The Use of Low Intensity Shock Wave Therapy for the Treatment of Provoked Vestibulodynia Disorder (PVD)

Overview

Provoked vestibulodynia (PVD) is an exhausting pain syndrome that immensely affects quality of sexual life, and consequently negatively affects quality of life. Low intensity shock wave therapy produces physical forces that lead to pain relief. Aim: To evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of low-intensity shockwave therapy in patients with provoked vestibulodynia. Methods: A double-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled, prospective study of 32 women. The treatment protocol included a series of treatments, performed twice a week for 6 weeks. Each treatment consisted of 500 pulses of low intensity shockwaves (0.09 mJ/〖mm〗\^2 ) using the "Medispec ED-1000®" shock wave generator or sham.

The study was a single center, double-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled, prospective study. Study eligibility criteria were treatment at the Neuro-urology Unit in Rambam Medical Center, during January 2018 - January 2020 and a diagnosis of PVD. PVD diagnosis was based on description of the pain and on a positive cotton swab test15. Women were randomized at a 2:1 ratio to treatment or sham groups. The treatment protocol included a series of treatments, performed twice a week for 6 weeks, for a total of 12 sessions. Each treatment consisted of 500 pulses of low intensity shockwaves (0.09 millijoul/〖mm〗\^2 ) using the "Medispec ED-1000®" shock wave generator. The sham protocol included the same treatment protocol without shock wave generator activation. The patients were evaluated three times throughout the trial by an investigator blinded to the group allocation: before the first treatment, and one and three months after the twelfth treatment. Pain was assessed by both subjective and objective measures. The primary outcome measure was a change in dyspareunia, as assessed by scores on the 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS) (range 0-10 ). Secondary outcome measures for evaluating pain were increases in pain threshold and tolerance, assessed by a quantitative validated algometer test16, 17, the Wong-Baker pain FACES scale (range 0-10)18, the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) (range 2-38)19 and the Patients' Global Impression of Change scale (PGIC) (first component range 0-7; 0=no change, 7=a great deal better; second component range 0-10; 0=much better and 10=much worse)20. The PGIC assessed the self-reported impression of a general change due to the intervention. The algometer applied was a very basic and simple device that was assembled and used at our unit after validating its safety, accuracy, and adequacy in evaluating introitus pain vs control (doctorate dissertation). For assessing the pain threshold with the algometer, radial pressure (mmHg) was applied by progressively inflating a cylindrical balloon inserted in the introitus. The participant was required to report the first painful sensation, and this pressure, defined as the threshold pressure, was registered. The measurement was performed sequentially 4 times and the average of the measured pressures was considered the first pain threshold). Finally, for pain tolerance measurement, the participant was again asked to report when she had reached her pain limit (1-10 on the verbal scale ) upon continuous pressure