SmartCardia Wireless Recorder as a Telemetry System

Overview

Patients hospitalized at the clinic Cecil who need telemetry will be monitored for 48 hours with the SmartCardia system in addition to conventional monitoring.

Cardiac arrhythmias, such as atrial fibrillation or ventricular arrhythmias, are often asymptomatic and sometimes associated with an adverse event, such as a stroke or syncope. Telemetry monitoring in hospitals, 24 hours a day, is the most used method for detecting these cardiac arrhythmias, especially after major surgery or cardiac surgery. Currently this cardiac monitoring is ensured by a system called telemetry, a kind of box connected to 4 electrodes stuck on the patient's chest. Information is continuously transmitted to a screen located in the nurses' room, which is supposed to watch the screen continuously. There are also alarms that can be triggered when an arrhythmia occurs. In practice, it is found that very often the electrodes are disconnected for practical reasons (patient going to the toilet for example) or accidentally. The alarms are not always observed because they very often sound badly. In addition, 24-hour telemetric monitoring sometimes fails to detect the culprit arrhythmia. Event monitoring significantly increases performance of the system. It has recently been shown that the ZIO patch (iRhythm Technologies Ltd.), a wireless electrocardiography allows te detection of arrhythmias in children, confirming the usefulness of such devices in daily practice. 3.2 Investigational product and indication. The SmartCardia patch (SmartCardia, EPFL (Ecole polytechnique fédérale Lausanne) Innovation Park, Lausanne, Switzerland) is a lightweight wireless ECG device (Figure 1) mounted on a patch with waterproof properties. The device is completely wireless and has no external connection wires. It allows patients to go about their daily activities with minimal disruption. The SmartCardia system allows in hospital patients monitoring, and corresponds to telemetry, functioning as 24 hour cardiac monitoring. The device is placed on the upper left part of the patient's chest (Figure 2). The patch can wirelessly communicate the data to a screen that will display it live. In addition, this data will be stored in the recording device and in the cloud. Once monitoring is complete, the data remains stored in the cloud and is available to physicians. During the recording, at any time, the doctor can be connected and interrogate the device in order to visualise the arrhythmias of his patient. The first studies using this device in the clinic have recently been published with very encouraging results. The device is classified in category A (Swiss government office decision attached). Previous trials with this device have shown its clinical usefulness in the intensive care unit and in daily practice. The device is actually proposed and used by many cardiologists as an alternative to the conventional Holter monitoring system. The goal of the present trial is mainly to confirm tha ability of this device to be used as a telemetry system on the ward in order to overpass the inconvenience of the actual system related to permanent cable connections with the risk of disconnexion and lost of monitoring. This trial is mainly a confirmation of that the device is a valuable option for telemetry. The device used for this trial is the one certified by Swissmedics with UE (Union Européenne) certification 3.3 Pre-clinical evidence The benefits of using such a type of monitoring are obvious. The patient is autonomous in his movements. The risks associated with disconnection are nonexistent. In addition, the doctor can consult the patient's data directly at any time. Finally, the data are stored in the cloud and archiving is made easier. The only risk associated with this system is an allergy to the adhesive patch. In view of the potential benefits expected from the use of this system, it is easy to understand that the study is justified. It should be kept in mind that the conventional system also has limits essentially linked to the risk of cable disconnection. The risk linked to a bad registration of the SmartCardia system which would generate an incorrect treatment does not exist, because the clinical decision will be taken by the doctor and based only on the data provided by conventional monitoring. Previous trials have shown the accuracy and advantages of this new wireless recorder. The system is already used in the daily practice in several countries as an alternative to conventional Holter monitoring. 3.4 Explanation for choice of comparator The new system will be used in parallel with the conventional monitoring system. It is obvious that the conventional monitoring system should be used as the gold standard. 3.5 Risks/Benefit There are no risks related to the use of this new device as therapeutic decision will be based only the recording of the conventional system. Benefits could be expected in the future since wireless system are preferred by the patients as demonstrated in previous trials comparing Holter monitoring and the SmartCardia device. 3.6 Justification of choice of study population Patients after cardiac surgery are usually monitored for a few days when they are back to the ward. It is obvious that they are the cohort of choice for such monitoring since they require it anyway.

Conditions

Interventions

Eligibility

Locations (1)

Outcomes