This study evaluates the addition of Acalabrutinib to current standard therapy of Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine and Prednisolone (R-CHOP) for patients with previously untreated CD20 positive Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) requiring full course chemoimmunotherapy. All patients will receive one cycle of R-CHOP. Two thirds of patients (Arm B) will go on to receive a further 5 cycles (every 21 days) of R-CHOP with Acalabrutinib. Acalabrutinib will be taken orally twice daily continuously in 21 day cycles. One third of patients (Arm A) will continue with 5 cycles of R-CHOP. Patients will be followed up initially for 24 months and then for disease status and survival until 114 progression events have been observed.
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common of the non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Whilst the majority of patients will respond well to conventional treatment (R-CHOP - rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone), a significant number of patients lymphoma will not respond to initial therapy or their disease will return after completion of therapy. In a number of B-cell diseases an enzyme called, Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) prevents death of tumour cells, including in DLBCL. Acalabrutinib is an orally active BTK-inhibitor and it is thought that stopping BTK being activated may help in treating B-cell diseases. It is hypothesised that the addition of Acalabrutinib to standard R-CHOP immunochemotherapy may improve outcomes of patients with DLBCL. REMoDL-A is a randomised, phase II, open label, multicentre study that will be open in up to 50 centres. Up to 553 patients (453 randomised) will be recruited. Following informed consent all patients will receive 1 cycle of conventional R-CHOP chemotherapy. At the same time the diagnostic pathology block will be sent for molecular profiling by the Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service (HMDS). The delivery of the first cycle of R-CHOP will allow a sufficient interval for real time determination of molecular phenotype. Patients whose biopsies yield sufficient tumour material for profiling will be randomised 2:1 in favour of the experimental arm (R-CHOP + acalabrutinib). The primary objective will be to establish if combining acalabrutinib with R-CHOP improves efficacy, compared to R-CHOP alone, for the treatment of previously untreated patients with DLBCL to a degree that justifies further development of this approach.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
453
Arm A patients will receive R-CHOP alone.
Arm B patients will receive R-CHOP in combination with acalabrutinib.
Colchester General Hospital
Colchester, Essex, United Kingdom
East Kent Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Canterbury, Kent, United Kingdom
Monklands Hospital
Airdrie, United Kingdom
Victoria Hospital
Blackpool, United Kingdom
University Hospital Dorset NHS Foundation Trust (Bournemouth and Poole Hospitals)
Bournemouth, United Kingdom
To establish if combining acalabrutinib with R-CHOP improves efficacy, compared to RCHOP alone, for the treatment of previously untreated patients with DLBCL to a degree that justifies further development of this approach.
Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as time from registration to progression/death from any cause.
Time frame: Last patient's last follow up, approximately 4.5 years. Patients who do not experience a PFS event will be censored at the date of last follow up.
To compare PFS between molecular groups.
PFS interaction with cell of origin phenotype (ABC, GCB and unclassifiable).
Time frame: Last patient's last follow-up, approximately 4.5 years.
To compare PFS between treatment groups.
PFS interaction with clinical variables, including for example IPI, bulk, components of IPI, age and others to be determined in the SAP.
Time frame: Last patient's last follow-up, approximately 4.5 years.
To compare overall survival (OS) between both treatment and molecular groups.
Overall survival (OS), defined as time from registration to death from any cause.
Time frame: Last patient's last follow-up, approximately 4.5 years. Patients who do not experience an OS event will be censored at the date of last follow-up.
To compare event free survival (EFS) between both treatment and molecular groups.
Event-free survival (EFS), or time to treatment failure, defined as time from registration to any treatment failure including disease progression, or discontinuation of treatment for any reason.
Time frame: Last patient's last follow-up, approximately 4.5 years. Patients who do not experience an EFS event will be censored at the date of last follow-up.
To compare disease free survival (DFS) between both treatment and molecular groups.
Disease-free survival (DFS), defined as time of documentation of disease-free state to disease recurrence or death as a result of lymphoma or acute toxicity of treatment.
Time frame: Last patient's last follow-up, approximately 4.5 years. Patients who do not experience a DFS event will be censored at the date of last follow-up.
To compare time to progression (TTP) between both treatment and molecular groups.
Time to progression (TTP), defined as time from registration until documented lymphoma progression or death as a result of lymphoma. Deaths from other causes are censored at the time of death.
Time frame: Last patient's last follow-up, approximately 4.5 years. Patients who do not experience a TTP event will be censored at the date of last follow-up.
To compare duration of response (DoR) between both treatment and molecular groups.
Response duration (DoR), defined as the time from documentation of response until the documentation of relapse or progression.
Time frame: Last patient's last follow-up, approximately 4.5 years. Patients who do not experience a RD event will be censored at the date of last follow-up.
To compare overall response rate (ORR) and complete response rate (CR) between both treatment groups.
Assessment using the Lugano Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma.
Time frame: Complete and overall response rates, as recorded at the end of treatment (up to 21 weeks) .
To assess differences in toxicity between assigned treatments.
Evaluation of toxicity according to CTCAE version 5.
Time frame: At all visits up to 24 months follow-up.
To assess differences in quality of life between treatment arms.
Application of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-Lym questionnaires.
Time frame: At baseline, cycle 2 day 1, cycle 3 day 1, cycle 5 day 1, end of treatment and at 3, 6, 12, 20 and 24 month follow-ups. Each cycle is 21 days.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Queens Hospital
Burton-on-Trent, United Kingdom
Addenbrooke's Hospital
Cambridge, United Kingdom
Royal Derby Hospital
Derby, United Kingdom
Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital
Exeter, United Kingdom
Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre
Glasgow, United Kingdom
...and 23 more locations