The objective of the study is thus to compare the effects 5 consecutive sessions of anodal and cathodal tDCS combined with conventional physical therapy on upper and lower limb motor performance in acute stroke at immediate, and 1-month followup.
Stroke is a major cause of long-term disability in stroke survivors that related with motor impairment. After stroke, the cortical excitability of ipsilesional hemisphere is decreased; in contrast, the cortical excitability of contralesional hemisphere is increased. Conventional physical therapy is beneficial to motor recovery, but early rehabilitation was not always help the patients get full recovery. tDCS is an adjuvant tools which deliver weak direct current through scalp to promote motor recovery in stroke rehabilitation. The anodal-tDCS increases cortical excitability, while the cathodal-tDCS decreases cortical excitability. Previous studies demonstrated that both monocephalic techniques of tDCS can improve motor function in chronic, subacute, and acute phase, but it is still inconclusive that which monocephalic montages had better effect, especially in acute phase. There are several studies supported the benefits of monocephalic tDCS combined with rehabilitation programs on upper and lower limbs motor function in acute stroke. However, there is no evidence that directly compared the effect of monocephalic tDCS in acute stroke patients. The objective of the study is to compare the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS combined with conventional physical therapy for 5 sessions on motor performance in acute stroke at immediate, and 1-month follow-up.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
36
Cathodal/Anodal tDCS will be applied in 1.5 mA, 20 mins before conventional physical therapy for 5 days. All experiments will be performed in random order for each subject.
Faculty ofPhysical Therapy, Mahidol University
Salaya, Nakonpathom, Thailand
Fugl-Meyer Assessment
gold standard and widely used tool to assess sensorimotor in stroke. The item from upper limb and lower limb section will be used. The items are rated on a 3-point ordinal scale as follows: 0 = unable to perform; 1 = partial ability to perform; and 2 = near normal ability to perform.
Time frame: 20 minutes
Wolf Motor Function Test
The participants will be asked to perform 2 items that consist of reaching a can and reaching a pen because two tasks is the most common reaching task of hand functions in daily living activities.
Time frame: 5 minutes
Five Times Sit to Stand Test
Subjects will sits on the chair and place their back against the chair. Timing will begin at "GO", the subjects will be asked to walk 3m, turn, walk back, and sit down. The stopwatch stops when the patient's buttocks touch the seat.
Time frame: 5 minutes
Time-up and go test
The TUG test is a commonly used screening tool to measure basic mobility correlating to dynamic balance. Start from sitting, stand up, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back 3 meters and sit down. Timed to complete the task represent the body transfer and gait performance
Time frame: 5 minutes
Muscle strength
The strength of UE (shoulder flexor, shoulder extensor, elbow extensor, wrist extensor) and LE (hip extensor, hip flexor, knee extensor and ankle dorsiflexor) will be assessed by hand-held dynamometer
Time frame: 10 minutes
Hemodynamic response (VMR%)
cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV), cerebral vasomotor reactivity (VMR) that is the capability of cerebral small vessels to respond to a stimulus
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 15 minutes