The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of tiragolumab in combination with atezolizumab plus pemetrexed and carboplatin/cisplatin (Arm A) compared with placebo in combination with pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed and carboplatin/cisplatin (Arm B) in participants with previously untreated, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive one of the following treatment regimens during the induction phase: * Arm A: Tiragolumab plus atezolizumab plus pemetrexed and carboplatin or cisplatin * Arm B: Placebo plus pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed and carboplatin or cisplatin Following the induction phase, participants will continue maintenance therapy with either tiragolumab in combination with atezolizumab and pemetrexed (Arm A) or placebo in combination with pembrolizumab and pemetrexed (Arm B).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
542
Tiragolumab at a fixed dose of 600 milligrams (mg), administered by intravenous (IV) infusion, every 3 weeks (Q3W) on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.
Atezolizumab at a fixed dose of 1200 mg, administered by IV infusion, Q3W on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.
Pemetrexed 500 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2), administered by IV infusion, Q3W on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.
Carboplatin at dose of area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 5, administered by IV infusion, Q3W on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles.
Cisplatin 75 mg/m\^2, administered by IV infusion, Q3W on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles.
Matching placebo, administered by IV infusion, Q3W on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.
Pembrolizumab at a fixed dose of 200 mg, administered by IV infusion, Q3W, on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.
UCLA
Los Angeles, California, United States
PIH Health Whittier Hospital
Whittier, California, United States
SCRI Florida Cancer Specialists South
Fort Myers, Florida, United States
SCRI Florida Cancer Specialists North
St. Petersburg, Florida, United States
Advent Health Orlando
Winter Park, Florida, United States
Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Determined by the Investigator
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD, as determined by the investigator according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) criteria, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters (SOD) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline), in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the SOD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Kaplan-Meier (KM) methodology was used to estimate the median PFS.
Time frame: From randomization to first occurrence of PD or death from any cause (up to approximately 40 months)
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. KM methodology was used to estimate the median OS.
Time frame: From randomization to death from any cause (up to approximately 40 months)
PFS as Determined by the Independent Review Facility (IRF)
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1 criteria, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline), in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the SOD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. KM methodology was used to estimate the median PFS.
Time frame: From randomization to first occurrence of PD or death from any cause (up to approximately 40 months)
Investigator Assessed PFS in Participants With PD-L1 Expression at TPS/TC >=1%
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1 criteria, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline), in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the SOD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. KM methodology was used to estimate the median PFS.
Time frame: From randomization to first occurrence of PD or death from any cause (up to approximately 40 months)
Investigator Assessed PFS in Participants With PD-L1 Expression at TPS/TC >=50%
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD, as determined by the investigator according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) criteria, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline), in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the SOD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. KM methodology was used to estimate the median PFS.
Time frame: From randomization to first occurrence of PD or death from any cause (up to approximately 40 months)
OS in Participants With PD-L1 Expression at TPS/TC >=1%
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. KM methodology was used to estimate the median OS.
Time frame: From randomization to death from any cause (up to approximately 40 months)
OS in Participants With PD-L1 Expression at TPS/TC >= 50%
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. KM methodology was used to estimate the median OS.
Time frame: From randomization to death from any cause (up to approximately 40 months)
PFS Rate at Month 6 and Month 12
PFS at 6 months and 12 months was defined as the percentage of participants who have not experienced PD as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause at 6 months and at 12 months, respectively. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline), in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the SOD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
Time frame: At Month 6 and Month 12
OS Rate at Month 12 and Month 24
OS rate at 12 months and 24 months was defined as the percentage of participants who have not experienced death from any cause at 12 and 24 months, respectively.
Time frame: At Month 12 and Month 24
Duration of Response (DOR)
DOR was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented objective response (OR) to PD, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Complete response (CR) was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target lesions) must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. Partial response (PR) was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline) or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the SOD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. KM methodology was used to estimate the median DOR.
Time frame: Up to approximately 40 months
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
ORR was defined as a percentage of participants with a CR or PR on two consecutive occasions ≥ 4 weeks apart, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target lesions) must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. Percentages have been rounded off.
Time frame: Up to approximately 40 months
Time to Confirmed Deterioration (TTCD) in Participant-Reported Physical Functioning (PF) as Measured by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life-Core 30 Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)
EORTC QLQ-C30=self-reported measure, with 30 questions assessing 5 aspects of subjects functioning (physical, emotional, role, cognitive \& social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea \& vomiting, \& pain), global health status (GHS) \& Quality of Life (QoL), \& 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea \& financial difficulties) within the previous week. Functioning \& symptoms items were scored on a 4-point scale: 1=not at all to 4=very much. Scores were linearly transformed to a range of 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting better functioning. TTCD was defined time from the date of randomization until the first confirmed clinically meaningful deterioration. Confirmed clinically meaningful deterioration was defined as score decrease of ≥10 from baseline in PF scale score that were held for at least two consecutive assessments or an initial ≥10 decrease from baseline followed by death from any cause within 3 weeks.
Time frame: Up to approximately 40 months
TTCD in Participant-Reported Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QoL) as Measured by EORTC QLQ-C30
EORTC QLQ-C30=self-reported measure, with 30 questions assessing 5 aspects of subjects functioning (physical, emotional, role, cognitive \& social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea \& vomiting, \& pain), global health status (GHS) \& Quality of Life (QoL), \& 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea \& financial difficulties) within the previous week . GHS and QoL items were scored on a 7-point scale (1=very poor 7=excellent). Scores were linearly transformed to a range of 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting better GHS/QoL. TTCD was defined as time from the date of randomization until the first confirmed clinically meaningful deterioration. Confirmed clinically meaningful deterioration was defined as score decrease of ≥10 from baseline in GHS/QoL scale score that were held for at least two consecutive assessments or an initial ≥10 decrease from baseline followed by death from any cause within 3 weeks.
Time frame: Up to approximately 40 months
TTCD in Participant-Reported Dyspnoea as Measured by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Lung Cancer 13 (EORTC QLQ-LC13)
The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is comprised of 13 lung cancer-specific items and includes 11 disease-specific scales/items (dyspnea, coughing, hemoptysis, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, pain in chest, pain in arm or shoulder, pain in other parts, pain medication). Symptoms were scored on a 4-point scale: 1=not at all to 4=very much. Scores are linearly transformed to a range of 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a worse level of dyspnoea. TTCD was defined as time from the date of randomization until the first confirmed clinically meaningful deterioration. Confirmed clinically meaningful deterioration in symptoms was defined as a score increase of ≥ 10-point from baseline in a symptom score that must be held for at least two consecutive assessments or an initial increase ≥ 10-point from baseline followed by death from any cause within 3 weeks.
Time frame: Up to approximately 40 months
TTCD in Participant-Reported Chest Pain, as Measured by EORTC QLQ-LC13
The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is comprised of 13 lung cancer-specific items and includes 11 disease-specific scales/items (dyspnea, coughing, hemoptysis, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, pain in chest, pain in arm or shoulder, pain in other parts, pain medication). Chest pain were scored on a 4-point scale: 1=not at all to 4=very much. Scores are linearly transformed to a range of 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a worse level of chest pain. TTCD was defined as time from the date of randomization until the first confirmed clinically meaningful deterioration. Confirmed clinically meaningful deterioration in symptoms was defined as a score increase of ≥ 10-point from baseline in a symptom score that must be held for at least two consecutive assessments or an initial increase ≥ 10-point from baseline followed by death from any cause within 3 weeks.
Time frame: Up to approximately 40 months
TTCD in Participant-Reported Cough, as Measured by EORTC QLQ-LC13
The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is comprised of 13 lung cancer-specific items and includes 11 disease-specific scales/items (dyspnea, coughing, hemoptysis, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, pain in chest, pain in arm or shoulder, pain in other parts, pain medication). Cough were scored on a 4-point scale: 1=not at all to 4=very much. Scores are linearly transformed to a range of 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a worse level of cough. TTCD was defined as time from the date of randomization until the first confirmed clinically meaningful deterioration. Confirmed clinically meaningful deterioration in symptoms was defined as a score increase of ≥ 10-point from baseline in a symptom score that must be held for at least two consecutive assessments or an initial increase ≥ 10-point from baseline followed by death from any cause within 3 weeks.
Time frame: Up to approximately 40 months
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including abnormal laboratory values or abnormal clinical test results), symptoms, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product.
Time frame: From study start up to 90 days after last dose (up to approximately 40.8 months)
Number of Participants With Response to Side Effects of Treatment as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Item List 46 (EORTC IL46)
The EORTC IL46 is a validated single-item question that assesses overall side effect impact, i.e. "To what extent have you been troubled with side-effects from your treatment ". Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (1= Not at all, 2= A Little, 3= Quite a Bit, and 4= Very Much).
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57 and treatment discontinuation visit (each cycle=21 days) (Up to 40 months)
Serum Concentration of Atezolizumab
Time frame: Predose Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16 and at treatment completion (TC)/early discontinuation (ED); and 0.5 hour (h) postdose Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle=21 days) (Up to 40 months)
Serum Concentration of Tiragolumab
Time frame: Predose Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16 and at TC/ED; and 0.5 hour (h) postdose Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle=21 days) (Up to 40 months)
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Atezolizumab
Participants who received atezolizumab were considered to be treatment-emergent ADA-positive if they were ADA-negative or had missing data at baseline but developed an ADA response following atezolizumab exposure (treatment-induced ADA response), or if they were ADA-positive at baseline and the titer of one or more post-baseline samples was at least 0.60 titer units (t.u.) greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment-enhanced ADA response). Participants with a positive post-baseline sample has been reported here.
Time frame: Up to approximately 40 months
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent ADAs to Tiragolumab
Participants who received tiragolumab were considered to be treatment-emergent ADA-positive if they were ADA-negative or had missing data at baseline but developed an ADA response following tiragolumab exposure (treatment-induced ADA response), or if they were ADA-positive at baseline and the titer of one or more post-baseline samples was at least 0.60 t.u. greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment-enhanced ADA response). Participants with a positive post-baseline sample has been reported here.
Time frame: Up to approximately 40 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Northwest Georgia Oncology Centers PC - Marietta
Marietta, Georgia, United States
Fort Wayne Medical Oncology and Hematology, Inc
Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States
Baptist Health Lexington
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Tennessee Oncology Chattanooga
Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States
Sarah Cannon Research Institute / Tennessee Oncology
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
...and 117 more locations