This study is a prospective randomized controlled study of patients who come to the University and non-surgical root canal retreatment is considered as the election of choice in presence of periapical disease. The aim is to evaluate the success rate of non-surgical retreatment performed in one compared to two visit treatment up to 10 years of follow-up. The null hypothesis is that there will be no statistically significant differences in rates of success, when performing root canal non-surgical retreatment in one or two visits.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
110
Non-surgical root canal retreatment
Universitat Internacional de Catalunya
Sant Cugat del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain
RECRUITINGClinical post-operative pain
VAS score (0-10) of patient' level of pain, from no pain to extreme pain
Time frame: Immediately post treatment
Clinical post-operative pain
VAS score (0-10) of patient' level of pain, from no pain to extreme pain
Time frame: 4 hours post-treatment
Clinical post-operative pain
VAS score (0-10) of patient' level of pain, from no pain to extreme pain
Time frame: 24 hours post treatment
Clinical post-operative pain
VAS score (0-10) of patient' level of pain, from no pain to extreme pain
Time frame: 48 hours post treatment
Clinical signs or symptoms of periapical disease 1
Absence/presence of clinical signs or symptoms of periapical disease
Time frame: 1 year
Clinical signs or symptoms of periapical disease 2
Absence/presence of clinical signs or symptoms of periapical disease
Time frame: 2 years
Clinical signs or symptoms of periapical disease 4
Absence/presence of clinical signs or symptoms of periapical disease
Time frame: 4 years
Clinical signs or symptoms of periapical disease 6
Absence/presence of clinical signs or symptoms of periapical disease
Time frame: 6 years
Clinical signs or symptoms of periapical disease 10
Absence/presence of clinical signs or symptoms of periapical disease
Time frame: 10 years
Radiographic periapical absence/presence of radiographic apical periodontitis
Absence/presence of radiographic apical periodontitis + PAI changes when compared with post-treatment radiograph
Time frame: 1 year
Radiographic periapical absence/presence/changes in radiographic apical periodontitis
Absence/presence of radiographic apical periodontitis + PAI changes when compared with post-treatment radiograph
Time frame: 2 years
Radiographic periapical absence/presence/changes in radiographic apical periodontitis
Absence/presence of radiographic apical periodontitis + PAI changes when compared with post-treatment radiograph
Time frame: 4 years
Radiographic periapical absence/presence/changes in radiographic apical periodontitis
Absence/presence of radiographic apical periodontitis + PAI changes when compared with post-treatment radiograph
Time frame: 6 years
Radiographic periapical absence/presence/changes in radiographic apical periodontitis
Absence/presence of radiographic apical periodontitis + PAI changes when compared with post-treatment radiograph
Time frame: 10 years
Correlation of prognostic factors and clinical signs or symptoms of periapical disease 1
Correlation of pre-treatment symptomatology, post-operative pain, radiographic periapical lesion size, being an abutment, and presence of antagonist, in relation to having clinical signs or symptoms of periapical disease
Time frame: 1 year
Correlation of prognostic factors and clinical signs or symptoms of periapical disease 2
Correlation of pre-treatment symptomatology, post-operative pain, radiographic periapical lesion size, being an abutment, and presence of antagonist, in relation to having clinical signs or symptoms of periapical disease
Time frame: 2 years
Correlation of prognostic factors and clinical signs or symptoms of periapical disease 4
Correlation of pre-treatment symptomatology, post-operative pain, radiographic periapical lesion size, being an abutment, and presence of antagonist, in relation to having clinical signs or symptoms of periapical disease
Time frame: 4 years
Correlation of prognostic factors and clinical signs or symptoms of periapical disease 6
Correlation of pre-treatment symptomatology, post-operative pain, radiographic periapical lesion size, being an abutment, and presence of antagonist, in relation to having clinical signs or symptoms of periapical disease
Time frame: 6 years
Correlation of prognostic factors and clinical signs or symptoms of periapical disease 10
Correlation of pre-treatment symptomatology, post-operative pain, radiographic periapical lesion size, being an abutment, and presence of antagonist, in relation to having clinical signs or symptoms of periapical disease
Time frame: 10 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.