This study aims to determine if a strategy of recommending prone (on stomach) positioning of patients positive or suspected positive for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requiring supplemental oxygen, but not mechanically ventilated, Is feasible in the inpatient setting. This study will be performed as a pragmatic pilot clinical trial to gain information relevant to the future conduct of a larger trial.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2, SARS-CoV-2, the virus causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, has rapidly led to significant morbidity and mortality worldwide, primarily through lower respiratory tract involvement progressing from hypoxemia to acute respiratory distress syndrome. Novel approaches to improving oxygenation are urgently needed to limit aerosolization concerns and resource scarcity associated with intubation and, to a lesser extent, other forms of advanced respiratory support. Prone positioning in mechanically ventilated patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure has been associated with improvement in oxygenation and mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The prone position appears to provide more uniform lung perfusion, shifting ventilation to well-perfused lung segments and recruitment of dependent atelectatic regions of lung. Physiological alterations associated with the prone position would foreseeably also apply to spontaneously breathing patients and evidence from small observational studies suggests that prone positioning in non-intubated patients is feasible associated with improvement in oxygenation. However, it remains unknown if a prone ventilation strategy is truly beneficial for non-intubated hypoxic Covid-19 patients, and this question has stimulated interest in the conduct of rigorous randomized controlled trials (RCT). However, the awake prone strategy is a complex medical intervention with multiple implementation nuances such as adoption, feasibility, and tolerability that may affect successful conduct of a definitive RCT. In order to increase the likelihood of a successful future RCT, the investigators will conduct the APPS pilot study. The overall aim of the APPS pilot trial was to assess feasibility and important contextual factors for a large RCT to compare the clinical effectiveness of an Awake-Prone Positioning Strategy (APPS) for respiratory support versus usual care alone for hypoxic adults with Covid-19.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
40
No clinical team recommendation, patients will remain in their natural choice of position
Clinical team guidance on prone positioning of patients
Carolinas Medical Center
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Average S/F ratio
Average oxygen saturation to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio
Time frame: 48 hours from eligibility
Time spent with S/F ratio < 315
Time spent with oxygenation saturation to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio less than 315
Time frame: 48 hours from eligibility
Highest oxygen support
Highest level of supplemental oxygen required
Time frame: 48 hours from eligibility
Number of patients requiring ICU admission during study period
Number of patients requiring ICU admission during study period
Time frame: 48 hours from eligibility
Number of patients requiring ICU admission during hospitalization
Number of patients requiring ICU admission during hospitalization
Time frame: through study completion, Up to 30 days
Number of patients experiencing who die prior to discharge
Number of patients who die prior to hospital discharge
Time frame: through study completion, Up to 30 days
Number of patients requiring intubation
Number of patients requiring intubation
Time frame: 48 hours From eligibility
Hospital length of stay
Number of days from hospital admission to discharge
Time frame: through study completion, Up to 30 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.