The primary aim of the study is to compare the outcome of one vs two visits endodontics (root canal treatments) performed in general dental practice of infected (necrotic) teeth, one and four years after treatment. Secondary aims are to compare the root filling quality and the frequency of complications for both treatment modalities. A pilot study will identify the shortcomings of the protocol, which will be revised accordingly. A multi-center study in several clinics from five counties throughout Sweden is planned. Consecutive eligible patients (see inclusion and exclusion criteria) with one tooth each will be included. The study sample size calculation was based on a judgement that a minimal worthwhile effect of less than 10% was not clinically relevant. The presumption was that successful outcomes would be of 75% and 65% for the different treatment arms, respectively. Three hundred and fifty six patients per group are thus needed to detect that difference as statistical significant with a power of 80% and an alfa-error of 5%. To compensate for around 30% drop-outs a number of 1000 patients will be recruited. Patients will be randomly enrolled in two arms: one in which the endodontic treatment (root canal treatment) is performed in one visit, and in the other arm in two visits. The allocation sequences for one vs multiple visit endodontics will be computer generated followed by a dark colored envelope concealed allocation. The patients will be contacted by telephone 5-7 days post-operatively, and a control visit at the clinic will be scheduled one month post-operatively to assess complications related to the treatment. A clinical control will be performed at the clinic one and four years after treatment. Intra-oral radiographs will be taken. The radiographs will be examined by two blinded and independent observers. A successful outcome is defined by clinical and radiographic normalcy. The statistical methods selected to analyse the primary outcome will be the Chi square test of 2x2 tables, or Fisher´s exact test when proportions are small and the expected value \<5. The calculations will be two-tailed. Results will be considered statistically significant at p\<0.05.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
1,000
Endodontics (root canal treatment). In the enrolment visit, access, opening and identification of root canals can be performed and a suitable temporization will be placed in the tooth if needed. Root canal treatment can be completed in the same visit or performed in another visit where cleaning, shaping and root filling procedures, temporization or permanent restoration will be performed. These procedures are part of the normal clinical praxis. No rigid protocol will be implemented, as a pragmatic design was chosen.
Endodontics (root canal treatment). In the enrolment visit, access, opening and identification of root canals can be performed and a suitable temporization will be placed in the tooth if needed. Root canal treatment can be started, or performed in another visit, lasting 2 visits. In the first visit cleaning and shaping is performed and a medication is put in place in the canals, and the tooth is temporized until the next visit at least one week apart. In the second visit the tooth is root filled and temporization or permanent restoration will be performed. These procedures are part of the normal clinical praxis. No rigid protocol will be implemented, as a pragmatic design was chosen.
Folktandvården Region Kronoberg
Vaxjo, Kronoberg County, Sweden
RECRUITINGFolktandvården Region Norrbotten
Luleå, Norrbotten County, Sweden
RECRUITINGFolktandvården Region Kalmar
Kalmar, Sweden
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGSmile Tandvård
Luleå, Sweden
RECRUITINGAragón Dental
Malmo, Sweden
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGOris Dental
Malmo, Sweden
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGFolktandvården Region Halland
Varberg, Sweden
RECRUITINGPeriapical health at year 1
Assessment of apical radio-anatomical structures by two independent and blinded observers
Time frame: One year after completed treatment
Periapical health at year 4
Assessment of apical radio-anatomical structures by two independent and blinded observers
Time frame: Four years after completed treatment
Post-operative pain 7 days
Patient self-reported pain at an numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable)
Time frame: 5-7 days post-operatively
Post-operative pain 30 days
Patient self-reported pain at an numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable)
Time frame: 30 days post-operatively
Medication intake
Patient self-reported analgesic and antibiotic intake
Time frame: 30 days post-operatively
Tooth survival at year 1
Presence of root-filled tooth
Time frame: 1 year after completed treatment
Tooth survival at year 4
Presence of root-filled tooth
Time frame: 4 year after completed treatment
Complications
Complications not previously described that can be associated with endodontic treatment
Time frame: 30 days and long-term follow-up at year 1 and 4
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.