This study compares and evaluates differences in movement analysis, patient-reported outcome, radiological assesment and muscular function between patients undergoing carpometacarpal joint arthroplasty with use of modern implants and trapeziectomy with suspensionplasty
Osteoarthritis of first carpometacarpal joint is the most common degenerative disease of upper limb. According to data available in literature, it affects about 30% of women and 6% of men at the age of 45. Increasing with age, it rises up to 90% in people by the age of 80. Due to more widely spread electronic devices in offices, at work, at home which requires usage of thumb, increase in numbers mentioned above is strongly probable. The main symptoms are: pain, loose of grip strength and loose of function. The latter is most important fact, since about 50% of hand function is possible only with healthy thumb. In many cases osteoarthritis can be treated by combined NSAIDs and splinting with rehabilitation. Sometimes when symptoms do not respond to non-operative treatment, there is a need for surgery. Trapeziectomy is the most common choice for operative treatment for end-stage basal thumb osteoarthritis. However, many other techniques were developed, there is continuous dispute over selecting the optimal . One of the most promising is arthroplasty using prosthesis. Last years many important advances were made in a design of implant and materials. Moreover the investigators now have many longer outcomes of such operation made in the past. All this data make us think more about using this technique often, since there are papers which show superiority over classical trapeziectomy. Even though there are several studies comparing functional and objective outcome of those techniques, there is a lack of evidence in terms of biomechanical analysis, thenar muscle activity and changes in movement patterns. Moreover there is no study published so far which considers modern implants and trapeziectomy with suspensionplasty. The aim of the study is to examine relationships between movement analysis (kinematic and functional outcomes), patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) and X-ray measurement, electromyography both pre- and post-operatively.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
40
Surgical removal of trapezium bone and ligamentoplasty of first metacarpal bone using abductor pollicis tendon
Surgical removal of degenerated joint surfaces nad replacement using modern designed prothesis
Department of Othopedics and Rehabilitation, Medical University of Warsaw
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, Poland
Changes in patients reported outcomes - DASH (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand)
To measure overall disabilities of upper limb. Results range from 0 to 100, with lower scores corresponding to better outcomes.
Time frame: at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
Changes in patients reported outcomes - PRWE (Patient Related Wrist Evaluation)
To measure wrist pain and disability in activities of daily living. Results range from 0 to 50, with lower scores corresponding to better outcomes.
Time frame: at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
Changes in patients reported outcomes - Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionaire
To explore differences in higher levels of activity at work and social participation. Results range from 0 to 100, with higher scores corresponding to better outcomes.
Time frame: at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
Changes in patients reported outcomes - SF-36 (Short Form 36)
To explore differences in quality of life. Results range from 0 to 100, with higher scores corresponding to better outcomes.
Time frame: at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
Changes in patients reported outcome measures - VAS (Visual Analogue Score)
To explore differences in pain. Results range from 0 to 100, with lower scores corresponding to better outcomes.
Time frame: at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
Changes in carpometacarpal, carpophalangeal and wrist range of motion
To explore differences in range of motion. This parameter will be measured with goniometer in flexion, extension, adduction and abduction in all thumb joints. Outcomes would be numers of degrees ranging from 0-360, with higher number corresponding with better outcomes
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
Changes in usage of painkillers
To asses evolution of post-operative thumb pain. Dosage, frequency of utilisation and type of medicines will be measured in self-designed questionnaire, with lower dosage, lower frequency and less powerful medicines corresponding with better results
Time frame: at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
Operation related complications
To count and asses all complications that may occur during surgery and in postoperative period
Time frame: at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
Arthroplasty revision surgeries
To count and asses the reason of all revision surgeries that may occur during postoperative period
Time frame: at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
Biomechanical 3D motion analysis
Movements in whole range are measured using 3D motion analysis, using a special software. With more physiological movement patterns corresponding with better results
Time frame: at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
Radiological outcome on x-rays
To asses any changes in alignment of implants with would be measured with degrees (angles) with more degrees of change after operation corresponding with worse outcome
Time frame: at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
Muscle strength outcomes
Muscle strength during grip measured using maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC)
Time frame: at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
EMG measured bioelectrical potentials
Percutaneus electromyography (EMG) will be performed to measure bioelectrical potentials of thumb muscles, to assess ability to contracture
Time frame: at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively