The respiratory distress that goes with COVID-19 infection has been related to a procoagulant state, with thrombosis at both venous and arterial levels, that determines hypoxia and tissue dysfunction at several organs. The main sign of this thrombotic activity seems to be the D-Dimers, that have been proposed to identify patients with poor prognosis at an early stage. Knowledge on how to prevent or even treat this procoagulant state is scarce. COVID-19 patients may be out of general thromboprophylaxis recommendations, and recent studies suggest a better prognosis in severe COVID-19 patients receiving anticoagulant therapy with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). However, the LMWH efficacy and safety, mainly in patients admitted to an Intensive Care Unit, remains to be validated.
Many reports have postulated a procoagulant state along with the respiratory distress caused by coronavirus SARS-CoV2. A complex physiopathology has been proposed trying to explain this profile, mainly based on the thromboinflammatory concept, with thrombosis at both venous and arterial levels. Microvascular thrombi impair the blood flow all over the body, with a vascular shunt due to capillary obstruction, that determines hypoxia and tissue dysfunction at several organs, being the lung the more affected one. Although D-Dimers (DD) are not specific indicators of clot formation, its elevation, in combination with other parameters (hyperfibrinogenemia, mild thrombocytopenia) may suggest a systemic coagulation activation with an increase of thrombin generation and fibrinolysis. In fact, in a retrospective Chinese analysis, a DD higher than 1000 ng/ml was proposed to identify patients with poor prognosis at an early stage. Nevertheless, knowledge on how to prevent or even treat this procoagulant state is scarce. Thromboprophylaxis with low molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is recommended in most medical patients admitted to the hospital and in nearly all patients in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU). But COVID-19 patients may be out of these recommendations, and some treatment schemes has been proposed, although how to decide the suitable LMWH for each clinical situation is controversial. Recent retrospective studies suggest a better prognosis in severe COVID-19 patients receiving anticoagulant therapy with LMWH. However, the LMWH efficacy and safety, mainly in COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU, remains to be validated.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
822
Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa
Zaragoza, Aragon, Spain
Hospital Universitario de Araba
Álava, Basque Country, Spain
Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León
León, Castille and León, Spain
Hospital Universitario Rio Ortega
Valladolid, Castille and León, Spain
Hospital General de Ciudad Real
Ciudad Real, Castille-La Mancha, Spain
ICU mortality
Rate of mortality
Time frame: From admission to ICU discharge, an average of 1 month
ICU incidence of thrombotic events
A composite endpoint to evaluate efficacy made up of: myocardial infarction, stroke, incidental pulmonary thromboembolism, pulmonary thromboembolism with worsening of hypoxemia, Pulmonary thromboembolism with hemodynamic repercussion, other venous thromboses without pulmonary thromboembolism
Time frame: From admission to ICU discharge, an average of 1 month
ICU incidence of bleeding events
Composite endpoint to evaluate safety made up of: bleeding needing transfusion, bleeding wit hemodynamic repercussion, other bleeding (minor bleeding)
Time frame: From admission to ICU discharge, an average of 1 month
Length of ICU stay
Days admitted in ICU
Time frame: From admission to ICU discharge, an average of 1 month
Length of invasive mechanical ventilation
Days treated with invasive mechanical ventilation (controlled or assisted)
Time frame: From admission to ICU discharge, an average of 1 month
Effect of LMWH in other parameters
Description of the relationship if any between the use of LMWH and thrombotic or inflammatory parameters (D-Dimer levels, ferritin) or lung dead space
Time frame: From admission to ICU discharge, an average of 1 month
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Hospital Clinic Barcelona
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Hospital de Terrasa
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Complejo Hospitalario de Cáceres
Cáceres, Extramedura, Spain
Hospital Unversitario A Coruña
A Coruña, Galicia, Spain
...and 21 more locations