the Triple Label Surveillance sub-study.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

OTHER

Masking

NONE

Enrollment

Conditions

Type 1 Diabetes

Interventions

Artificial Pancreas (AP)DEVICE

The AP system used in this trial is the Tandem t:slim insulin pump with Control-IQ Technology. This system is FDA approved for use starting at age 14 years.

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 11 YearsMax age: 12 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age 11 to \<13 years (at time of enrollment) with a parent/guardian (18+ yo) who is willing to participate with the child 2. At least Tanner 2 pubic hair (boys), Tanner 2 breast development (girls) 3. HbA1c \<10 clinically obtained within the last 6 weeks; if the participant is unable to go to the laboratory or clinic because of stay-at-home orders, the entry hemoglobin A1c level can be assessed via outside laboratory (e.g. LabCorp), home HbA1c device, recent clinically-obtained HbA1c in past month.. 4. Clinical diagnosis, based on investigator assessment, of type 1 diabetes for at least one year 5. Currently using insulin for at least six months 6. Both prior pump and MDI users will use insulin parameters such as carbohydrate ratio and correction factors consistently on their pump in order to dose insulin for meals or corrections 7. Access to internet and willingness to upload data during the study as needed 8. For females, not currently known to be pregnant or breastfeeding 9. If female and sexually active, must agree to use a form of contraception to prevent pregnancy while a participant in the study. A negative serum or urine pregnancy test will be required for all females of childbearing potential. Participants who become pregnant will be discontinued from the study. Also, participants who during the study develop and express the intention to become pregnant within the timespan of the study will be discontinued. 10. Willingness to suspend use of any personal CGM for the duration of the clinical trial once the study CGM is in use 11. Willingness to switch to lispro (Humalog) or aspart (Novolog) if not using already, and to use no other insulin besides lispro (Humalog) or aspart (Novolog) during the study, if randomized to the Control-IQ group. 12. Total daily insulin dose (TDD) at least 10 U/day and not more than 100 U/day 13. Willingness not to start any new non-insulin glucose-lowering agent during the course of the trial (including metformin, GLP-1 agonists, pramlintide, DPP-4 inhibitors, biguanides, sulfonylureas and naturaceuticals) 14. An understanding and willingness to follow the protocol and signed informed consent 15. Participants must have Internet access and a computer system that meets the requirements for uploading the study equipment. 16. Contact with primary diabetes physician to discuss study details and the participant's care, with study team continuing to feel that the participant is appropriate for study inclusion. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Hemoglobin A1c \>10% clinically obtained within the past 6 weeks 2. A known medical condition that in the judgment of the investigator might interfere with the completion of the protocol such as the following examples: 1. Severe renal impairment, end-stage renal disease, or dialysis 2. Inpatient psychiatric treatment in the past six months 3. Presence of a known adrenal disorder 4. Abnormal liver function test results (Transaminase\>2 times the upper limit of normal); testing required for subjects taking medications known to affect liver function or with diseases known to affect liver function 5. Uncontrolled thyroid disease 6. Concurrent use of any non-insulin glucose-lowering agent. 7. Hemophilia or any other bleeding disorder. 3. History of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in the 6 months prior to enrollment 4. Severe hypoglycemia resulting in seizure or loss of consciousness in the 6 months prior to enrollment 5. Pregnancy or intent to become pregnant during the trial 6. Currently being treated for a seizure disorder 7. Planned surgery during study duration 8. Treatment with any non-insulin glucose-lowering agent (including metformin, GLP-1 agonists, pramlintide, DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT-2 inhibitors, biguanides, sulfonylureas and naturaceuticals) 9. A known medical condition that in the judgment of the investigator might interfere with the completion of the protocol 10. Use of an insulin delivery mechanism that is not downloadable by the subject or study team 11. (Randomized substudy only) Current use of an automated insulin delivery system (besides LGS and PLGS) such as Medtronic 670G, Control-IQ or DIY system (or unwillingness to discontinue automated insulin delivery for three months before enrollment and the duration of the trial). 12. Having a family member(s) employed by Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. or Dexcom, Inc. 13. Current enrollment in another clinical trial, unless approved by the investigator of both studies or if clinical trial is a non-interventional registry trial.

Locations (1)

University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Randomized substudy: The 24-month HbA1c between AP system and Usual Care+CGM groups, performed as regression, adjusted for baseline HbA1c.

Measure of HbA1c

Time frame: 2 years

Combined Triple Label Surveillance and Randomized substudies: Change in insulin sensitivity (Si) over time

Changes in Si (from triple-label, mixed-meal test) over time between baseline and 24 months

Time frame: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months

Secondary Outcomes

Triple Label tracer (both substudies): Change in Endogenous Glucose Production (EGP)

Change in EGP over baseline, 12 and 24 months

Time frame: 24 months

Triple Label tracer (both substudies): Change in Rate of Glucose Appearance (Ra)

Change in Ra over baseline, 12 and 24 months

Time frame: 24 months

Triple Label tracer (both substudies): Change in Rate of Glucose Disappearance (Rd)

Change in Rd over baseline, 12 and 24 months

Time frame: 24 months

Randomized Substudy: Comparison of Glycemic Control (below also) - Time in range, overall

Time in range 70-180 mg/dL: overall

Time frame: 2 years

Glycemic Control - Time in range, months 0-6

Time in range 70-180 mg/dL: months 0-6

Time frame: 6 months

Glycemic Control - Time in range, months 6-12

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.

Time in range 70-180 mg/dL: months 6-12

Time frame: months 6-12

Glycemic Control - Time in range, months 12-18

Time in range 70-180 mg/dL: months 12-18

Time frame: months 12-18

Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, TDI overall

Overall total daily insulin

Time frame: 24 months

Glycemic Control - Time in range, months 18-24

Time in range 70-180 mg/dL: months 18-24

Time frame: months 18-24

Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, TDI 0-6 months

Total daily insulin, months 0-6

Time frame: 6 months

Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, TDI 6-12 months

Total daily insulin, months 6-12

Time frame: months 18-24

Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, TDI 12-18 months

Total daily insulin, months 12-18

Time frame: months 12-18

Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, TDI 18-24 months

Total daily insulin, months 18-24

Time frame: months 18-24

Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, basal insulin total

Overall total basal insulin

Time frame: 24 months

Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, basal insulin 0-6 months

Total basal insulin, months 0-6

Time frame: 6 months

Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, basal insulin 6-12 months

Total basal insulin, months 6-12

Time frame: months 6-12

Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, basal insulin 12-18 months

Total basal insulin, months 12-18

Time frame: months 12-18

Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, basal insulin 18-24 months

Total basal insulin, months 18-24

Time frame: months 18-24

Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin:carb ratio overall

Overall insulin:carb ratio

Time frame: 24 months

Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin:carb ratio 0-6 months

Insulin:carb ratio, months 0-6

Time frame: 6 months

Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin:carb ratio 6-12 months

Insulin:carb ratio, months 6-12

Time frame: months 6-12

Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin:carb ratio 12-18 months

Insulin:carb ratio, months 12-18

Time frame: months 12-18

Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin:carb ratio 18-24 months

Insulin:carb ratio, months 18-24

Time frame: months 18-24

Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin sensitivity factor overall

Overall insulin sensitivity factor

Time frame: 24 months

Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin sensitivity factor 0-6 months

Insulin sensitivity factor months 0-6

Time frame: 6 months

Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin sensitivity factor 6-12 months

Insulin sensitivity factor months 6-12

Time frame: months 6-12

Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin sensitivity factor 12-18 months

Insulin sensitivity factor months 12-18

Time frame: months 12-18

Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin sensitivity factor 18-24 months

Insulin sensitivity factor months 18-24

Time frame: months 18-24

Glycemic Control - Differences in CGM readings over prior month, Time 70-180 mg/dL

Time 70-180 mg/dL

Time frame: 24 months

Glycemic Control - Differences in CGM readings over prior month, Time <70 mg/dL

Time \<70 mg/dL

Time frame: 24 months

Glycemic Control - Differences in CGM readings over prior month, Time >180 mg/dL

Time \>180 mg/dL

Time frame: 24 months

Glycemic Control - Differences in CGM readings over prior month, Time >250 mg/dL

Time \>250 mg/dL

Time frame: 24 months

Glycemic Control - Differences in CGM readings over prior month, Number of hypoglycemia events

Number of hypoglycemia events/24 hours of CGM data available

Time frame: 24 months

Glycemic Control - Differences in CGM readings over prior month, Total daily insulin injected

Total daily insulin injected (pump users only in Usual Care+CGM group)

Time frame: 24 months

Triple Label Tracer, Difference in overall insulin sensitivity (SI) at 24 months

Difference in overall insulin sensitivity (SI) at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 2 years

Triple Label Tracer, Difference in overall insulin sensitivity (SI) at 12 months

Difference in overall insulin sensitivity (SI) at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 1 year

Randomized substudy: Triple Label Tracer, Change in insulin sensitivity (SI) at 24 months

Change in insulin sensitivity (SI) at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 2 years

Randomized substudy: Triple Label Tracer, Change in insulin sensitivity (SI) at 12 months

Change in insulin sensitivity (SI) at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 1 year

Triple Label Tracer, Difference in overall Hepatic SI at 24 months

Difference in overall Hepatic SI at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 2 years

Triple Label Tracer, Difference in overall Hepatic SI at 12 months

Difference in overall Hepatic SI at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 1 year

Triple Label Tracer, Change in overall Hepatic SI at 24 months

Change in overall Hepatic SI at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 2 years

Triple Label Tracer, Change in overall Hepatic SI at 12 months

Change in overall Hepatic SI at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 1 year

Triple Label Tracer, Difference in Peripheral SI at 24 months

Difference in Peripheral SI at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 2 years

Triple Label Tracer, Difference in Peripheral SI at 12 months

Difference in Peripheral SI at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 1 year

Triple Label Tracer, Change in Peripheral SI at 24 months

Change in Peripheral SI at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 2 years

Triple Label Tracer, Change in Peripheral SI at 12 months

Change in Peripheral SI at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 1 year

Triple Label Tracer, Difference in Endogenous glucose uptake at 24 months

Difference in Endogenous glucose uptake at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 2 years

Triple Label Tracer, Difference in Endogenous glucose uptake at 12 months

Difference in Endogenous glucose uptake at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 1 year

Triple Label Tracer, Change in Endogenous glucose uptake at 24 months

Change in Endogenous glucose uptake at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 2 years

Triple Label Tracer, Change in Endogenous glucose uptake at 12 months

Change in Endogenous glucose uptake at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 1 year

Triple Label Tracer, Difference in Glucose uptake at 24 months

Difference in Glucose uptake at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 2 years

Triple Label Tracer, Difference in Glucose uptake at 12 months

Difference in Glucose uptake at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 1 year

Triple Label Tracer, Change in Glucose uptake at 24 months

Change in Glucose uptake at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 2 years

Triple Label Tracer, Change in Glucose uptake at 12 months

Change in Glucose uptake at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 1 year

Triple Label Tracer, Difference in Meal glucose uptake at 24 months

Difference in Meal glucose uptake at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 2 years

Triple Label Tracer, Difference in Meal glucose uptake at 12 months

Difference in Meal glucose uptake at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 1 year

Triple Label Tracer, Change in Meal glucose uptake at 24 months

Change in Meal glucose uptake at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 2 years

Triple Label Tracer, Change in Meal glucose uptake at 12 months

Change in Meal glucose uptake at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 1 year

Division of diabetes management responsibilities, child, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)

Diabetes Family Responsibility Questionnaire (17 items, possible score 17-51, higher is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 24 months

Division of diabetes management responsibilities, child, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)

Diabetes Family Responsibility Questionnaire (17 items, possible score 17-51, higher is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 12 months

Division of diabetes management responsibilities, parent, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)

Diabetes Family Responsibility Questionnaire (17 items, possible score 17-51, higher is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 24 months

Division of diabetes management responsibilities, parent, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)

Diabetes Family Responsibility Questionnaire (17 items, possible score 17-51, higher is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 12 months

Family conflict, child, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)

Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (19 items, possible score 19-57, lower is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 24 months

Family conflict, child, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)

Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (19 items, possible score 19-57, lower is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 12 months

Family conflict, parent, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)

Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (19 items, possible score 19-57, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 24 months

Family conflict, parent, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)

Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (19 items, possible score 19-57, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 12 months

Peer influence, child, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)

Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (19 items, possible score 19-57, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 24 months

Peer influence, child, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)

Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (19 items, possible score 19-57, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 12 months

Diabetes distress, child, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)

Problem Areas in Diabetes, child version (26 items, possible score 26-156, lower is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 24 months

Diabetes distress, child, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)

Problem Areas in Diabetes, child version (26 items, possible score 26-156, lower is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 12 months

Diabetes distress, parent, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)

Problem Areas in Diabetes, parent version (18 items, possible score 18-54, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 24 months

Diabetes distress, parent, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)

Problem Areas in Diabetes, parent version (18 items, possible score 18-54, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 12 months

Fear of hypoglycemia, child, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)

Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (25 items, possible score 0-100, lower is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 24 months

Fear of hypoglycemia, child, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)

Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (25 items, possible score 0-100, lower is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 12 months

Fear of hypoglycemia, parent, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)

Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (25 items, possible score 0-100, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 24 months

Fear of hypoglycemia, parent, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)

Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (25 items, possible score 0-100, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 12 months

Depression, child, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)

Child Depression Inventory-II short form (12 items, possible score 0-20, lower is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 24 months

Depression, child, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)

Child Depression Inventory-II short form (12 items, possible score 0-20, lower is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 12 months

Depression in child, assessed by parent, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)

Child Depression Inventory-II parent (17 items, possible score 0-36, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 24 months

Depression in child, assessed by parent, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)

Child Depression Inventory-II parent (17 items, possible score 0-36, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 12 months

Technology acceptance, child, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)

INsulin delivery Systems, Perceptions, Ideas, Reflections and Expectations, child version (17 items, possible score 0-100, higher is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 24 months

Technology acceptance, child, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)

INsulin delivery Systems, Perceptions, Ideas, Reflections and Expectations, child version (17 items, possible score 0-100, higher is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 12 months

Technology acceptance, parent, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)

INsulin delivery Systems, Perceptions, Ideas, Reflections and Expectations, parent version (21 items, possible score 0-100, higher is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 24 months

Technology acceptance, parent, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)

INsulin delivery Systems, Perceptions, Ideas, Reflections and Expectations, parent version (21 items, possible score 0-100, higher is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 12 months

Health-related quality of life, child, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)

T1D and Life, youth version (23 items, possible score 0-2500, higher is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 24 months

Health-related quality of life, child, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)

T1D and Life, youth version (23 items, possible score 0-2500, higher is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 12 months

Health-related quality of life, parent, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)

T1D and Life, parent version (30 items, possible score 0-2500, higher is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 24 months

Health-related quality of life, parent, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)

T1D and Life, parent version (30 items, possible score 0-2500, higher is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

Time frame: 12 months

Both substudies: Change in HbA1c

Change in HbA1c over baseline, 12 and 24 months

Time frame: 24 months

Both substudies: Change in percent time-in-range 70-180 mg/dL (TIR)

Change in TIR over baseline, 12 and 24 months

Time frame: 24 months

Both substudies: Change in percent time >180 mg/dL

Change in percent time \>180 mg/dL over baseline, 12 and 24 months

Time frame: 24 months

Both substudies: Change in percent time <70 mg/dL

Change in percent time \<70 mg/dL over baseline, 12 and 24 months

Time frame: 24 months