PEMF Therapy to Treat Lingering Symptoms of Lyme Disease After Treatment With Antibiotics

Overview

Overview PEMF Therapy for relief or reduction of lingering symptoms after antibiotic treatment of Lyme disease of participants in the UK. Symptoms monitored: Muscle ache, myalgia, muscle pain that is acutely located and/or 'wandering' (different location on different days) Aching joints Headache Fatigue, general tiredness, loss of energy, general exhaustion Mild, recurrent fever and/or chills occurring regularly Lack of oxygen in blood, feelings of 'air hunger', too high carbon dioxide levels in blood

Hypothesis Period measured and observed: 18 months (Includes before treatment, during the 4-8 weeks of treatment and post treatment) Control Group Control Group symptoms will remain the same or increase (deteriorate or worsen) by 10-20% over the period observed. The Control Group is not asked to nor required to abstain from any other forms of treatment during the 10 month observational period; Persons in the Control Group are free to - but not encouraged to - pursue holistic, complementary and mainstream medicine for their symptoms related to contraction of Lyme Disease and any other illness that may arise. In the event of receiving treatment or taking medicine, this information is to be passed along for data collection in the regular surveys. This will be taken into consideration when evaluating the results of the trial and hypothesis. Test Group Test Group symptoms will improve (be reduced or eliminated) by 50-75% over the period observed; In particular, the largest improvement will be achieved during the 8 weeks of treatment. After treatment, there may be a slight improvement of symptoms, however, the improvement achieved during treatment is expected to remain the same over the next 7.5 months following treatment with the exception of re-infection or contraction of a different disease or illness. The Test Group is not asked to nor required to abstain from any other forms of treatment during the 10 month observational period; Persons in the Control Group are free to - but not encouraged to - pursue holistic, complementary and mainstream medicine for their symptoms related to contraction of Lyme Disease and any other illness that may arise. In the event of receiving treatment or taking medicine, this information is to be passed along for data collection in the regular surveys. This will be taken into consideration when evaluating the results of the trial and hypothesis. Measurement (What the Investigator is Measuring and Observing in Response to Testing) and Weighting Measurement: 1 to 100 Scale Worsening/decline or improvement/reduction of symptoms will be measured by the information collected in the surveys. Answers to questions are given subjectively by the participants themselves on a scale of 1 to 100, with 1 being the worst possible or imaginable and 100 being the best possible or imaginable. For example, the worst imaginable answer of "1" to the question of mobility/movement would be in the event that the participant is in a wheelchair or coma. Being confined to a wheelchair is certainly more mobile than lying in a comatose state, however, the answers to each question are subjective and so the participant might believe that a wheelchair would be the worst measure of mobility for him or her. Weighting of Answers To weight the improvement or decline respectively for each participant, the average of the first three and last three surveys will be taken. This is to rule out any possible statistical outliers or anomalies due to the participant possibly having a 'bad day' or coincidental other illness such as a head cold. Example Question: Rate overall energy level on a scale of 1 to 100, where 1 is the lowest imaginable and 100 is the best, pre-Lyme Disease level possible. Example Answers: Participant A First survey: 45 Second survey: 40 Third survey: 48 25th survey (third to last): 80 26th survey (second to last): 83 27th survey (last or final): 80 Weighting here would be calculated in the following way: Starting point or "zero point" is the average of the first three surveys * ( 45 + 40 + 48 ) / 3 = 44.33 Ending point is the average of the last three surveys * ( 80 + 83 + 80 ) / 3 = 81 An improvement of 100% for this participant would be from 44.33 at the starting point up to 100 at the ending point, what is to be considered a full recovery or full elimination of symptoms. The breadth of full recovery therefore contains a different amount of scala numbers for each participant, because a full recovery is based individually on each participant. This is to avoid an increase or decrease of more than 100%. Using this example: No improvement would be from 44.33 to \[44-44.49\], an increase of approximately 0 = 0% Full recovery would be from 44.33 to 100, an increase of 55.67 = 100% Amount of improvement in the example is from 44.33 to 81, an increase of 36.67; It is then calculated 36.67 / 55.67 = 68.9% Participant B (Example Answers) First survey: 30 Second survey: 25 Third survey: 25 25th survey (third to last): 80 26th survey (second to last): 83 27th survey (last or final): 80 Weighting here would be calculated in the following way: Starting point or "zero point" is the average of the first three surveys * ( 30 + 25 + 25 ) / 3 = 26.67 Ending point is the average of the last three surveys * ( 80 + 83 + 80 ) / 3 = 81 An improvement of 100% for this participant would be from 26.67 at the starting point up to 100 at the ending point, what is to be considered a full recovery or full elimination of symptoms. Using this example: No improvement would be from 26.67 to \[26.5-27\], an increase of approximately 0 = 0% Full recovery would be from 26.67 to 100, an increase of 73.33 = 100% Amount of improvement in the example is from 26.67 to 81, an increase of 54.33; It is then calculated 54.33 / 73.33 = 74.1% More information can be found published on the investigator's website: https://biofeedbackcentrebristol.co.uk/lyme-disease-clinical-trial/