The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of minimally invasive decompression and fusion over the traditional open decompression and fusion in patients with single-level lumbar stenosis caused by degenerative spondylolisthesis. Postoperative follow-up will continue for 12 months. Сlinical, safety, radiological and cost-effectiveness endpoints will be evaluated.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
96
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion will be performed using minimally invasive approach or traditional open technique.
Priorov National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics
Moscow, Russia
Change from baseline in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
To observe the change of ODI as compared to baseline through follow-up terms. min - 0, - the best result, patient is active; max - 50 - the worst result, patient is not physically active
Time frame: 3 months
Change from baseline in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
To observe the change of ODI as compared to baseline through follow-up terms. min - 0, - the best result, patient is active; max - 50 - the worst result, patient is not physically active
Time frame: Through 2 years
Change from baseline in Numeric Pain Rating Score (NPRS)
To observe the change of NPRS as compared to baseline through follow-up terms (0 - no pain, 10 - unbearable pain)
Time frame: Through 2 years
Change from baseline in EuroQol Five-Dimensional descriptive system questionnaire (EQ-5D).
To observe the change of EQ-5D as compared to baseline through follow-up terms. It assesses 5 components related to aspects of life: mobility, self-care, activity in daily life, pain, anxiety or depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems.
Time frame: Through 2 years
Change from baseline in Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4)
To observe the change of DN4 as compared to baseline through follow-up terms. The scale result ranges 0-10 points. The sum \> 4 points indicates the neuropathic component of pain
Time frame: Through 2 years
Change from baseline in The Health Transition Item from SF-36 (HTI Item)
To observe the change of HTI Item through follow-up terms. Patient's answers range from ''Much Better,'' ''Somewhat Better,'' ''About the Same,'' ''Somewhat Worse,'' to ''Much Worse.''
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Through 2 years
Change from baseline in Clinical Global Impression Of Change (CGIC) scale
To observe the change of CGIC through follow-up terms. The answers range from "-2 Significantly worse compared to Baseline" to "+2 Significantly improved compared to Baseline". 7-points scale indicates the patient's condition assessed by physician.
Time frame: Through 2 years
Cost-effectiveness
Total cost of surgical procedure (implanted system, the salary for surgery team) and the cost of patient's staying at the clinic before discharge.
Time frame: 14th day of hospital stay
Fusion rate success
Interbody fusion rate on CT based on Tan grades
Time frame: 12 months and 24 months post op
Surgery duration
Surgery duration, min
Time frame: Day of surgery
Reoperations rate
Incidence of reoperations
Time frame: Through 2 years
Pelvic Incidence
To observe the sagittal balance parameter - Pelvic Incidence - by sagittal scans of spine by X-Ray, in degrees
Time frame: Through 2 years
Change from baseline in Pelvic Tilt
To observe the sagittal balance parameter - Pelvic Tilt - by sagittal scans of spine by X-Ray compared to baseline, in degrees
Time frame: Through 2 years
Change from baseline in Global Lordosis Angle
To observe the sagittal balance parameter - Global Lordosis Angle - by sagittal scans of spine by X-Ray compared to baseline, in degrees
Time frame: Through 2 years
Change from baseline in Segmental Lordosis
To observe the sagittal balance parameter - Segmental Lordosis (the angle of treated level) - by sagittal scans of spine by X-Ray compared to baseline, in degrees
Time frame: Through 2 years
Change from baseline in Sagittal Vertical Axis
To observe the sagittal balance parameter - Sagittal Vertical Axis - by sagittal scans of spine by X-Ray compared to baseline, in mm
Time frame: Through 2 years
Adverse Events
Document Adverse Events (incl. adverse events related to device) occurrence throughout the study
Time frame: Through 2 years