Recent hypertension guidelines recommend combination therapy as initial treatment for many or most patients. Several trials suggest triple low-dose combination therapy may be highly effective in terms of achieving blood pressure (BP) control without increasing adverse effects. This trial is designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of GMRx2 in participants with high blood pressure compared to dual combinations.
TRIAL DRUG: GMRx2: Single pill combinations of telmisartan/amlodipine/indapamide Dose version 2: telmisartan 20mg/amlodipine 2.5mg/indapamide 1.25mg Dose version 3: telmisartan 40mg/amlodipine 5 mg/indapamide 2.5mg INDICATION: Hypertension TRIAL DESIGN: International, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active controlled, parallel-group. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy and safety of GMRx2 compared to dual combinations INTERVENTION: Single-Blind Active Run-In Period. Enrolled participants will be asked to discontinue their current BP-lowering drug(s) and undergo a single-blind active run-in period for 4 weeks with GMRx2 dose version 2. Participants will be advised to take the capsule once daily in the morning at approximately the same time each day. For days on which BP is being measured, the capsule should be taken directly after the morning home BP measurement. Double-Blind Treatment Period. Participants still eligible after the run-in period will be allocated in a double-blind fashion to one of the following 4 randomized groups: GMRx2 dose version 2, or telmisartan 20mg+amlodipine2.5mg, or telmisartan 20mg+indapamide 1.25mg, or amlodipine 2.5mg+indapamide 1.25mg. At week 6 all doses will be doubled.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
1,385
Single pill
Single pill
oral tablet
Difference in Change in Home Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Randomization to Week 12
The primary outcome measure is difference in change in average home SBP for GMRx2 vs each dual combination evaluated from randomization to Week 12. The change in home SBP from randomization for all treatment arms was measured using least squares (LS) mean change. The pairwise comparisons between GMRx2 and dual treatments in change in home SBP were estimated using LS means difference and are described in the statistical analysis.
Time frame: Week 12
Difference in Change in Clinic Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Randomization to Week 12
Difference in change in average clinic SBP for GMRx2 vs each dual combination was evaluated from randomization to Week 12.
Time frame: Week 12
Difference in Change in Clinic Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Randomization to Week 6
Difference in change in average clinic SBP for GMRx2 vs each dual combination was evaluated from randomization to Week 6.
Time frame: Week 6
Difference in Change in Clinic Seated Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) From Randomization to Week 12
Difference in change in average clinic DBP for GMRx2 vs each dual combination was evaluated from randomization to Week 12.
Time frame: Week 12
Difference in Change in Clinic Seated Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) From Randomization to Week 6
Difference in change in average clinic DBP for GMRx2 vs each dual combination was evaluated from randomization to Week 6.
Time frame: Week 6
Percentage of Participants With Clinic Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) <140 and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) <90 mmHg at Week 12
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
oral tablet
oral tablet
oral tablet
oral tablet
oral tablet
Elite Clinical Studies
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Headlands Research
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Quality of Life Medical & Research Associates
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Valiance Clinical Research
South Gate, California, United States
Valiance Clinical Research
Tarzana, California, United States
Clinical Research of Brandon
Brandon, Florida, United States
Inpatient Research Clinic
Hialeah, Florida, United States
Multi-Speciality Research Associates
Lake City, Florida, United States
Suncoast Research Group
Miami, Florida, United States
New Horizon Research Center
Miami, Florida, United States
...and 79 more locations
The percentage of participants achieving averaged clinic SBP \<140 mmHg and DBP \<90 mmHg at Week 12 was evaluated.
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Clinic Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) <140 and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) <90 mmHg at Week 6
The percentage of participants achieving averaged clinic SBP \<140 mmHg and DBP \<80 mmHg at Week 6 was evaluated.
Time frame: Week 6
Percentage of Participants With Clinic Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) <130 and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) <80 mmHg at Week 12
The percentage of participants achieving averaged clinic SBP \<130 mmHg and DBP \<80 mmHg at Week 12 was evaluated.
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Clinic Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) <130 and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) <80 mmHg at Week 6
The percentage of participants achieving averaged clinic SBP \<130 mmHg and DBP \<80 mmHg at Week 6 was evaluated.
Time frame: Week 6
Difference in Change in Home Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Randomization to Week 6
Difference in change in average home SBP for GMRx2 vs each dual combination was evaluated from randomization to Week 6.
Time frame: Week 6
Difference in Change in Home Seated Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) From Randomization to Week 12
Difference in change in average home DBP for GMRx2 vs each dual combination was evaluated from randomization to Week 12.
Time frame: Week 12
Difference in Change in Home Seated Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) From Randomization to Week 6
Difference in change in average home DBP for GMRx2 vs each dual combination was evaluated from randomization to Week 6.
Time frame: Week 6
Difference in Change in Trough Home Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Randomization to Week 12
Difference in change in trough home SBP for GMRx2 vs each dual combination was evaluated from randomization to Week 12. Trough values were measured before morning dose of the study medication.
Time frame: Week 12
Difference in Change in Trough Home Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Randomization to Week 6
Difference in change in trough home SBP for GMRx2 vs each dual combination was evaluated from randomization to Week 6. Trough values were measured before morning dose of the study medication.
Time frame: Week 6
Percentage of Participants With Home Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) <135 and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) <85 mmHg at Week 12
The percentage of participants achieving averaged home SBP \<135 mmHg and DBP \<85 mmHg at week 12 was calculated.
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Home Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) <135 and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) <85 mmHg at Week 6
The percentage of participants achieving averaged home SBP \<135 mmHg and DBP \<85 mmHg at Week 6 was evaluated.
Time frame: Week 6
Percentage of Participants With Home Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) <130 and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) <80 mmHg at Week 12
The percentage of participants achieving averaged home SBP \<130 mmHg and DBP \<80 mmHg at Week 12 was evaluated.
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Home Seated Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) <130 and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) <80 mmHg at Week 6
The percentage of participants achieving averaged home SBP \<130 mmHg and DBP \<80 mmHg at Week 6 was evaluated.
Time frame: Week 6