a prospective, single center, observational clinical trail. Aim to to compare the efficacy and safety of the Bioabsorbable scaffold (BRS) Neovas BRS and Drug-coating balloon (DCB) in the treatment of STEMI patients with coronary artery disease and to further evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the two new interventional methods in STEMI intervention, so as to better guide clinical practice.
1. To study the advantages and disadvantages of Neovas BRS and DCB in interventional treatment of de novo lesions in STEMI patients, in order to better guide the clinical. 2. To explore the safety of Neovas BRS in interventional treatment of ide novo lesions in STEMI patients. 3. To explore the safety of DCB in interventional treatment of de novo lesions in STEMI patients.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
40
All STEMI patients were predilated (including predilated balloon or cutting balloon) before randomization. Thrombus aspiration was determined by the surgeon according to the specific situation. Sufficient predilation criteria: the following two conditions must be met: A. residual stenosis \< 30%; B. no flow limiting dissection or TIMI grade 2-3.
Shenzhen People's Hospital
Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
RECRUITINGlate lumen loss (LLL)
The primary endpoint in-segment is late lumen loss (LLL) with follow-up of 1 year.
Time frame: 1-year
target lesion revascularization (TLR)
The secondary endpoint is target lesion revascularization (TLR) with follow-up of 1 year.
Time frame: 1-year
cardiac death
The secondary endpoint is cardiac death with follow-up of 1 year.
Time frame: 1-year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.