The aim of the study is to compare longitudinally the clinical performance of dental implants with different surfaces placed in single tooth gaps at the posterior maxilla and mandible of adults. It is a randomized clinical trial, in which participants will be randomly allocated to two groups: test group (implants with hydrophilic surface) and control group (implants with hydrophobic surface). The null hypothesis is that the implant stability quotient of hydrophilic and hydrophobic dental implants show a similar progression after placement in posterior tooth gaps.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
44
A dental implant with hydrophilic surface will be placed and restored in single-tooh gaps of the posterior region of the mandible or maxilla.
A dental implant with hydrophobic surface will be placed and restored in single-tooh gaps of the posterior region of the mandible or maxilla.
Faculty of Dentistry of the Federal University of Goias
Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil
Change of implant stability
Implant stability was set as the primary outcome. The implant stability quotient (ISQ) will be measured using a portable device called Osstell ISQ (Osstell Mentor, Integration Diagnostics, Göteborg, Sweden).
Time frame: 10 time-points will be considered and divided in two phases: surgical and prosthetic. The last measure will occur 1 year after the placement of the definitive implant restoration.
Implant success
Each implant will be assessed according to the health scale of the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI-Pisa health scale). After clinical assessment, each implant will be classified as 'success', 'satisfactory survival', 'compromised survival' or 'failure'.
Time frame: Assessed at the 12-month follow-up visit.
Periimplant bone level
Periapical radiographs will be obtained and the periimplant bone level will be measured and compared longitudinally.
Time frame: Radiographs will be obtained at 4 time points: immediately after implant placement, at the session of the provisional prosthesis installation, and at the 6 and 12-month follow-up visits after the delivery of the definitive prosthesis.
Condition of the periimplant soft tissues
The following parameters will be assessed clinically: presence/absence of bleeding on probing, probing depth, and presence/absence suppuration.
Time frame: 15-days, 6- and 12-month follow-up visits after delivery of the definitive prosthesis.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.