Chemotherapy-induced oropharyngeal mucositis (OM) negatively impacts the quality of life of adult and pediatric patients by causing pain, dysphagia, dysgeusia and dysphonia. Photobiomodulation (PBM) by low level laser therapy (LLLT), light therapy of low level of red and infrared wavelengths (630-1000 nm) has been recommended since 2014 in patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy for bone marrow transplantation. Available pediatric studies highlighted positive/promising results of PBM with excellent safety and no adverse effects. Nevertheless, a wide variety of application parameters is described in the literature, with no consensus guidelines. Considering the lack of standardized protocol of photobiomodulation in the pediatric population as well as the burden and cost of a daily application, investigators have decided to conduct, for the first time in children of 3 years of age or older, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority clinical trial to compare two PBM protocols with same PBM parameters, combining red and infrared wavelengths, but with different frequencies of laser application (daily versus every other day), in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced OM of WHO grade 2 or higher.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
406
Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) protocol combining red and infrared wavelengths applied every other day
Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) protocol combining red and infrared wavelengths applied daily
University hospital of Toulouse
Toulouse, Occitanie, France
RECRUITINGUniversity hospital of Angers
Angers, France
RECRUITINGUniversity hospital of Besançon
Besançon, France
RECRUITINGUniversity hospital of Grenoble
Grenoble, France
RECRUITINGUniversity hospital of Lille
Lille, France
RECRUITINGUniversity hospital of Limoges
Limoges, France
RECRUITINGHôpital La Timone
Marseille, France
RECRUITINGUniversity hospital of Nancy
Nancy, France
RECRUITINGUniversity Hospital of Nice
Nice, France
RECRUITINGArmand Trousseau Hospital
Paris, France
RECRUITING...and 6 more locations
Session evaluation
Duration (in days) from the day of first PBM session up to the day of first measurement when patient has no longer WHO grade 2 or higher chemotherapy-induced OM related pain at 2 consecutive measurements before the next scheduled PBM session (either active laser application or matching placebo application)
Time frame: Throught treatment period up to 1 month
Production costs evaluation
Production costs from the hospital perspective and efficacy (i.e. number of days after which a child has no longer mucositis related pain as described in the primary endpoint section) to build Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) comparing every other day LLLT application versus with daily LLLT application.
Time frame: 2 months
Health insurance evaluation
Costs of inpatient hospital stays from the French health insurance perspective.
Time frame: 2 months
OM duration evaluation
Duration (in days) of chemotherapy-induced OM of WHO grade 2 or higher between the day of first PBM session up to the day of first measurement when patient has no longer WHO grade 2 or higher chemotherapy-induced OM at 2 consecutive measurements before the next scheduled PBM session (either every other day application or daily application).
Time frame: Throught treatment period up to 1 month
OM occurrence
Occurrence of chemotherapy-induced OM of WHO grade 3 or 4 (deterioration of the clinical situation).
Time frame: 2 months
Feed evaluation
Occurrence of enteral feeding.
Time frame: 2 months
Analgesic consumption
Duration (in days) of consumption of step 2 and step 3 analgesics during chemotherapy-induced OM of WHO grade 2 or higher.
Time frame: 2 months
PBM evaluation
Duration (in days) from the day of first PBM session up to the day of first measurement when patient has no longer WHO grade 2 or higher chemotherapy-induced OM related pain at 2 consecutive measurements before the next scheduled PBM session (either active laser application or matching placebo application) as evaluated, regardless of patient's age, with the ChIMES scale and use of step 3 analgesics.
Time frame: Through treatment period up to 1 month
Pain change evaluation
Change over time in WHO grade 2 or higher chemotherapy-induced OM related pain, as assessed by pain scales (HEDEN (Hétero Evaluation Douleur Enfant) mucositis scale (5 items ranging from 0 to 2) or VAS (ranging from 0 to 10)depending on patient's age category, and Children's International Mucositis Evaluation Scale (4 items ranging from 0 to 5) whatever patient's age category)
Time frame: From baseline to each day of PBM session
Adverse events occurrence
Occurrence of adverse events reported according to descriptions and grading scale found in NCI CTCAE version 5.0.
Time frame: 2 months
thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) evolution
TSH shift from baseline value classified according to the following three categories: "\< 0.4 IU/mL", "\[0.4 - 10\] IU/mL", "\> 10 IU/mL", to value at D14-31 after end of WHO grade 2 or higher chemotherapy-induced OM classified according to the same three categories.
Time frame: From baseline to 2 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.