The skin punch-biopsies are frequently used technical acts in the current medical practice. However, while these skills are actually easy to perform, the subsequent healing procedure remains still poorly harmonized. Indeed, it usually depends on the physicians personal experiences and some preconceived considerations without any reliable scientific background. This study aims to explore the performances of a directed wound healing behaviour in comparison with the suture.
Because of the lack of reliable scientific data about this topic, the usual behaviours concerning the subsequent healing procedure after a punch skin biopsy remains still poorly defined and harmonized, currently based on the physicians personal experiences and some preconceived considerations. The few studies available in the literature are supporting the assumption that the use of a directed wound healing could be as effective as the widely-used procedure of performing a suture while it does not downgrade the quality of care. However, due to their methodological quality and applicability, they have not led to a substantial modification of the common behaviours. Moreover, the development of some new and the improvement of the former resources could have changed the situation. Therefore, this study aims to bring some recent pragmatic data to assist the implementation of recommendations regarding the attitude to adopt for the healing procedure after a skin punch-biopsy. The protocol will consist in a monocentric, prospective, randomized and controlled, interventional study. It will be carried out with two parallel groups, in a non-inferiority setting. All the included participants will undergo a skin biopsy using a punch of 4 mm diameter. Then they will either get a suture by separated knots using a non-absorbable 4.0 wire and a dry dressing, either get only a dry dressing. All the subjects will receive a phone call at five days after the skin biopsy in order to collect the self-evaluation of the maximal experienced pain during the healing period. They will also have a single follow-up appointment one month after the inclusion and a photograph of the scar will be taken during this medical consultation. This picture will be evaluated by a blind independent investigator without the presence of the patient.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
suture by separated knots using a non-absorbable 4.0 wire and application of a dry dressing after the punch skin-biopsy
application of a dry dressing without any prior suture after the skin biopsy.
Centre Hospitalier Du Mans
Le Mans, France
Assess aesthetic quality of the scar by physician
the asserted aesthetic quality of the scar will be assessed by a dermatologist with 4-level scale
Time frame: one month after skin punch biopsy
Assess aesthetic quality of the scar by patient
The asserted aesthetic quality of the scar will be assessed by the participant himself using a 4-level scale
Time frame: 1 month after skin biopsy punch
Assess maximal pain experienced by the patient
The maximal pain experienced by the patient during the Healing phase will be assessed with a numerical scale ranging from 0 to 10
Time frame: 1 month after skin biopsy punch
Assess amount of bleeding
the scoring of the amount of bleeding subsequent to the skin biopsy will be assessed with a numerical scale ranging from 0 to 10
Time frame: immediately after skin biopsy punch
Assess clotting time
The clotting time subsequent to the skin biopsy will be assessed using a 4-level scale
Time frame: immediately after skin biopsy punch
Observe cutaneous infection
occurrence of a cutaneous infection that had required an antibiotic treatment and/or the achievement of a drainage during the month following the skin punch-biopsy
Time frame: 1 month after skin biopsy punch
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
290