Patients with chronic low back pain from Dr. Robert Edwards' study at the Brigham \& Women's Pain Institute that examines sensory and pain perceptions in patients with chronic pain who use opioids will complete quantitative sensory testing (QST) and current pain levels will be obtained. Subsequently, 20-minutes of Immersive Virtual Reality (IVR) will be completed and then QST testing will be completed again post-IVR.
We will partner with Dr. Robert Edwards at the Brigham \& Women's Pain Institute. Dr. Edward's is an expert in testing central sensitization using quantitative sensory testing (QST).12 QST involves cutaneous (skin) psychophysical (semi-subjective) testing to assess sensory and pain perception pathways.13 QST identifies the intensity of stimuli (touch) is needed to feel something (threshold of detection) and how perception of stimuli changes if it is repeated many times (temporal summation).14 In people with central sensitization, even light intensity of stimulation is perceived as pain and similar intensity stimuli becomes more painful with multiple applications. We hypothesize that people with chronic pain will demonstrate clinically important reductions in the threshold of detection and temporal summation after IVR, which will demonstrate that IVR can affect central sensitization. We will complete two types of QST testing: Mechanical Pressure Pain Thresholds (MPPTh) to test for threshold of detection, and Mechanical Temporal Summation of Pain (MTSP) to test for temporal summation. In MPPTh we will measure the amount of pressure needed at the shoulder and thumb (body sites that routinely do not have pain in people with low back pain) to elicit a pain report from participants. In MTSP we will apply a train of 10 stimuli (light pinprick) at the rate of 1 per second on the middle finger and have participants rate the painfulness of the first, fifth, and tenth stimulus. During the study, we will recruit 20 patients with chronic low back pain from Dr. Edwards' study examining sensory and pain perceptions in patients with chronic pain who use opioids. We will complete QST testing and obtain current pain levels. We will complete 20-minutes of IVR, and then complete QST testing again. We will compare pre-IVR MPPTh and MTSP with post IVR levels. We anticipate short term, clinically important decreases in QST levels providing initial confirmation that IVR can positively change central sensitization.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Participants are placed in three-dimensional, life-sized computer-generated environments via a computer headset shows potential as a treatment for chronic pain and central sensitization.
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, United States
Quantitative sensory testing (QST): Mechanical Pressure Pain Thresholds (MPPTh)
Test for threshold of detection: Measure the amount of pressure needed at the shoulder and thumb (body sites that routinely do not have pain in people with low back pain) to elicit a pain report from participants
Time frame: Completed immediately prior to IVR intervention: Approximately 5 minutes
Quantitative sensory testing (QST): Mechanical Pressure Pain Thresholds (MPPTh)
Test for threshold of detection: Measure the amount of pressure needed at the shoulder and thumb (body sites that routinely do not have pain in people with low back pain) to elicit a pain report from participants
Time frame: Completed immediately after IVR intervention: Approximately 5 minutes
Quantitative sensory testing (QST): Mechanical Temporal Summation of Pain (MTSP)
Test for temporal summation: Apply a train of 10 stimuli (light pinprick) at the rate of 1 per second on the middle finger and have participants rate the painfulness of the first, fifth, and tenth stimulus.
Time frame: Completed immediately prior to IVR intervention: Approximately 5 minutes
Quantitative sensory testing (QST): Mechanical Temporal Summation of Pain (MTSP)
Test for temporal summation: Apply a train of 10 stimuli (light pinprick) at the rate of 1 per second on the middle finger and have participants rate the painfulness of the first, fifth, and tenth stimulus.
Time frame: Completed immediately after IVR intervention: Approximately 5 minutes
PANAS
Two scales one for Positive and one for Negative Affect - Score for each scale 10 to 50 with a lower score indicating less of that affect
Time frame: Completed immediately prior to IVR intervention
PANAS
Two scales one for Positive and one for Negative Affect - Score for each scale 10 to 50 with a lower score indicating less of that affect
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Completed immediately after IVR intervention
Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2)
Scale examining quality of pain with 22 possible pain related symptoms - Score for each scale 0 - 10; 0 as "none", 10 as "worst possible"
Time frame: Completed immediately prior to IVR intervention
Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2)
Scale examining quality of pain with 22 possible pain related symptoms - Score for each scale 0 - 10; 0 as "none", 10 as "worst possible"
Time frame: Completed immediately after IVR intervention
Simulator Sickness Questionnaire
Scale examining symptoms related to user experience in IVR. 16 symptoms. Scale of none, slight, moderate, severe
Time frame: Completed immediately after IVR experience
IGroup Presence Questionnaire
User immersion measured with 14 questions related to immersion in IVR experience. Scale of 1-7.
Time frame: Completed immediately after IVR experience