Our primary objective in this 10-week pilot study is to demonstrate the feasibility of using videoconferencing technology to provide Parkinson's Disease (PD) patients, alongside their supervising care partners, specialized physical and occupational therapy (PT/OT) focused on neurorehabilitation that ultimately aims to reduce fall risk. This therapy is similar to what a PD patient could receive in-person with neurologic-certified physical therapists and occupational therapists with significant experience working with PD patients and addressing their needs, but it is delivered through a virtual platform. Feasibility is defined by measures of adherence, retention, and safety. The specialized PT and OT measurement tools and strategies used in this study are in-line with the most current formal evidence-based guidelines/recommendations available for therapy in PD: European Physiotherapy Guideline for Parkinson's Disease, Parkinson Evidence Database to Guide Effectiveness (PD-EDGE) Task Force and Guidelines for Occupational Therapy in Parkinson's Disease Rehabilitation. The study duration is approximately 10 weeks of the primary telerehabilitation intervention and a 2 follow-up phone calls at the 3- and 6-month timepoints. There will be one baseline in-person evaluation and one final in-person evaluation following the completion of all televisits. The enrollment target is up to 15-20 patient and care partner (P+CP) pairs, meaning 30-40 subjects total. There are no controls for this study.
Gait dysfunction, postural instability, and freezing-of-gait (FOG) ultimately develop in about 80% of PD patients, which lead to falls and advancing disability. This is significant because the consequences of falls are far-reaching: accelerating immobility due to heightened fear-of-falling, reducing quality of life and independence, and increasing healthcare utilization and costs. Thus, there is an urgent need to expand evidence- based outpatient neurologic-PT/OT services to community-dwelling PD patients to reduce fall risk. This research proposal will address this unmet need by determining whether tele-neurorehabilitation is a care model that can be executed safety for PD patients to provide these services from well-trained therapists who are not easily accessible otherwise. This feasibility data is critical in the development of a novel tele-neurorehabilitation protocol and randomized-controlled efficacy trial thereafter. The impact of the intended research is to demonstrate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of this novel teleconferencing-based delivery of gait and balance exercises/strategies with guided instruction much like one would receive in-person but in the comfort of one's own home. By demonstrating the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of this pilot program, subsequent long-term goals are to apply for larger sources of funding to sustain the program. By leveraging the data gained from these studies it is anticipated the practice of telerehabilitation will be expanded and improved; and ultimately its efficacy to health care policy providers and insurers for potential reimbursement will be demonstrated. The researchers intend to enroll 15-20 individuals with mild-moderate PD into our proposed novel telerehabilitation program, where patients will receive tele-PT/OT home visits and home-safety surveillance with neurologic-specialized therapists who are experienced with the core problem areas seen in PD patients. The intended clinical impact is to improve gait/balance function and postural stability, and thus reduce falls in patients with PD. With the remote telecommunications intervention, we aim to enable the additional clinical impact of expanding access to therapy for people with PD that otherwise would have significant difficulty obtaining this type of multiple-visit, individually-tailored, and specialized therapy care due to travel burden and cost.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
15
Neurologic-specialized and -certified physical and occupational therapists will provide each participant with an initial in-person PT/OT evaluation/treatment session with oversight from a Movement Disorders Neurologist, followed by 4 "virtual home visits" with tele-PT/OT and care partner supervision every 2 weeks, and culminating with a final in-person evaluation, all with a focus on personalized training in core areas contributing to a patient's individual fall risk, much like in-person visits. Virtual home safety surveillance with the mobile virtual platform is an additional feature of this intervention that aims to optimize the home environment to reduce external factors contributing to fall risk.
The VIRTUAL HOME SAFETY EVALUTIONS (HSE)-ONLY ARM where participants ONLY receive the virtual home safety evaluations and surveillance that are built into the original protocol of three of the four tele-OT visits that is being used in Arm 1. The study duration for Arm 2 is about 6 weeks of the primary intervention as described with 3-month and 6-month follow-up calls. The mobile virtual platform for Arm 2 is comprised of a tablet OR smartphone that will be guided through the home by the care partner only and not the patient.
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Adherence Measure - 1:
(1) The proportion of scheduled protocol-driven tele-PT and tele-OT visits that were completed.
Time frame: Through study completion of approximately 18 months.
Adherence Measure - 2:
(2) The proportion of scheduled protocol-driven PT/OT exercises/activities that could be completed virtually as assessed by the instructing study therapist.
Time frame: Through study completion of approximately 18 months.
Adherence Measure - 3:
(3) Qualitative categorization of limitations in performing tele-PT and tele-OT visits and PT/OT exercises/activities virtually into patient-related, technology-related, or environmentally-related limitations
Time frame: Through study completion of approximately 18 months.
Retention Measures:
The proportion of patient and care partner (P+CP) pairs that enrolled and were able to complete the study, i.e. study drop-out rate.
Time frame: Through study completion of approximately 18 months.
Safety Measures:
The number and nature of adverse and serious adverse events that occurred due to participation in the study, and the proportion deemed a result of study-related interventions.
Time frame: Through study completion of approximately 18 months.
Goals Attainment Scale Score:
Change in Goals Attainment Scale score (GAS) from baseline across the 10-week program and at the 3- and 6-month follow-ups (Visits 1, 3, 5, 6, Follow-up Call 1-2) for 3 patient-specific PT goals under the following categories: gait/balance, strengthening, and physical endurance, and 2 patient-specific OT goals under the category of activities-of-daily-living/home safety, defined at the baseline assessment.
Time frame: Through study completion of approximately 18 months.
Falls Diary;
The change in falls frequency using the Falls Diary from baseline across the 10-week program and at the 3- and 6-month follow-ups (Visits 1, 3, 5, 6, Follow-up Call 1-2).
Time frame: Through study completion of approximately 18 months.
Activities-Specific Balance Scale:
The change in gait confidence from baseline using the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence scale (ABC scale) across the 10-week program and at the 3- and 6-month follow-ups (Visits 1, 2-6, Follow-Up Call 1-2)
Time frame: Through study completion of approximately 18 months.
Five-Times Sit-to-Stand Test:
The change in postural stability from baseline using the Five-Times Sit-to-Stand test (FTSTS) across the 10-week program to be performed both in-person and virtually (Visits 1, 3, 5, 6).
Time frame: Through study completion of approximately 18 months.
In-Person Objective Therapy Measure - 1:
The change in the following in-person assessment Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (mini-BESTest) from baseline to post-intervention (Visits 1 and 6).
Time frame: Through study completion of approximately 18 months.
In-Person Objective Therapy Measure - 2:
The change in the following in-person assessment Rapid Turns Test (RTT) from baseline to post-intervention (Visits 1 and 6).
Time frame: Through study completion of approximately 18 months.
In-Person Objective Therapy Measure - 3:
The change in the following in-person assessment Timed Up and Go (TUG)from baseline to post-intervention (Visits 1 and 6).
Time frame: Through study completion of approximately 18 months.
In-Person Objective Therapy Measures - 4:
The change in the following in-person assessment Timed Up and Go-Cognitive (TUG-Cognitive) from baseline to post-intervention (Visits 1 and 6).
Time frame: Through study completion of approximately 18 months.
In-Person Objective Therapy Measure - 5:
The change in the following in-person assessment 10-Meter Walk Time (10MWT) from baseline to post-intervention (Visits 1 and 6).
Time frame: Through study completion of approximately 18 months.
In-Person Objective Therapy Measures - 6:
The change in the following in-person assessment 2-Minute Walk Distance Test (2MWT) from baseline to post-intervention (Visits 1 and 6).
Time frame: Through study completion of approximately 18 months.
Rapid Turns Test:
The change in freezing-of-gait from baseline using the Rapid Turns Test (RTT) across the 10-week program to be performed both in-person and virtually (Visits 1, 3, 5, and 6).
Time frame: Through study completion of approximately 18 months.
Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39:
The change in quality-of-life (QOL) using the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) from baseline to post-intervention (Visits 1 and 6).
Time frame: Through study completion of approximately 18 months.
Home Exercise Program:
The proportion of patients who were able to adhere to their recommended home exercise program (HEP) in between study visits as assessed by weekly coordinator phone calls.
Time frame: Through study completion of approximately 18 months.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.