This phase III trial compares minimally invasive surgery (MIS) to laparotomy in treating patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer who are receiving chemotherapy before and after surgery (neoadjuvant chemotherapy). MIS is a surgical procedure that uses small incision(s) and is intended to produce minimal blood loss and pain for the patient. Laparotomy is a surgical procedure which allows the doctors to remove some or all of the tumor and check if the disease has spread to other organs in the body. MIS may work the same or better than standard laparotomy after chemotherapy in prolonging the return of the disease and/or improving quality of life after surgery.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To examine whether MIS is non-inferior to laparotomy in terms of disease free survival (DFS) in women with advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) that received 3 to 4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine if there are differences in health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) in patients undergoing MIS versus (vs) laparotomy as assessed with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30), QLQ-Ovarian Cancer Module (OV28), and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G7). II. To determine if there are differences between patients undergoing MIS vs laparotomy in the rate of optimal cytoreduction (defined as residual tumor nodules each measuring 1 cm or less in maximum diameter) and complete cytoreduction (defined as no evidence of macroscopic disease). III. To examine whether MIS is non-inferior to laparotomy in terms of overall survival (OS) in women with advanced stage EOC that received 3 to 4 cycles of NACT. IV. To determine if there are differences between patients undergoing MIS vs laparotomy in surgical morbidity and mortality, intraoperative injuries, and post-operative complications. V. To determine the rates of MIS converted to laparotomy and the reasons. VI. To determine if there are any difference in costs and cost-effectiveness between patients undergoing MIS vs laparotomy. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM A: Patients undergo MIS within 6 weeks after last cycle of standard of care neoadjuvant chemotherapy. If during MIS the surgeon thinks complete gross resection can only be accomplished by performing an open procedure, patients may undergo laparotomy instead. Within 6 weeks after surgery, patients receive standard of care chemotherapy. ARM B: Patients undergo laparotomy within 6 weeks after last cycle of standard of care neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Within 6 weeks after surgery, patients receive standard of care chemotherapy. After completion of study, patients are followed up within 6 weeks of completing post-surgery chemotherapy, then every 3 months for the first 2 years, and then every 6 months for 3 years.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
580
Receive standard of care chemotherapy
Undergo laparotomy
Undergo MIS
Ancillary studies
Ancillary studies
University of Miami Miller School of Medicine-Sylvester Cancer Center
Miami, Florida, United States
RECRUITINGCleveland Clinic Foundation - Florida
Weston, Florida, United States
RECRUITINGMassachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
RECRUITINGDana Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
RECRUITINGNYU Langone Health
Mineola, New York, United States
RECRUITINGColumbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
RECRUITINGDuke
Durham, North Carolina, United States
RECRUITINGCleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
RECRUITINGSt. Luke's University Health Network
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States
RECRUITINGLyndon Baines Johnson General
Houston, Texas, United States
RECRUITING...and 9 more locations
Disease free survival (DFS)
Kaplan Meier curves will be used to describe DFS over time. Log-rank test will be used to compare DFS between the control and experimental arms. The treatment effects will be summarized by means of a hazard ratio with its associated 95% confidence interval. Two years DFS rate will be computed with a targeted 95% confidence interval (CI).
Time frame: Between randomization and physical or radiographic evidence of recurrence (local/distant) or death (all causes), assessed up to 5 years
Health related-quality of life (HR-QoL)
HR-QoL of patients will be assessed with European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC Scale 1-Not at all, 2-A little bit, 3-Quite a bit, 4-Very Much)
Time frame: Up to 1 year post surgery chemotherapy
Health related-quality of life (HR-QoL)
HR-QoL of patients will be assessed Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQC30 scale 1-Not at all, 2-A little bit, 3-Quite a bit, 4-Very Much)
Time frame: Up to 1 year post surgery chemotherapy
Health related-quality of life (HR-QoL)
HR-QoL of patients will be assessed with QLQ-Ovarian Cancer Module (OV28 Scale 1- Not at all, 2- A little bit, 3-Quite a bit, 4-Very Much).) (ovarian supplement)
Time frame: Up to 1 year post surgery chemotherapy
Health related-quality of life (HR-QoL)
HR-QoL of patients will be assessed with Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General short-form (FACT-G7 Scale 1- Not at all, 2- A little bit, 3-Quite a bit, 4-Very Much).
Time frame: Up to 1 year post surgery chemotherapy
Optimal cytoreduction
Defined as residual tumor nodules each measuring 1 cm or less in maximum diameter.
Time frame: At the end of surgery
Complete cytoreduction
Defined as no evidence of macroscopic disease.
Time frame: At the end of surgery
Overall survival (OS)
Overall survival will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and will be described using the median with its 95% CI. Univariate Cox proportional hazards model (i.e., logrank test) will be used to estimate hazard ratios (HR: control arm versus investigational arm) with a 95% CI. When appropriate, multivariate Cox analyses will be performed, in which a univariate selection procedure will serve to identify eligible explanatory variables with univariate Cox (using Wald test) p-value lower than 0.10 as potential prognostic value. Follow-up will be estimated using the reverse Kaplan-Meier method, and will be described using the median with its 95% CI.
Time frame: Between randomization and death (all causes), assessed up to 5 years
Surgical morbidity
Rates of surgical complications according to Surgical morbidity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events \[CTCAE\] version \[v\] 5.0 \& Clavien Dindo classification and mortality (30-day post-operative for adverse events and up to 6 months post-operative for adverse events of interest).
Time frame: Up to 6 months post surgery
Mortality
Mortality rates (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events \[CTCAE\] version \[v\] 5.0 \& Clavien Dindo classification and mortality (30-day post-operative for adverse events and up to 6 months post-operative for adverse events of interest).
Time frame: Up to 6 months post surgery
Intraoperative injuries
Coded as yes or no and categorized as involving the bowel, veins, arteries, ureter, bladder, or other site.
Time frame: During surgery
Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) converted to laparotomy
Prospectively completed forms documented reasons for conversion of MIS to laparotomy.
Time frame: During surgery
Cost of the procedure
A cost analysis may be performed in some countries.
Time frame: Up to 6 months post surgery
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.