Multicenter post-approval observational retrospective cohort study in routine clinical practice (Real World Evidence Study) to assess the 1-year safety profile associated with ticagrelor and clopidogrel therapy in a contemporary reprospective cohort of patients who survived the initial 30-day period after the index hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
To date, there are still a paucity of data on the medium- and long-term safety and efficacy outcomes of new antiplatelet agents, namely Ticagrelor and Prasugrel, compared to Clopidogrel in a real-world ACS setting. The ARIAM-Andalusia multicentre Registry, and the CREA-ARIAM multicentre Registry (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02500290; Fundación Pública Andaluza Progreso y SaludIdentifier: FPS-AAS-2014-01), are two Real World Evidence (RWE) studies aimed to investigate real-world practice on antiplatelet treatment in patients with ACS in Andalusia (Western Spain). Our group are interested in performing a retrospective observational pilot analysis using data from patients with ACS admitted to cardiovascular intensive care units in Andalusia (Spain), who were prospectively included in the ARIAM-Andalusia multicentre Registry, and the CREA-ARIAM multicentre Registry (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02500290; Fundación Pública Andaluza Progreso y Salud-Identifier: FPS-AAS-2014-01) between 2014 and March 2019. The main findings from the RWE study revealed a consistent net clinical benefit of Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel resulted in a significant reduction of short-term all-cause mortality favored Ticagrelor. In this scenario, after baseline imbalance adjustment using propensity score matching (PSM) and IPTW (inverse probability of treatment weight) methods, the net clinical benefit with Ticagrelor persisted. Preliminary results of the above mentioned study have been presented as an oral communication at the Annual Scientific Meeting of the Spanish Society of Cardiology (Madrid, October 2017). The aim of this new pilot study suggested is to describe the efficacy and safety of Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel after the first 30 days from hospital discharge and up to 1 year follow-up.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
1,900
Describe the safety of Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel use, in patients with ACS in terms of major bleeding between 30 days and one year after the index ACS event. An ITT approach and IPCW method to adjust for change of initial treatment will be used for the analysis.
Describe the safety of Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel use, in patients with ACS in terms of major bleeding between 30 days and one year after the index ACS event. An ITT approach and IPCW method to adjust for change of initial treatment will be used for the analysis.
Fundación Pública Progreso y Salud
Seville, Spain
Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
Seville, Spain
Major bleeding
Defined as BARC type≥ 3 according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) definition at 1-year follow-up after the index ACS.
Time frame: During 2 months
Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI)
Bleeding criteria
Time frame: During 2 months
BARC definition
Bleeding criteria
Time frame: During 2 months
Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE)
Defined as the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), stent thrombosis and stroke or TIA at 1-year follow-up after the index ACS admission.
Time frame: During 2 months
All-cause mortality
Component of MACCE
Time frame: During 2 months
Myocardial infarction
Component of MACCE
Time frame: During 2 months
Target lesion revascularization
Component of MACCE
Time frame: During 2 months
Stent thrombosis
Component of MACCE
Time frame: During 2 months
Stroke
Component of MACCE
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: During 2 months
Net clinical benefit/Net Adverse Clinical Event (NACE):
Defined as the composite of the efficacy (Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events-MACCE) and safety (BARC type≥ 2 bleeding episodes according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) definition for bleeding) outcomes at 1 year after the index ACS.
Time frame: During 2 months