The study consists of a retrospective observational, multicenter study in which the fundamental exposure factor being investigated is a drug (rucaparib). A clinical database will be built including clinical data in three scenarios of rucaparib treatment: (1) platinum-sensitive BRCA-mutated patients after progression, (2) maintenance therapy in patients after a platinum-sensitive relapse in response, and (3) treatment therapy in BRCA-mutated patients who are currently platinum-resistant. The specific objectives of the study are: * To describe patient characteristics/medical history, safety, efficacy, and dosing of on-label treatment with rucaparib in real-world patients (real-world data). * To describe patient characteristics/medical history, safety, efficacy, and dosing of all patients treated with rucaparib (including patients with on-label treatment and others) in real-world patients (real-world data). * To show that data obtained in clinical trials could be reproduced in non-screened patients.
An observational study (GEICO 87-R) was performed in high-grade ovarian cancer patients treated within the rucaparib access program (RAP) in Spain. The aim was to better understand rucaparib's management in real-life setting, to optimize future use, considering Pt-sensitive and Pt-resistant BRCAmut treatment and maintenance patients. A retrospective study was performed at 22 GEICO hospitals in Spain that treated patients within RAP (600 mg BID) since September 2018. Adult women with high-grade epithelian ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer, with medical record available, were included. Patient characteristics, medical history, safety, efficacy, and dosing data were collected. The setting of this observational study was rucaparib's access program (RAP) in Spain, in the context of real-life use of the product.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
51
Participating local sites (GEICO-associated hospitals with expertise in gynecological cancer management) will enter clinical data of those patients who have previously participated in the rucaparib access program (RAP) in Spain and have given their consent.
Hospital Torrecárdenas
Almería, Andalusia, Spain
Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria
Málaga, Andalusia, Spain
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
Seville, Andalusia, Spain
Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Valme
Seville, Andalusia, Spain
Hospital General San Jorge
Huesca, Aragon, Spain
Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa
Zaragoza, Aragon, Spain
Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet
Zaragoza, Aragon, Spain
Hospital Universitario Son Espases
Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain
Hospital Universitario de Araba Txagorritxu
Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain
Hospital del Mar
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
...and 13 more locations
Number of Participants With Relevant Co-morbidities
Patient characteristics and medical history Detected diseases include: arterial hypertension, diabetes melliutus, COPD, ischemic cardiomyopathy, cerebrovascular disease, obesity, etc. Measurements were done at baseline
Time frame: 0 months - Measurements were done at baseline
Other Previous Cancers?
Patient characteristics and medical history. Descriptive statistics: Other cancers present during trial including endometrial, breast , colorrectal, lung or other cancers Measurements were done at baseline
Time frame: 0 months - Measurements were done at baseline
Family History of Cancers?
Patient characteristics and medical history Family history of other cancers including ovarian, breast and others Measurements were done at baseline
Time frame: 0 months - Measurements were done at baseline
FIGO STAGE
Stage = tumor size and location; higher stage = more spread metastasis I Tumor confined to the corpus uteri IA No or less than half myometrial invasion IB Invasion equal to or more than half of the myometrium IC IA+IB + ascites IC1 surgical spill IC2 Capsule rupture before surgery or tumor on ovarian surface II Tumor invades cervical stroma, but does not extend beyond the uterus III Local and/or regional spread of the tumor IIIA Tumor invades the serosa of the corpus uteri and/or adnexae IIIA2 involvement of uterine subserosa or spread through uterine serosa IIIB Vaginal involvement and/or parametrial involvement IIIC Metastases to pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph nodes IIIC1 Positive pelvic nodes IIIC2 Positive para-aortic nodes with or without positive pelvic lymph nodes IV Tumor invades bladder and/or bowel mucosa, and/or distant metastases IVA Tumor invasion of bladder and/or bowel mucosa IVB Distant metastasis (intra-abdominal metastases and/or inguinal nodes)
Time frame: 0 months - Measurements were done at baseline
Tumor Histology
Patient characteristics and medical history Tumor histology history Measurements were done at baseline
Time frame: 0 months - Measurements were done at baseline
BCRA Status
Patient characteristics and medical history mutational status (BRCA 1/2 \[germline/somatic\] and in other HRR genes) Measurements were done at baseline
Time frame: 0 months - Measurements were done at baseline
Deficiencies in Other Genes Involved in Homologous Recombination
Patient characteristics and medical history Other HRR deficiencies including RAD51C, RAD51D, PALBB2, BRIP1, CHEK1, CHEK2, BARD1, FAM175A, NEN, ATM, EMSY and others Measurements were done at baseline
Time frame: 0 months - Measurements were done at baseline
Surgeries Before Rucaparib
Patient characteristics and medical history Total number of surgeries per patient before treatment started Measurements were done at baseline
Time frame: 0 months - Measurements were done at baseline
Previous Lines
Patient characteristics and medical history: Prior lines of platinum-based chemotherapy
Time frame: 0-24 months
PARPi Before Rucaparib
Patient characteristics and medical history: PARPi treatment before rucaparib Measurements were done at baseline
Time frame: 0 months - Measurements were done at baseline
Average Dose of Rucaparib Received Per 12 Hours
Rucaparib dosing data Descrption: average dose of rucaparib administered (mg/12h)
Time frame: 0-12 months
Rucaparib Drug Exposure
Rucaparib dosing data: mean starting dose, number of dose reductions, reasons for reductions, number of treatment discontinuations, reasons for discontinuations, duration of treatment, and switching of maintenance therapy to another PARP inhibitor (including reasons for switching). Rucaparib drug exposure in months Patient 14-001 has been eliminated for not following the treatment scheme
Time frame: 0-24 months
Dose Reductions
Rucaparib dosing data: mean starting dose, number of dose reductions, reasons for reductions, number of treatment discontinuations, reasons for discontinuations, duration of treatment, and switching of maintenance therapy to another PARP inhibitor (including reasons for switching). Specific description: How many dose reductions had to be conducted on each patient \*Patient 14-001 from treatment group has been eliminated by not following the tratment scheme
Time frame: 0-12 months
Number of Dose Interruptions
Rucaparib dosing data: mean starting dose, number of dose reductions, reasons for reductions, number of treatment discontinuations, reasons for discontinuations, duration of treatment, and switching of maintenance therapy to another PARP inhibitor (including reasons for switching). Specific description: How many dose interruptions had to be conducted on each patient \*Patient 14-001 from treatment group has been eliminated by not following the tratment scheme
Time frame: 0-12 months
Duration of Response (DoR)
Rucaparib efficacy data: best response rates in the treatment indication patients, duration of response and PFS in the treatment indication patients, PFS in the maintenance indication patients, radiological response to chemotherapy in maintenance patients (and impact of response on patient evolution). For maintenance patients: Duration of response has been calculated taking into account the date of CR or RP prior to RAP until progression (on last follow date) during Rucaparib as a maintenance treatment. For treatment patients: Duration of response has been calculated taking into account the best response date (PR or CR) during Rucaparib until progression of follow-up date (Only patients with PR or CR as best overall response)
Time frame: 0-36 months
End of Treatment
Rucaparib dosing data: mean starting dose, number of dose reductions, reasons for reductions, number of treatment discontinuations, reasons for discontinuations, duration of treatment, and switching of maintenance therapy to another PARP inhibitor (including reasons for switching). Description: Rucaparib exposure termination (reasons)
Time frame: 0-24 months
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Rucaparib efficacy data ORR: Confirmed best overall tumor response of CR or PR according to RECIST v1.1 or Response and normalization or Response according to Rustin criteria. The RECIST v1.1 answer prevailed over the Rustin criterion answer except where RECIST is 'Not assessable' and Rustin criterion is different than 'Not assessable'. ORR was calculated only on the treatment population and not on the maintenance population. \*This measurement was only taken in participants from the treatment group as these present an active disease, therefore Rucaparib was administered in order to reduce tumoral charge or control tumor progression. On the other hand, participants from the maintenance group have already responded to previous treatments, and rucaparib was administered I order to maintain response rate and/or delay progression, which was measured using "free-progression survival".
Time frame: 0-24 months
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Rucaparib efficacy data: best response rates in the treatment indication patients, duration of response and PFS in the treatment indication patients, PFS in the maintenance indication patients, radiological response to chemotherapy in maintenance patients (and impact of response on patient evolution). It represents the length of time during and after treatment that a patient lives with the disease, but without it getting worse.
Time frame: 0-24 months
Radiological Best Overall Response
Rucaparib efficacy data Radiological best overall response - Only 19 radiologically evaluable patients (treatment group only) \*This measurement was only taken in participants from the treatment group as these present an active disease, therefore Rucaparib was administered in order to reduce tumoral charge or control tumor progression. On the other hand, participants from the maintenance group have already responded to previous treatments, and rucaparib was administered I order to maintain response rate and/or delay progression, which was measured using "free-progression survival".
Time frame: 0-24 months
Biological Best Overall Response
Rucaparib efficacy data: best response rates in the treatment indication patients, duration of response and PFS in the treatment indication patients, PFS in the maintenance indication patients, radiological response to chemotherapy in maintenance patients (and impact of response on patient evolution). Biological best overall response - Only 16 assessable patients (Treatment arm only) \*This measurement was only taken in participants from the treatment group as these present an active disease, therefore Rucaparib was administered in order to reduce tumoral charge or control tumor progression. On the other hand, participants from the maintenance group have already responded to previous treatments, and rucaparib was administered I order to maintain response rate and/or delay progression, which was measured using "free-progression survival".
Time frame: 0-24 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.