The progression of brain lesions after severe head trauma or subarachnoid hemorrhage results from extra cranial aggression which is well controlled in intensive care and intracranial aggression which is less well known and therefore less well managed. The detection of events that can generate new lesions from intracranial monitoring is limited and late once the lesions are irreversible. Invasive cortical depolarizations (SD) can be observed using cortical electrodes and an acquisition system having access to the usually filtered DC signal (0 to 1 Hz). SD are observed at the onset of a new attack of the cortex and spread widely away from the site of aggression. During their propagation, SD generate a significant metabolic demand, and can cause ischemic injury, particularly after meningeal or post-traumatic hemorrhage. SDs are therefore both a marker of new lesion and a mechanism of progression of primary lesions. Yet this type of monitoring is only performed in some expert centers around the world. The analysis of the feasibility and safety of the placement of cortical electrodes in this indication is therefore an essential step to study the clinical benefit of individualized management on the basis of this monitoring.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
20
The intervention consist in implanting 6 electrodes in subdural or intra cortical position and monitor the central nervous system activity. This monitoring will be additional to the usual monitoring.
Service d'Anesthésie réanimation Groupement hospitalier Est, hôpital Pierre Wertheimer
Bron, France
Evaluation of Invasive cortical depolarization (SD) recorded in a non-expert center with subdural or intra cortical implanted electrode and central nervous system monitoring.
The feasibility of the study will be objectivized by the availability of a signal of sufficient quality to be exploited, with or without SD: namely a signal without artifact on more than 30% of the recording period on at least 3 electrodes on 6 for at least 12h. The signal analysis should, at least twice a day, allow intervening with the patient if necessary.
Time frame: 18 months
Evaluation of electrode implantation safety
Safety will be evaluated recording severe and non-severe adverse events during implantation procedure.
Time frame: during implantation procedure
Evaluation of electrode implantation safety
Safety will be evaluated recording severe and non-severe adverse events during monitoring
Time frame: during monitoring, maximum 15 days
Evaluation of electrode implantation safety.
Safety will be evaluated recording severe and non-severe adverse events during electrode extraction.
Time frame: during electrode extraction
Evaluation of temporality between Invasive cortical depolarization and intracranial hypertension.
proportion of patient with Invasive cortical depolarization before, during and after intracranial hypertension.
Time frame: during monitoring, maximum 15 days
Evaluation of temporality between Invasive cortical depolarization and oxygen in tissue decreasing pressure
proportion of patient with Invasive cortical depolarization before during and after oxygen in tissue decreasing.
Time frame: during monitoring, maximum 15 days
Evaluation of temporality between Invasive cortical depolarization and detection of a vasospasm
proportion of patient with Invasive cortical depolarization before during and after detection of a vasospasm.
Time frame: during monitoring, maximum 15 days
Evaluation of temporality between Invasive cortical depolarizations and EEG change of rhythm.
proportion of patient with Invasive cortical depolarization before, during and after EEG change of rhythm.
Time frame: during monitoring, maximum 15 days
Evaluation of temporality between Invasive cortical depolarization and detection of a new cerebral lesion.
proportion of patient with Invasive cortical depolarization before, during and after detection of a new cerebral lesion.
Time frame: during monitoring, maximum 15 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.