Open label study with peanut oral immunotherapy (OIT). Peanut allergic children aged 1-3 years of age will be randomized 2:1 to: 1. Peanut OIT with slow up-dosing (40-60 weeks) up to a maintenance dose of 285 mg daily oral peanut protein or 2. Control group with peanut allergic children who do not undergo OIT. 3. In addition, a group of healthy children without allergic diseases will be included in the study. The primary outcome is tolerance to at least 750 mg peanut protein at a challenge after 3 years and sustained unresponsiveness (i.e. tolerance) to 750 mg peanut protein after 3 years of OIT followed by 4-6 weeks of avoidance. Efficacy and safety will be compared between group 1 and 2. Group 3 is a control group for analyses of immunological markers.
Problem: Today there is no clinically available treatment for peanut allergy. Oral Immunotherapy (OIT) studies have shown promising results, particularly in younger children (\<4 years). Intervention: Peanut OIT in children aged 1-3 years with peanut allergy (clinical symptoms at peanut challenge and IgE \>0.1 kU /l to peanut and/or Ara h 2). Comparison: Three groups are compared. Peanut allergic children are randomized 2:1 to group 1 (active OIT) or group 2 (control). Group 3 consists of age-matched non-allergic children: Group 1; Children with peanut allergy receiving peanut OIT, slow up-dosing, 40-60 weeks, until the maintenance dose 285 mg peanut protein. Three years' treatment. (n=50 patients) Group 2; Age-matched children with peanut allergy who do not undergo OIT peanut (peanut avoidance group). Peanut challenges are performed one and three years after inclusion. (n=25 patients) Group 3; Healthy, non-allergic, age-matched children. No challenges are performed in this group. (n=30 patients) Group 4; Children not reacting at the baseline peanut challenge (n=9 patients) Inclusion of study subjects: A review of samples sent to the Karolinska University Laboratory for IgE-ab responses to peanut/Ara h 2 for children in the Stockholm area aged 1-3 years is used for identification of potential participants to whom a letter is sent with information about the study. The families are randomized 2:1 to OIT or control group, group 1 or group 2. Children without allergies, healthy controls (group 3), will be included from Västerås Hospital. If children are included in the study but they do not not react at the baseline peanutchallenge, they will not have any intervention (are not eligible to randomisation) and will have a follow-up after 1+3 years (without peanut challenges), group 4. Outcomes: The primary outcome is defined as sustained unresponsiveness to 750 mg peanut protein (cumulative dose) at an open oral peanut challenge after 3 years of OIT followed by 4-6 weeks of avoidance (group 1 and 2). Secondary outcomes are adverse events among peanut allergic children with/without OIT treatment (group 1 and 2), and changes in quality of life parameters and immunological markers (group, 1, 2, 3).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
114
OIT peanut with slow-updosing for 40-60 weeks followed by maintenance. 3 years treatment.
Forskningsenheten Södersjukhuset
Stockholm, Sweden
Sustained unresponsiveness to 750 mg peanut protein
Sustained unresponsiveness to 750 mg peanut protein (cumulative dose) at a peanut challenge after 3 years of OIT and 4-6 weeks of peanut avoidance. Measured at a peanut challenge
Time frame: 3 years and 4-6 weeks
Adverse events during OIT treatment
Adverse events among peanut allergic children with OIT treatment
Time frame: 3 years
Quality of Life Before, during and after OIT peanut
Examine how quality of life, measured with Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire-parental Form (FAQLQ-PF), is affected in families with peanut allergic children undergoing peanut OIT compared to those without peanut OIT. FAQLQ-PF has questions for food-allergy specific QoL with general emotional impact; food anxiety; social and dietary limitations. The FAQLQ-PF has a seven-point scale ranging from 0 (no impact on HRQL) to 6 (extreme impact on HRQL).Overall and domain-specific HRQL scores will be calculated. Higher scores mean a worse outcome and a score of ≥ ±0.5 will be considered clinically relevant.
Time frame: 3 years
Intestinal microbiome
The gut microbiome will be investigated with sequencing-based methods to monitor possible changes in the gut microbiota composition and function related to OIT treatment. This will be compared to samples from the non-allergic individuals (reference).
Time frame: 3 years
Immunological biomarkers
To study differerent immunological biomarkers (e.g. T-helper cell-population and polarization and IgE levels) before, during and after OIT treatment and compare this to healthy controls. Immunological marker in mononuclear cells in peripheral blood will be analyzed ex vivo with flowcytometri and RNA-sequensingplatforms. Cirkulating immunological factors, e.g. cytokines and chemocines will be analyzed in plasma with ELISA-based methods.Mononuclear cellpopulations in periferal blood will be exposed to different stimuli (such as peanut, anti-C D3/C D28) in vitro, type anf level of reaction in the different cellpopulations will be monitored at mRNA- och protein-level.
Time frame: 3 years
Tolerance to peanut protein at a challenge after 3 years
Is OIT peanut with a low dose and slow up dosing strategy in young peanut allergic Children safe and effective? Measured at a peanut challenge
Time frame: 3 years
Tolerance to peanut protein at a challenge after 1 year
Is OIT peanut with a low dose and slow up dosing strategy in young peanut allergic children safe and effective? Measured at a peanut challenge
Time frame: 1 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.