Lymphoedema is a chronic debilitating disease that can have severe adverse effects on day-to-day life causing great physical and visual discomfort. The clinical presentation is characterised by chronic swelling of limbs, accompanied by localised pain, skin changes and recurrent infections. It is caused by a disruption in lymphatic flow which prevents the normal circulation of interstitial fluid (situated in the spaces between the cells of the body), resulting in swelling of the affected limb. It can be primary (cause unknown) or secondary to a number of causes such as malignancy, trauma, surgery, radiotherapy, infection, or venous disease. In breast cancer treatment, axillary surgery and radiotherapy significantly damage normal lymphatic drainage of the upper limb, causing lymphoedema in 1-in-5 patients. There is a growing body of evidence that this chronic and debilitating condition can be better managed through early surgical intervention rather than the current conservative management, which rely on pressure garments and massage. This surgical intervention, lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA), joins up a number of the draining lymphatic vessels to correspondingly sized veins on the affected limb using microsurgical techniques. A special dye and camera system is used to facilitate identifying lymph vessels. This creates a new drainage pathway for the lymph fluid around the area of disruption, improving lymphatic flow. Volume reduction is expected and this would be expected to provide quality of life benefits for the patients. This study seeks to compare the outcomes from both therapies and determine whether LVA surgery can help to improve the physical burden and quality of life for patients affected by lymphoedema. Furthermore, lymphoedema places a substantial burden on NHS services. If this trial is successful, LVA surgery could improve patient outcomes and reduce the overall cost of treatment.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
64
Lymphoedema is well recognized as a chronic debilitating disease resulting from an abnormal collection of protein-rich fluid within the subcutaneous tissues of the body. Given the need to identify more effective treatments, more recent advances in super microsurgical techniques have seen the introduction of new procedures, perhaps the most successful of which have involved re-routing the lymphatic fluid by using microsurgery to divert small lymphatic channels into venules in the sub-dermal plane (LVA surgery). This procedure is performed under regional or general anaesthetic as a day-case operation, leaving only a few very short scars in the skin of the arm or leg.
Mark Brandon-Grove
Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom
RECRUITINGMark Brandon-Grove
London, United Kingdom
RECRUITINGMean excess volume reduction - compared between two cohorts
Primary outcome measure is to evaluate the efficacy of LVA surgery (combined with CGT) by comparison of arm volume measurements across both the surgical and the control group at set time points post-surgery). This will be performed using the mean excess volume reduction (EVR) as a percentage change at 12 months - measured with perometry.
Time frame: 12 months from recruitment
Safety - infection and surgical complications
Assess the safety of LVA surgery (supported by PDE imaging guidance) by recording incidence of infection and post-operative complications.
Time frame: 12 months from recruitment
Bio-impedance spectroscopy
Compare changes in bio-impedance spectroscopy during the period of the study
Time frame: 12 months from recruitment
Cellulitis
Compare the incidence of cellulitis in both groups within the 12-month study period
Time frame: 12 months from recruitment
Quality of life - LYMQOL score
Compare longer term Quality of Life (QOL) in both groups using a quality of life assessment tool for lymphoedema of the limbs (LYMQOL) completed by patients. Multiple questions covering function, appearance, symptoms and mood are asked, with a quality of life score for each between 1 and 4. Total score 16 (higher score = poorer quality of life)
Time frame: 12 months from recruitment
Compliance
Compliance with use of compression therapy during the study.
Time frame: 12 months from recruitment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.