The purpose of the Study is to compare the outcomes of the surgical and the percutaneous approach to the upper extremity access (axillary or brachial artery) during endovascular procedures on the aortic valve, the aorta, and its side branches.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
700
access to the axillary or brachial artery during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI), Fenestrated/Branched-Endovascular Aortic Repair (F/BEVAR), chimney-EVAR (Ch-EVAR) or visceral side branches stenting
Ascension St John Hospital and Medical Center
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Medical University of Vienna
Vienna, Austria
optimal hemostasis
Closure success rate of the procedure without any adjunctive procedures
Time frame: 30 days
vascular complications
freedom from major access vascular complications requiring adjunctive endovascular or open procedures
Time frame: 30 days
Incidence of permanent peripheral nerve injury
freedom from permanent peripheral nerve injury with functional compromise
Time frame: 30 days
stroke Incidence
freedom from periprocedural stroke
Time frame: periprocedural
Durability of vessel closure
freedom from secondary intervention at access site
Time frame: 30 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Imelda Hospital
Bonheiden, Belgium
Service de Chirurgie Thoracique et Cardiovasculaire
Rennes, France
University Hospital of Cologne
Cologne, Germany
Asklepios Klinik St. Georg
Hamburg, Germany
University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg
Hamburg, Germany
University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, Germany
University hospital Leipzig
Leipzig, Germany
IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital
Milan, Italy
...and 8 more locations