The challenge to achieve adequate analgesia has led to the development of directed, multi-modal protocols specific to management of post-laparoscopy pain in effort to decrease the amount of additional administration of narcotic medication. While several non-opioid regiments have been found to be effective, opioid medications still play a significant role in early postoperative analgesia. Given the adverse side effects of narcotic medications, regional blocks utilizing local anesthetic agents and has been shown to improve overall pain control in this time period. Truncal abdominal nerve blocks are useful for pain control in abdominal and pelvic surgeries. More recently, the utilization of the quadratus lumborum (QL) block has effectively alleviated somatic and visceral pain in the upper and lower abdomen. The QL block provides analgesia spanning from the T4 to L1 dermatomal levels in the thoracolumbar plane to provide a broad sensory level analgesic effect. The approach involves injecting local anesthetic under ultrasound guidance into the plane posterior to the quadratus lumborum muscle and middle layer of thoracolumbar fascia. Given the utility of the QL block in controlling somatic pain, this study aims to determine whether the QL block is an effective analgesic adjunct in the control of postoperative pain period, specifically with regards to patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery.
Prospective Cohort observational study. All patients that meet criteria for participation in this study will be screened: patients scheduled to undergo a laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign conditions by attending physicians in the division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery. Based on surgeon's preference, and patient's consent, the patient is offered a QL block or not. Our aim is to follow the patient's pain scores post op and amount of oral pain medication used whether they received QL block or not. If the patient received the QL block then they will be considered part of the study arm. If the patient did not receive the QL block then they will be considered part of the control arm. The QL block is best thought of as a volume or compartment block in that volumetric spread of LA along the fascial plane is associated with efficacy in blocking the thoracolumbar nerves between T7-L1. It can be reasonably assumed that this compartment is the same across patients and is not affected by the amount of subcutaneous or central fat present in the obese patient. If a block is to be performed, the QL block will be performed using a 21G x 100mm Stimuplex needle under ultrasound guidance using a curvilinear probe. Subjects will be positioned in the semi-lateral position to facilitate access into the plane posterior to the quadratus lumborum muscle and middle layer of thoracolumbar fascia. The QL block will be administered via an in-plane approach and local anesthetic will be injected between the quadratus lumborum muscle and the middle layer of the thoracolumbar. The QL block will be in the operating room after induction prior to starting the scheduled surgical procedure. If the block is performed, it will include 20ml of 0.25% bupivacaine and 5ml of liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel) per side. The block will be done bilaterally therefore a total of 40ml of 0.25% bupivacaine and 10ml of liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel) will be administered.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
50
Fo the QL block group, they will be receiving bilateral QL block. A total of 40ml of 0.25% bupivacaine (Marcaine) and 10ml of liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel) will be administered
Maimonides Medical Center
Brooklyn, New York, United States
Difference in pain score
Our primary outcome is difference in pain scores at 3 hours between the two groups. The pain score will be assessed using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) from 0-10 with 0 as no pain and 10 as worst possible pain
Time frame: 3 hours postoperative
Difference in pain score
Our secondary outcome is difference in pain scores at 1 hour between the two groups. The pain score will be assessed using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) from 0-10 with 0 as no pain and 10 as worst possible pain
Time frame: 1 hour postoperative
Difference in pain score
Our secondary outcome is difference in pain scores at 24 hour between the two groups. The pain score will be assessed using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) from 0-10 with 0 as no pain and 10 as worst possible pain
Time frame: 24 hours postoperative
Difference in amount of pain killers used
Our secondary outcome is difference in the amount of pain killers used during the 24 hour period post operatively
Time frame: pain killers used during the 24 hours postoperatively. The patient will be provided an empty sheet to record everytime a pain killer is used including the type and dose of pain killer . The pain killers are prescribed at the surgeon's discretion
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.