This study determines the effectiveness of plantar orthoses and custom-made orthopedic footwear in functional level and quality of life of persons with diabetes type 2 and diabetic peripheral neuropathy. This study is important due the loss of protective sensation, feet are vulnerable to minor trauma caused by plantar pressure as well as mechanical and thermal injuries. Thus, Plantar Orthoses become necessary to reduce PP and align the foot. Additionally, it is known that footwear is the most frequent cause of diabetic foot injury, since ulceration is frequently a consequence of the continuous trauma provoked by inadequate footwear. For a higher efficacy in the treatment of the foot, it is also necessary to use custom-made orthopedic footwear, indicated in the treatment of foot pathologies. The lack of studies that evaluate the impact of this treatment on clinical measures such as quality of life and functional level, led to the development of this study, comparing a standard treatment (standard footwear and plantar orthoses) with an optimal treatment suggested in diabetic foot guidelines (therapeutic footwear and plantar orthoses).
This clinical trial includes 2 parallel intervention groups with a pre- and post-test analysis. In the standard footwear (SF) group, plantar orthoses, standard footwear and education on foot self-care were applied and in the orthopedic footwear (OF) group the same intervention was applied, but with orthopedic footwear. Both intervention groups were evaluated at two different time points, with the pre-test taking place at the beginning of the study (T0 - Baseline) and the post-test taking place 4 months after the application of the treatment (T4). In the middle of the study, at two months (T2) a questionnaire was applied in order to understand the adherence and the perception of individuals about the intervention applied. The screening of diabetic peripheral neuropathy was made with the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) and the description of the sample with an evaluation questionnaire. The FL was evaluated through the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), physical tests and the postural, static and dynamic barometric assessment. QoL was assessed with SF-36 and the adherence and satisfaction with a questionnaire created ad hoc.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
43
The orthopedic footwear used by the OF Group was manufactured by the company J. Andrade Ferreira Neves Lda. with materials suitable for the diabetic foot, as registered with INFARMED under registration ID 279515.
In the SF Group, it was recommended to use standard shoes more suitable for diabetic foot, with some specific characteristics, such as sports or walking shoes. The acquisition or not of a more suitable shoes by the participants was at the discretion of each individual.
The plantar orthoses (PO) that both groups used for distribute of plantar loads was based on the principle of total contact. The confection material consisted in a liner of EVA shore 20º and polyurethane filling ELAX flexible (expandable) from OKM Química Ortopédica SL.
An information leaflet with foot care was delivered, with the aim of ensuring that participants were informed about the care they should continually take with their feet during the study period. This leaflet was created based on the guidelines of the "Associação Protetora dos Diabéticos" in Portugal.
Marta Botelho
Faro, Algarve, Portugal
Change the Quality of Life
Significantly change any subscore or total score of Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey instrument, that was use it to assess quality of life. Instrument scores can range between 0 - 100. Higher values mean better self-perception of quality of life.
Time frame: 4 months
Change the Performance of Lower Extremity Functional Scale
Change at least 9 points in Lower Extremity Functional Scale (minimum change for clinically relevant functional improvement). Instrument scores can range between 0 - 80. Higher values mean better functionality.
Time frame: 4 months
Change the Functional Reach Test performance
Significantly change the maximum distance (cm) attained in Functional Reach Test.
Time frame: 4 months
Change the Unipedal Stance Test performance
Change the time (s) in left and right unipedal stance.
Time frame: 4 months
Change the Static Full Tandem Test performance
Change the time (s) in full-tandem position.
Time frame: 4 months
Change the Walking Full Tandem Test performance
Achieve at least 10 steps in full-tandem.
Time frame: 4 months
Change the Time Up and Go Test performance
Change the time (s) in performing the Time Up and Go test.
Time frame: 4 months
Change the 6 minutes walk test performance
Change the distance (m) covered for 6 minutes of walking.
Time frame: 4 months
Change the Postural Stability (length displacement of Center of Pressure)
Significantly change the length displacement (mm) of center of pressure.
Time frame: 4 months
Change the Postural Stability (displacement of Center of Pressure)
Significantly change the amplitude mediolateral and anteroposterior displacement (mm) of Center of Pressure.
Time frame: 4 months
Change the Postural Stability (Ellipse surface)
Significantly change the ellipse surface (mm2).
Time frame: 4 months
Change the Postural Stability (Mean Speed of Center of Pressure)
Significantly change the mean speed of CoP (mm/s).
Time frame: 4 months
Change the Postural Stability (Standard deviation of Center of Pressure)
Significantly change the mediolateral and anteroposterior standard deviation (mm).
Time frame: 4 months
Change the Postural Stability (Root Mean Square)
Significantly change the root mean square index (mm).
Time frame: 4 months
Change the Postural Stability (Romberg Ration Index)
Significantly change the romberg ration index (mm).
Time frame: 4 months
Change the mean pressure in static position
Change the mean pressure (kPa) on each foot in static position.
Time frame: 4 months
Change the maximum pressure in static position
Change the maximum pressure (kPa) in each forefoot and hindfoot in static position.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 4 months
Change the support surface in static position
Change the support surface (cm2) between the plantar surface and the platform sensors, during the support phase on each of the feet.
Time frame: 4 months
Change the load distribution in static position
Change the load distribution (%) between each foot.
Time frame: 4 months
Change the maximum pressure in gait
Change the maximum pressure (kPa) of each foot in gait.
Time frame: 4 months
Change the mean pressure in gait
Change the mean pressure (kPa) on each foot in gait.
Time frame: 4 months
Change the plantar impression length in gait
Change the plantar impression Length (mm) of each of the feet.
Time frame: 4 months
Change the support surface in gait
Change the support surface (cm2) of each foot.
Time frame: 4 months
Change the longitude of CoP in gait
Change the longitude of the center of pressure (mm) of each foot.
Time frame: 4 months
Change the load distribution in gait
Change the load distribution (%) between the forefoot and hindfoot and between the medial and lateral zone.
Time frame: 4 months
Change the foot progression angle of gait
Change the foot progression angle in gait.
Time frame: 4 months
Change the double support time of gait
Change the double support time (ms) in gait.
Time frame: 4 months
Change the support time of gait
Change the support time (ms) for each foot in gait.
Time frame: 4 months
Change the step length of gait
Change the step length (m) in gait.
Time frame: 4 months
Adherence to the intervention
Number of hours per day using the devices (telephone monitoring).
Time frame: 2 months
Self-Perception of improvements
Presence or not of improvements in feet/legs with the devices (telephone monitoring).
Time frame: 2 months
Satisfaction with devices
Level of Satisfaction (totally satisfied, quite satisfied, satisfied, little satisfied, dissatisfied) with the devices (telephone monitoring).
Time frame: 2 months