FITSTART (Feedback Intervention Targeting Student Transitions and Risk Trajectories) is a parent-based social norms intervention that has been shown to reduce risky drinking in incoming first year students.This program uses normative feedback to correct parents overestimation of other parents negative alcohol-related parenting practices (e.g., number of drinks parents would permit their college student to consume). Theory and research suggests that correcting those common misperceptions can motivate parents to adjust their own behaviors (e.g., reducing the number of drinks they would permit), which, in turn, can impact college student drinking. Despite FITSTARTs success, the design of the program limits participation to only students who have parents who can attend on-campus orientation sessions during the summer months before the start of the Fall semester. To address this limitation and extend the previous work, the proposed randomized clinical trial (RCT) will evaluate the efficacy of an online adaptation of the FITSTART(+) PBI program. To examine the efficacy of the newly developed FITSTART+ PBI web app, the proposed RCT will use a longitudinal design to examine if students self-report drinking and related negative consequences during their first semester in college significantly differed between FITSTART+ PBI (intervention app) and a control version of the app. Self-reported drinking and consequences are expected to be lower amongst students with parents randomized to FITSTART+ PBI relative to those with parents randomized to the control app.
Heavy episodic drinking (HED) rates remains at unacceptably high levels on college campuses. Researchers on parent-based interventions (PBIs) has revealed promising results. but studies have generally failed to reduce HED in college students. FITSTART was developed to address two limitations of traditional PBIs that may contribute to the lack of the aforementioned effects: (I) they are purely informational and (II) they typically lack a motivational component to capture parents' attention and increase motivation to proactively engage their students. Pilot work has revealed that parents display predictable normative misperceptions (e.g., overestimate how approving other parents are of drinking and underestimate how often other parents engage with their students about drinking). As predicted by social norms theory, these false beliefs are associated with parents displaying more approving attitudes themselves and communicating less frequently. Correcting these norms should motivate parents to proactively engage their child in risk-reducing directions. FITSTART combined a social norms feedback component with informational material ("tips") characteristic of a traditional PBI in an in-person interactive format and successfully reduced HED. While the effects on weekly drinking, HED, and non-drinker alcohol use initiation were robust 1-month into college (3-months post intervention). FITSTART's usefulness as a universal approach is limited because it was delivered to parent groups on-campus during pre-college orientation sessions and many colleges do not hold summer orientations and/or lack the resources to administer FITSTART. To address this limitation, a web-based platform (or app) was developed using a new cutting-edge modality that draws from the computer science literature on virtual co-presence to create an online environment that mimics the effects of a live group social norms session. The current pilot study seeks to evaluate the efficacy of the FITSTART+ PBI in a randomized control trial (RCT) by evaluating changes in incoming first-year students' alcohol use and related negative consequences during the transition into college. The sample will consist of traditional first year students (17-20 years of age) from Loyola Marymount University who completed consent and the baseline survey, and whose parents downloaded and registered for the FITSTART+ intervention or control app. Parents will be invited to download the intervention/control app two weeks prior to their student's arrival on campus in the fall (beginning of August). To examine the short- and long-term effects of the intervention, students will complete a baseline survey at the end of July (pre- matriculation) and two follow-up surveys, approximately 1 month (October) and 6 months (April) after the students arrive on campus in the spring.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
266
Personalized normative feedback on other parents behaviors + alcohol-specific parenting advice + general parenting advice
General parenting advice
Loyola Marymount
Los Angeles, California, United States
Change From Baseline Typical Weekly Drinking at 1 Month
At baseline and the 1-month follow-up, participants reported the typical quantity of standard alcohol drinks consumed on each day of the week during the past 30 days using the Daily Drinking Questionnaire. Quantity of drinks reported on each day of the week at baseline and 1-month were then summed (separately) to create a composite variable assessing typical weekly drinking at each time point. To compute the outcome, the 1-month measure of typical drinks per week was subtracted from the baseline measure of typical drinks per week such that a positive value indicates a decrease in consumption during this period and a negative value indicates an increase in consumption during this period.
Time frame: baseline, 1 month
Change From Baseline Typical Weekly Drinking at 6 Months
At baseline and the 6-month follow-up, participants reported the typical quantity of standard alcohol drinks consumed on each day of the week during the past 30 days using the Daily Drinking Questionnaire. Quantity of drinks reported on each day of the week at baseline and 1-month were then summed (separately) to create a composite variable assessing typical weekly drinking at each time point. To compute the outcome, the 6-month measure of typical drinks per week was subtracted from the baseline measure of typical drinks per week such that a positive value indicates a decrease in consumption during this period and a negative value indicates an increase in consumption during this period.
Time frame: baseline, 6 months
Change From Baseline Frequency of Alcohol Consequences at 1 Month
At baseline and the 1-month follow-up, the number of types of negative alcohol-related consequences experienced out of a list of 14 common negative alcohol-related consequences (past 30 days) were summed to create a composite variable at each time point. To compute the outcome, the 1-month measure of negative consequences was subtracted from the baseline measure of negative consequences such that a positive value indicates a decrease in consequences during this period and a negative value indicates an increase in consequences during this period.
Time frame: baseline, 1 month
Change From Baseline Frequency of Alcohol Consequences at 6 Months
At baseline and the 6-month follow-up, the number of types of negative alcohol-related consequences experienced out of a list of 14 common negative alcohol-related consequences (past 30 days) were summed to create a composite variable at each time point. To compute the outcome, the 6-month measure of negative consequences was subtracted from the baseline measure of negative consequences such that a positive value indicates a decrease in consequences during this period and a negative value indicates an increase in consequences during this period.
Time frame: baseline, 6 months
Change From Baseline Quantity/Frequency/Peak Alcohol Use at 1 Month
At baseline and the 1-month follow-up, an item assessing the number of maximum drinks on one occasion from the Frequency, Quantity, Max (FQM) measure was used to assess peak drinks on one occasion over the past 30 days. To compute the outcome, the 1-month measure of peak drinks was subtracted from the baseline measure of peak drinks such that a positive value indicates a decrease in consumption during this period and a negative value indicates an increase in consumption during this period.
Time frame: baseline, 1 month
Change From Baseline Quantity/Frequency/Peak Alcohol Use at 6 Months
At baseline and the 6-month follow-up, an item assessing the number of maximum drinks on one occasion from the Frequency, Quantity, Max (FQM) measure was used to assess peak drinks on one occasion over the past 30 days. To compute the outcome, the 6-month measure of peak drinks was subtracted from the baseline measure of peak drinks such that a positive value indicates a decrease in consumption during this period and a negative value indicates an increase in consumption during this period.
Time frame: baseline, 6 months
Change From Baseline Heavy Episodic Drinking at 1 Month
At baseline and the 1-month follow-up, an item assessing the number of times students reported a heavy episodic drinking (HED) event in the past two weeks. To compute the outcome, the 1-month measure of HED was subtracted from the baseline measure of HED such that a positive value indicates a decrease in HED events during this period and a negative value indicates an increase in HED events during this period.
Time frame: baseline, 1 month
Change From Baseline Heavy Episodic Drinking at 6 Months
At baseline and the 1-month follow-up, an item assessing the number of times students reported a heavy episodic drinking (HED) event in the past two weeks. To compute the outcome, the 1-month measure of HED was subtracted from the baseline measure of HED such that a positive value indicates a decrease in HED events during this period and a negative value indicates an increase in HED events during this period.
Time frame: baseline, 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.