Evaluation of a Health Monitoring Platform for Elderly in Home Care Context

Rennes University Hospital30 enrolled

Overview

This study aims at, as a primary objective, studying acceptability of elderly about a health monitoring platform for home support and home care. The secondary objective consists in studying the correlation of different health data evolution and the frailty trajectory of the subject.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

Purpose

OTHER

Masking

NONE

Enrollment

Conditions

Aging Frailty

Interventions

Health monitorsDEVICE

* The connected scale (iHealth HS2) measures weight from 5 to 180kg and BMI. * The connected actimeter (iHealth AM4) monitors activity (number of steps, distance, calories), sleep (automatic sleep recognition, effective sleep time, number of awakenings) and swimming (automatic activity recognition, session duration, swim type recognition and number of laps). * The connected blood pressure monitor (iHealth Track KN-550BT)is a medical device that measures blood pressure and pulse rate. * The activity monitor (manufactured by RF Track) consists of a housing that can be positioned as a pendant or at the hip. It includes an accelerometer, gyroscope, magnetometer, barometer, radio transceiver, and led. The sensor records the raw signals. * The touchpad allows the subject to connect to the Calliope app. This app allows the data recovery, storage, analysis, visualization, and all the required settings for the platform to work together.

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 80 YearsHealthy volunteers:

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Age ≥ 80 years old * Living at home or in senior residence * Evaluated as being robust according to the Fried's frailty test (0 met criteria) * Affiliated or beneficiary of a social protection scheme * Having given written consent Exclusion Criteria: * Hospitalization during the month preceding the first visit * Subject suffering from cognitive disorders preventing proper use of the device * Subject being unable to give by himself / herself his / her consent to participate in the trial * Person subject to legal protection (safeguard of justice, trusteeship, guardianship, persons deprived of liberty)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Beliefs modified questionnaire

questionnaire by Fishbein \& Ajzen (1975), is a qualitative questionnaire, with no scoring

Time frame: 1 month

UTAUT modified questionnaire

questionnaire by Venkatesh et al. (2003) Final score is graded 1 to 10, 10 being the best score

Time frame: 1 month

Usability SUS questionnaire

questionnaire by Brooks (1996) Final score is graded 10 to 70, 70 being the best score

Time frame: 1 month

Comfort modified questionnaire

questionnaire by Knight \& Baber (2005) Final score is graded 11 to 77, 77 being the best score

Time frame: 1 month

Secondary Outcomes

Motivation modified questionnaire

questionnaire by Deci \& Ryan (1987), is a qualitative questionnaire, with no scoring

Time frame: inclusion

Beliefs modified questionnaire

questionnaire by Fishbein \& Ajzen (1975), is a qualitative questionnaire, with no scoring

Time frame: inclusion

Beliefs modified questionnaire

a priori acceptability questionnaire by Fishbein \& Ajzen (1975), is a qualitative questionnaire, with no scoring

Time frame: 12 months

Beliefs modified questionnaire

a priori acceptability questionnaire by Fishbein \& Ajzen (1975), is a qualitative questionnaire, with no scoring

Central Contacts

Dominique SOMME, MD, PhD

CONTACT

0033299286905 dominique.somme@chu-rennes.fr

Fabien LEMOINE

CONTACT

fabien.lemoine@univ-rennes1.fr

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.