Within this exploratory multicohort phase II trial, SAKK aims to evaluate a PET/CT and ctDNA oriented therapy in DLBCL in order to test the following working hypothesis. * acalabrutinib-R-CHOP may improve the progression free survival in genetically defined DLBCL harboring the MYD88 L265P and/or CD79A/B mutations; * treatment escalation to acalabrutinib-R-CHOP in DLBCL patients who have positive PET/CT (with residual disease scored as Deauville score 4 or 5 with centrally defined response) and no molecular response (\<2log10 reduction of ctDNA) after two courses of R-CHOP could improve the anti-tumour activity of R-CHOP; * treatment de-escalation to 4 total R-CHOP courses plus 2 rituximab single agent infusions does not compromise the outcome in patients lacking both MYD88 L265P and CD79A/B mutations and quickly obtaining both negative PET/CT (Deauville score 1-3) and molecular response (\>2log10 reduction of ctDNA) after two cycles of R-CHOP.
Despite advances in the clinical care of patients with DLBCL and in understanding the biology of this disease, cure rates have remained the same since the introduction of rituximab to CHOP chemotherapy, and R-CHOP chemoimmunotherapy remains the standard of care. Over the last years many phase III trials investigating new agents added to R-CHOP have been performed but they have all invariably failed to improve treatment outcomes. Importantly, three of the most recently completed phase III trials that were developed based on the cell of origin distinction of DLBCL and aimed to improve treatment outcome in the ABC (or non- Germinal center B-Cell (GCB)) subtype by adding a targeted agent to R-CHOP have also failed. This provides clinical evidence that cell of origin may not be an accurate biomarker for treatment decisions. The R - CHOP + investigational drug approach has thus failed either when broadly applied to unselected DLBCL patients or when applied to DLBCL patients selected according to inaccurate biomarkers such as COO. Within this exploratory multicohort phase II trial, SAKK aims to evaluate a PET/CT and ctDNA oriented therapy in DLBCL in order to test the following working hypothesis. * acalabrutinib-R-CHOP may improve the progression free survival in genetically defined DLBCL harboring the MYD88 L265P and/or CD79A/B mutations; * treatment escalation to acalabrutinib-R-CHOP in DLBCL patients who have positive PET/CT (with residual disease scored as Deauville score 4 or 5 with centrally defined response) and no molecular response (\<2log10 reduction of ctDNA) after two courses of R-CHOP could improve the anti-tumour activity of R-CHOP; * treatment de-escalation to 4 total R-CHOP courses plus 2 rituximab single agent infusions does not compromise the outcome in patients lacking both MYD88 L265P and CD79A/B mutations and quickly obtaining both negative PET/CT (Deauville score 1-3) and molecular response (\>2log10 reduction of ctDNA) after two courses R-CHOP. Primary objectives: * Assessing the efficacy of acalabrutinib-R-CHOP in DLBCL harboring MYD88 L265P and/or CD79A/B mutations (cohort A) * Assessing the activity of treatment escalation to acalabrutinib-R-CHOP followed by acalabrutinib monotherapy in DLBCL patients who are double positive: PET/CT positive (Deauville score 4 or 5 with centrally defined response) and no molecular response (\<2log10 fold reduction) after two courses of R-CHOP (cohort B) * Exploring the feasibility of treatment de-escalation to 4 total R-CHOP courses plus two infusions of single agent rituximab in patients lacking both MYD88 L265P and CD79A/B mutations and quickly obtaining both negative PET/CT (Deauville score 1-3) and molecular response (\>2log10 reduction of ctDNA) after two cycles of R-CHOP (cohort C). * Exploring clinical implications of having a negative PET/CT (Deauville score 1-3) but no molecular response (\<2log10 reduction of ctDNA) vs a positive PET/CT (Deauville score 4 or 5 with centrally defined response) but molecular response (\>2log10 reduction of ctDNA) after two R-CHOP courses (cohort D) Secondary objectives: * Safety and tolerability of acalabrutinib-R-CHOP * Assessment of prognostic value of baseline PET radiomics indexes, alone or in association with other parameters
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
260
Cohort A: 6 cycles of acalabrutinib-R-CHOP Cohort B: 2 cycles of R-CHOP and 2 cycles of acalabrutinb-R-CHOP followed by 2 cycles of acalabrutinib single agent Cohort C: 4 cycles of R-CHOP followed by 2 cycles of rituximab single agent Cohort D: 6 cycles of R-CHOP Rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV Day 1, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 IV Day 1, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 IV Day 1, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 (maximum 2 mg) IV Day 1; prednisone 100 mg PO d1-5; Acalabrutinib 100 mg BID Day 1-21, cycles repeated every 21 days
Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII
Bergamo, Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Maggiore della Carita di Novara
Novara, Italy
Policlinico Agostino Gemelli
Roma, Italy
Kantonsspital Aarau
Aarau, Switzerland
Kantonsspital Baden (Baden/Brugg)
Baden, Switzerland
St. Claraspital
Basel, Switzerland
Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana
Bellinzona, Switzerland
Inselspital, Bern
Bern, Switzerland
Kantonsspital Graubünden
Chur, Switzerland
Hopital Fribourgeois
Fribourg, Switzerland
...and 9 more locations
Cohorts A, C and D: Progression free survival (PFS) according to the Lugano criteria
PFS is defined as the time from registration until the first event of interest: * Progressive disease according to the Lugano Classification * Death from any cause Patients not having an event at the time of analysis and patients starting a new anticancer therapy in the absence of an event will be censored at the date of their last tumor assessment showing non-progression before starting a new treatment.
Time frame: from registration until the first event as defined in PFS (estimated 2 years)
Cohort B: Complete remission (CR) rate at the end of therapy according to the Lugano criteria
Patients with CR at the end of therapy will be considered CR. Patients with no tumor assessment at the end of therapy will be considered: * non-CR, if they have no following tumor assessment within the trial (patient died, refused, started a new treatment or was lost to follow-up) or if they have non-CR at the following tumor assessment after the end of therapy. * CR, if they have CR at the following tumor assessment after end of therapy before starting a new treatment.
Time frame: estimated 9 months after registration
Adverse events (AEs)
All AEs will be assessed according to NCI CTCAE v5.0.
Time frame: record throughout treatment phase (until 28 days after last dose of trial treatment)
Overall survival (OS)
OS will be calculated from registration until death from any cause. Patients not experiencing an event will be censored at the last date they were known to be alive.
Time frame: from registration to date of death from any cause (estimated 5 years)
Progression free survival in cohort B
Analogous to the evaluation of the primary endpoint of cohorts A, C and D, but in cohort B.
Time frame: from registration until the first event as defined in PFS (estimated 2 years)
Complete remission rate in cohorts A, C and D
Analogous to the evaluation of the primary endpoint of cohort B, but in cohorts A, C and D.
Time frame: estimated 9 months after registration
Overall response rate (ORR)
ORR at the end of therapy is defined as either PR or CR (OR) according to the Lugano criteria. Patients with no tumor assessment at the end of therapy will be considered: * non-OR, if they have no following tumor assessment within the trial (patient died, refused, started a new treatment or was lost to follow-up) or if they have non-OR at the following tumor assessment after the end of therapy. * OR, if they have OR at the following tumor assessment after end of therapy before starting a new treatment
Time frame: estimated 9 months after registration
Duration of response (DoR)
The DoR will be calculated from when the criteria for CR or PR are met, until documentation of progressive disease thereafter. Only patients with a CR or PR will be included in this analysis. Patients without any documentation of progressive disease thereafter will be censored at the last date of tumor assessment without progression and before the start of a new anti-lymphoma treatment, if any.
Time frame: estimated 2 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.