This is a small-scale proof-of concept clinical trial of amobarbital as a treatment to prevent post-traumatic osteoarthritis in fractured ankle joints. The study is a double blind, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, stepwise trial. Amobarbital will be delivered to ankle joints in solution with hyaluronic acid (HA) as a vehicle. Amobarbital/HA injections (active dose) will be compared to HA alone (placebo dose). Our primary goal is to confirm safety, but we will also assess whether treatment improves chondrocyte viability and decreases synovial inflammation. The intervention that will be utilized has proven to be effective using vitro and in vivo models. The study team will assess safety and begin to evaluate efficacy of amobarbital/Gel-One in patients having sustained tibial pilon fractures. The study team will use advanced imaging-based methods we have developed to characterize how joints subjected to varying levels of fracture severity and residual elevated contact stress respond in treated and control groups.
This is a small-scale proof-of concept clinical trial of amobarbital as a treatment to prevent post-traumatic osteoarthritis in fractured ankle joints. The study is a double blind, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, stepwise trial. Amobarbital will be delivered to ankle joints in solution with hyaluronic acid (HA) as a vehicle. Amobarbital/HA injections (active dose) will be compared to HA alone (placebo dose). Our primary goal is to confirm safety, but we will also assess whether treatment improves chondrocyte viability and decreases synovial inflammation. The intervention that will be utilized has proven to be effective using vitro and in vivo models. The study team will assess safety and begin to evaluate efficacy of amobarbital/Gel-One in patients having sustained tibial pilon fractures. The study team will use advanced imaging-based methods we have developed to characterize how joints subjected to varying levels of fracture severity and residual elevated contact stress respond in treated and control groups. Phase I:6 subjects will be treated with a single dose open label, and safety measures will be assessed. Phase II: Once initial safety is confirmed, 20 amobarbital:10 control subjects will be treated with the single dose at the initial operation. Assuming continued safety, an additional 20 amobarbital:10 control subjects will be treated with two doses and evaluated. The second dose of 2.5 mM amobarbital will be administered during the second operation. Subjects will participate in the following procedures: SOC surgical intervention Randomization to Amobarbital/Gel-One arm or control arm X-rays CT scans Blood and urine Questionnaires
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
5
One dose of amobarbital/Gel-One during the initial surgical intervention
One dose of placebo during the initial surgical intervention
One dose of amobarbital/Gel-One during the initial surgical intervention. A second dose will be administered during the second surgical intervention.
One dose of placebo during the initial surgical intervention. A second dose will be administered during the second surgical intervention.
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
Number of Participants With Systemic Adverse Events Defined as Abnormal Laboratory Values and Number Where Amobarbital is Detected Systemically
Safety Measures: CBC and standard clinical chemistry assays to quantify circulating, ALT, AST, Bilirubin, Creatinine, and BUN and the measurement of urine protein content will be evaluated and the number of participants with clinically significant abnormal laboratory values will be determined. Presence of amobarbital will be tested in blood and urine samples and the number of subjects it is detected in will be reported.
Time frame: Pre-op baseline on the day before external fixation surgery (within 24 hours of injury), immediately post-op, and at 1, 2, and 4 days post-op. At the time of internal fixation (3-21 days after external fixation) and at 1, 2, and 4 days post-op.]
Determine the Number of Participants With a Change of Local Toxicity in Tissues. (Outcome Discontinued)
Local toxicity will be determined by examining the osteochondral fragments obtained during the internal fixation surgery for cartilage and synovial histological changes. This outcome was discontinued. Samples were not taken and this measurement was not completed.
Time frame: Pre-op baseline on the day before external fixation surgery (within 24 hours of injury), immediately post-op, and at 1, 2, and 4 days post-op. At the time of internal fixation (3-21 days after external fixation) and at 1, 2, and 4 days post-op.
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) - Pain Interference
Pain Interference scale. Higher scores indicate greater pain interference (worse score). Result is reported as a T-score, with the population norm at 50 and a standard deviation of 10.
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, and 24 months
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) Physical Function
Physical Function - T-score - mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Therefore a person with a T-score of 40 is one SD below the mean. Higher is better.
Time frame: 3, 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up visit
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) Global Health Questionnaires - Mental Health and Physical Health Scores
Global Health - T-score - mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Therefore a person with a T-score of 40 is one SD below the mean. Higher is better.
Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up
American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Score.
0-100 point scale with 100 perfect ankle function
Time frame: 6,12 and 24 month follow-up
Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI). ADL and Sports Scores
Description: Results are reported on a percentage scale with 100% perfect (higher is better)
Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up
CT-based Fracture Energy
Fracture energy is measured in Joules. It is from CT data and measured computationally. It is a continuous measure - Higher Joules = more energy = worse fracture
Time frame: calculated at 6 month follow-up
CT-based Contact Stress
Vertical CT scan of ankle are segmented and analyzed using finite element analysis. Results are expressed as Contract Stress Exposure (MPa) across areas. Scans were completed in 4 participants at baseline, 4 participants at 6 month visit, 1 participant at month 12 and 1 participant at month 24. Contact stress measurements were not completed on any scans and are not avaialble.
Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up
CT-based Joint Space Width
Vertical CT scan of ankle used to measure Joint Space Width at several locations to measure distance to calculate the mean tibiotalar joint space (mm).
Time frame: Month 0, 6, 12
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.