The objective of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility and acceptability of the algorithm utilized within a cancer rehab program, named Comprehensive Oncology Rehabilitation and Exercise (CORE) program, among newly diagnosed stage I-III breast cancer survivors, providers, and clinic staff. Additionally, this study aims to generate preliminary estimates on the extent to which CORE, compared with standard of care (SOC), elicits engagement in exercise and impacts changes in physical function and quality of life within this population.
Enrollment: The study team will recruit 72 newly diagnosed stage I-III breast cancer survivors to participate in a 24-week randomized controlled trial. Participants will be randomized to CORE or SOC in a 2:1 ratio, stratified by adherence to national physical activity guidelines. Exercise Intervention: Participants randomized to standard of care will be instructed to continue their typical lifestyle activity. Participants randomized to CORE will complete an in-clinic assessment consisting of the PROMIS Physical Function and Godin surveys to identify the appropriate pathway for triage. Results from the questionnaires will be used to triage participants into one of three groups: 1. Physical Medicine \& Rehabilitation (PM\&R): This rehab service is aimed at improving complex and acute functional deficits. Participants with a T-score \< 40 on PROMIS will be triaged to PM\&R, regardless of current exercise engagement. 2. Personal Optimism With Exercise Recovery (POWER): POWER is our institution's exercise oncology program. POWER is aimed at improving mild functional deficits and physical deconditioning. Participants with a T-score of 40-50 on PROMIS who are not meeting activity guidelines, will be triaged to POWER. Participants with a T-score of ≥ 40 who are meeting activity guidelines, may choose to participate in POWER or be re-triaged to Exercise Self-Management. 3. Exercise Self-Management: This arm is aimed for participants who are fit and free of functional deficits and impaired physical conditioning. Participants with a T-score of ≥ 51 on PROMIS and currently meeting activity guidelines will be triaged to this group. They may choose to participate in POWER. Assessments: Five assessment methods will be collected over three time points: (1) Post-Diagnosis/Pre-Surgery, (2) Post-Surgery, and (3) 24-weeks Post-Surgery.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
\[see arm/group descriptions\]
Huntsman Cancer Institute
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Percentage of participants who complete in-clinic assessment
Percentage of participants who complete the in-clinic assessment will be used to determine the feasibility of CORE. Clinic staff will ask the participant to complete the PROMIS and Godin surveys for triaging into the CORE algorithm. CORE will be considered feasible if ≥ 66% of participants complete the in-clinic assessment and are assigned to one of the three pathways in the algorithm.
Time frame: Measured at Post-Diagnosis/Pre-Surgery assessment
Percentage of participants who complete their referral
Percentage of participants who complete their referral to a service pathway will be used to determine the feasibility of CORE. If the participant is triaged into PM\&R or POWER groups based on in-clinic assessment, provider will submit a referral in participant's electronic medical record. Once the referral is submitted, patient navigation staff will be notified and immediately reach out to the participant to schedule with the referred service. CORE will be considered feasible if ≥ 50% of those referred to a service pathway (PM\&R or POWER) complete their referral.
Time frame: Measured at Post-Diagnosis/Pre-Surgery assessment
Percentage of themes identified from focus groups that contain positive feedback
To determine the acceptability of CORE, the study team will conduct focus groups one year after implementation of CORE. Four focus groups will be conducted among participants in CORE, and one focus group will be conducted among providers and clinic staff.
Time frame: Upon completion of 24-weeks post-surgery SOC visit for participants and about one year post-implementation (approximately 1 year into data collection)
Change in exercise engagement assessed via accelerometer
Researchers will examine the extent to which CORE elicits exercise engagement before and after breast cancer surgery compared to standard of care. At each assessment visit, participants will be provided with an Actigraph GT9X Link tri-axial accelerometer to objectively assess exercise engagement, and will be instructed to wear the device for seven days following their assessment.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
72
Time frame: Measured one-week Post-Diagnosis/Pre-Surgery SOC visit, one-week Post-Surgery SOC visit, and one-week 24-Weeks Post-Surgery SOC visit
Change in exercise engagement assessed via modified Godin survey
Researchers will examine the extent to which CORE elicits exercise engagement before and after breast cancer surgery compared to standard of care. At each assessment visit, participants will be asked to fill out the modified Godin survey that measures typical weekly frequency of engagement in strenuous, moderate, and mild aerobic exercise. The modified version also inquires about average length of time of aerobic exercise engagement and frequency of resistance exercise.
Time frame: Measured one-week Post-Diagnosis/Pre-Surgery SOC visit, one-week Post-Surgery SOC visit, and one-week 24-Weeks Post-Surgery SOC visit