Testing of the Integrated Rapid Access to HIV Prevention Program for People Who Inject Drugs Program

Overview

This is a pilot study of an integrated rapid access HIV prevention program for People who inject drugs (PWID) called iRaPID. The program incorporates same-day access to Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) and Opioid Agonist Therapy (OAT).

A Hybrid type 1 implementation science design,will be used to pilot test the APN-led iRaPID program while exploring information on its implementation at multiple time points through the study. The hybrid type 1 pilot trial provides an implementation heuristic to assess potential research questions, perhaps more comprehensively, accurately and certainly earlier than could be achieved in a sequential 'intervention-then-preliminary-pilot study' strategy. In this hybrid type 1 pilot trial, the RCT will be utilized to: * Examine feasibility and acceptability among PWID and clinical stakeholders for an adapted APN-delivered, rapid HIV prevention program for PWID (iRaPID) that integrates same-day PrEP and OAT. * Estimate the preliminary efficacy of PrEP and OAT uptake in a pilot randomized controlled trial of the iRaPID vs. treatment as usual strategy in PWID without HIV. To assess future scale-up factors, the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) will be utilized with the nominal group technique (NGT). It is a conceptual framework developed to guide the assessment of multilevel implementation contexts. The CFIR framework was selected because it provides a structured menu of constructs associated with effective implementation. It consists of 5 domains with 39 underlying constructs. As recommended by Damschroder, in this study 8 CFIR constructs based on the relevancy will be measured. During the NGT, participants will be asked questions related to the multi-level implementation factors that will be based on the sample guide available on http://cfirguide.org but tailored for PWID. After posing each question, participants silently generate individual ideas. Then, using a round-robin elicitation process, each person contributes ideas that are recorded visually. They then engage in group discussion to clarify and evaluate the ideas. Items are then grouped by consensus with duplicate items removed. Then, each participant casts three votes on items as they deem them important. Votes are immediately tallied, ranked based on total number of votes, and the facilitator leads a final discussion to review the results. Sessions will take 60 minutes and be audio-recorded and transcribed.

Conditions

Interventions

Eligibility

Locations (1)

Outcomes