In this study, in addition of conventional treatment, the efficacy of the medical device, Remedee One, in medical care of patients with peripheral osteoarthritis pain is evaluated.
Osteoarthritis affects 10 millions people in France (17% of the population). It's the second cause of disability and consultation after the cardiovascular diseases in France. For the moment, there is no curative treatment for osteoarthritis The main clinical sign of this disease is pain and care is based on the treatment of pain and on the improvement of functionnal disability. The proposed treatments are mainly based on the use of oral analgesics treatments . At present, patients report to be insufficiently relieved. New strategies need to be developed. The hypothesis is that the use of an innovative medical device, Remedee One, can reduce the pain felt by patients, improve their quality of life and reduce the analgesics consumption. The choice is oriented on the peripheral osteoarthritis and excludes spinal osteoarthritis because it's an osteoarthritis always asymptomatic and painless.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
60
Conventional pain treatement with daily sessions with innovative medical device for pain management (radiation in millimeter band) at the rate of 1 to 3 sessions by day of 40 minutes for 3 months.
University Hospital
Grenoble, France
Comparison of pain (evaluates with visual analogue scale ) with and without the use of medical device in patients with peripheral osteoarthritis who benefit from their conventional pain treatment.
At the end of each month for each period of the cross-over, the pain is evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS).
Time frame: 7 months
Comparison of quality of life (evaluated with the EQ5D5L questionnaire), with and without the use of the medical device, in patients with peripheral osteoarthritis who benefit from their conventional pain treatment.
At the end of each of the cross-over period, the quality of life is evaluated with the score obtained using the EQ5D-5L (5-level EuroQol version) questionnaire.
Time frame: 7 months
Comparison of depressive state and coping (evaluated with the HAD questionnaire), with and without the use of the medical device in patients with peripheral osteoarthritis receiving their conventional pain treatment..
At the end of each of the cross-over period, the depressive state and coping are evaluated with the score obtained using the HAD (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) questionnaire.
Time frame: 7 months
Comparison of functional capacity (evaluated with the WOMAC questionnaire) with and without the use of the medical device in patients suffering from osteoarthritis of the lower limbs and benefiting from their conventional pain treatment.
At the end of each of the cross-over period, the functional capacity is evaluated with the score obtained using the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index) questionnaire.
Time frame: 7 months
Comparison of the functional capacity (evaluatet with the DREISER questionnaire) with and without the use of the medical device in patients with digital osteoarthritis and benefiting from their conventional pain treatment.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
At the end of each of the cross-over period, the functional capacity is evaluated with the score obtained using the DREISER (Functional Index for Hand OsteoArthritis) questionnaire.
Time frame: 7 months
Number of analgesic consumption, with and without the use of the medical device, in patients with peripheral osteoarthritis and benefiting from their conventional pain treatment.
At the end of each of the cross-over period, the analgesic consumption are assessed by their class, dose and number of dose taken.
Time frame: 7 months
Number of care consumption with and without the use of the medical device in patients with peripheral osteoarthritis and benefiting from their conventional pain treatment.
At the end of each of the cross-over period, the number of drugs consumed (phytotherapy, homeopathy, food supplements), the number of medical acts, medical consultations, hospitalisations, the number of complementary medicine (acupuncture...) and psycho-behavioural therapies are assessed.
Time frame: 7 months
Adverse effect from the medical device.
At the end of each of the cross-over period, the number of adverse effects from the medical device is assessed.
Time frame: 7 months
Charaterization of the sleep quality (evaluated with a qualitative visual satisfaction scale) with and without the use of medical device in patients with peripheral osteoarthritis and benefiting from their conventional pain treatment.
At the end of each of the cross-over period, the sleep quality is evaluated using a qualitative visual satisfaction scale (score between 0 to 10).
Time frame: 7 months
Description of the medical device use
Log files of the medical device are extracted. The number and the duration of each session are analysed.
Time frame: 7 months
Medical device acceptability : descriptive analysis
Open question will be asked in a questionnaire without scale. A descriptive analysis will be done with the answers.
Time frame: 7 months