Aim: Although regional anesthesia (RA) techniques are advantageous in the anesthetic management of obese patients (body mass index (BMI)≥30); their performances can still be associated with technical difficulties and greater failure rates. The aim of this study is to compare the performance properties and analgesic efficacy of ultrasound (US)-guided bilateral thoracic paravertebral blocks (TPVBs) in obese and non-obese patients. Material methods: After obtaining ethics committee approval; data of 82 patients, who underwent elective bilateral reduction mammaplasty under general anesthesia with adjunctive TPVB analgesia between December of 2016 and February of 2020, were reviewed. Patients were allocated into two groups with respect to their BMI scores (Group NO: BMI\<30 and Group O: BMI≥30). Demographics, TPVB ideal US image visualization and performance times, needle tip visualisation and TPVB performance difficulties, number of needle maneuvers, surgical, anesthetic and analgesic follow-up parameters, incidence of postoperative nausea vomiting (PONV), sleep duration, length of postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and hospital stay, patient and surgeon satisfaction scores were all investigated and compared.
Aim: The number of obese patients (body mass index (BMI)≥30) has increased dramatically worldwide, and we, as anesthesiologists, routinely come up against them in our daily clinical practice. Although the preference of various peripheral and neuroaxial regional anesthesia (RA) techniques seems to be advantageous in the anesthetic management of these patients, their performances can also be associated with technical difficulties and greater failure rates. The aim of this study is to compare the performance properties and analgesic efficacy of ultrasound (US)-guided thoracic paravertebral blocks (TPVBs) in obese and non-obese patients. Material methods: After obtaining ethics committee approval; data of 82 patients, who underwent elective bilateral reduction mammaplasty under general anesthesia with adjunctive TPVB analgesia between December of 2016 and February of 2020, were reviewed. Patients were allocated into two groups with respect to their BMI scores (Group NO: BMI\<30 and Group O: BMI≥30). Demographics, TPVB ideal US image visualization and performance times, needle tip visualisation and TPVB performance difficulties, number of needle maneuvers, surgical, anesthetic and analgesic follow-up parameters, incidence of postoperative nausea vomiting (PONV), sleep duration, length of postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and hospital stay, patient and surgeon satisfaction scores were all investigated and compared. Student's t, Mann-Whitney-U and Chi-square tests were used for statistical analysis.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
82
The blocks were performed at the T3-T4 level bilaterally to block the dermatomes between the T2 and T6 levels (breast innervation area).
Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) performance time
Time period between the US probe placement to the right side at T3-T4 level and the needle withdrawal from the left side T3-T4 level
Time frame: 0-20 minutes
Postoperative numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores
NRS pain scores (0: no pain, 10: worst pain imaginable) through postoperative first 24 hours
Time frame: 0-24 hours
Ideal US image visualization time
Time period between the US probe placement at T3-T4 level and visualizing the ideal image to perform the block
Time frame: 0-5 minutes
Difficulty of needle tip visualization
Likert scale: 1-5 (1:very poor, 5:very good)
Time frame: 0-20 minutes
Number of needle maneuvers to reach the paravertebral space
Number of needle maneuvers to reach the paravertebral space (PVS)
Time frame: 0-20 minutes
Requirement of additional maneuver due to insufficient local anesthetic spread
Requirement of additional needle maneuver due to insufficient local anesthetic (LA) spread
Time frame: 0-20 minutes
Difficulty of TPVB according to the anesthesiologists
Likert scale: 1-5 (1:very poor, 5:very good)
Time frame: 0-20 minutes
Length of stay in postoanesthesia care unit (PACU)
Modified Aldrete Scoring system (≥9/10)
Time frame: 0-1 hours
Number of patients required fentanyl intraoperatively
If a ≥ 20% increase above preinduction values in MAP or HR was observed during the perioperative period, additional fentanyl dose (1 μg/kg) was applied intravenously.
Time frame: Intraoperative 2-6 hours
Time to postoperative first pain
Postoperative first pain description (NRS ≥4) until discharge
Time frame: 0-48 hours
Number of paracetamol requirement through the postoperative first 24 hours
Paracetamol was used when postoperative pain NRS ≥4 in the postanesthesia care unit or on the wards (on postoperative day 1)
Time frame: 0-24 hours
Number of tramadol requirement through the postoperative first 24 hours
Tramadol was used when postoperative pain NRS ≥4 again after 1 hour of paracetamol application in the postanesthesia care unit or on the wards (on postoperative day 1)
Time frame: 0-24 hours
Incidence of PONV through the postoperative first 24 hours
Number of feeling nausea or vomiting
Time frame: 0-24 hours
Duration of sleep through the postoperative first 24 hours
Total hours of sleep at first night
Time frame: 0-24 hours
Length of hospital stay
Post Anaesthetic Discharge Scoring System (PADSS) (≥9/10)
Time frame: 0-48 hours
Patient satisfaction
Satisfaction score during hospital discharge: 0: very unsatisfied, 3: very satisfied
Time frame: 0-48 hours
Surgeon satisfaction
Satisfaction score during hospital discharge: 0: very unsatisfied, 3: very satisfied
Time frame: 0-48 hours
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.