The investigators will evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of Motion Style Acupuncture Treatment (MSAT) therapy for acute neck pain compared to acupuncture.
This is a multi-center, randomized, controlled, comparative effectiveness clinical trial for acute neck pain. Motion style acupuncture requires a part of the patient's body to move passively or actively while acupuncture needles are retained.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
128
MSAT required a part of the patient's body to move passively or actively while acupuncture needles are retained.
General acupuncture
Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine
Seoul, Gangnam-Gu, South Korea
Bucheon Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine
Bucheon-si, Gyeonggi Province, South Korea
Haeundae Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine
Busan, South Korea
Daejeon Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine
Daejeon, South Korea
Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) on movement
Minimum 0, Maximum 100. Higher values represent a worse outcome
Time frame: Change from baseline VAS at 3 weeks
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) on movement
Minimum 0, Maximum 100. Higher values represent a worse outcome
Time frame: Baseline(Week 1), Week 2, 3, 8
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at rest
Minimum 0, Maximum 100. Higher values represent a worse outcome
Time frame: Baseline(Week 1), Week 2, 3, 8
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) on movement
Minimum 0, Maximum 10. Higher values represent a worse outcome
Time frame: Baseline(Week 1), Week 2, 3, 8
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at rest
Minimum 0, Maximum 10. Higher values represent a worse outcome
Time frame: Baseline(Week 1), Week 2, 3, 8
Vernon-Mior Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Functional disability questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline(Week 1), Week 2, 3, 8
Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPQ)
Functional disability questionnaire and Pain questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline(Week 1), Week 2, 3, 8
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Global, patient-reported outcome, Minimum 1, Maximum 7, Higher values represent a better outcome
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Week 3, 8
Range of movement (ROM) of flexion
Range of movement of flexion
Time frame: Baseline(Week 1), Week 2, 3, 8
Range of movement (ROM) of extension
Range of movement of extension
Time frame: Baseline(Week 1), Week 2, 3, 8
Range of movement (ROM) of Rt rotation
Range of movement of Right rotation
Time frame: Baseline(Week 1), Week 2, 3, 8
Range of movement (ROM) of Lt rotation
Range of movement of Left rotation
Time frame: Baseline(Week 1), Week 2, 3, 8
Range of movement (ROM) of Lt lateroflexion
Range of movement of Left lateroflexion
Time frame: Baseline(Week 1), Week 2, 3, 8
Range of movement (ROM) of Rt lateroflexion
Range of movement of Right lateroflexion
Time frame: Baseline(Week 1), Week 2, 3, 8
EQ-5D-5L
Health-related quality of life questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline(Week 1), 3, 8
12-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12)
Health-related quality of life questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline(Week 1), 3, 8
EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS)
Health-related quality of life questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline(Week 1), 3, 8
Adverse events
Safety outcome
Time frame: Time Frame: Baseline (Week 1), Week 2, 3, 8 (every visit)
Drug Consumption
Drug type and dose of prescribe for medicine or rescue medicine, and type and frequency of other treatments
Time frame: Time Frame: Baseline (Week 1), Week 2, 3, 8 (every visit)